Pregnancy and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

NCT ID: NCT03659708

Last Updated: 2024-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-22

Study Completion Date

2026-10-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in pregnancy still remains a challenge. An individual assessment of the VTE risk is crucial for optimal thromboprophylaxis, but there is no validated tool to help clinicians stratify the risk in pregnant women and introduce prophylactic anticoagulation at the appropriate time. Recommendations mostly based on case-control studies and expert opinions do not accurately reflect the physician's need. In view of the lack of international recommendations with a high level of evidence regarding prophylactic treatment of pregnant women at risk of thrombosis, the use of a risk stratification tool that takes all individual risk factors for VTE into consideration and which aids decisions over prophylaxis regimens may help. Investigators have previously described a VTE risk score (the Lyon-VTE-score), rating patients at increased risk of VTE and recommending individually tailored management. A retrospective evaluation of the initial score showed favorable outcomes in pregnancies with a high risk of thrombosis. A subsequent multicenter prospective study reported promising results using this score and related management strategy. The efficacy and safety after 10 years of prospective use of the Lyon-VTE-score in daily practice to guide the prescription of antithrombotic prophylaxis during pregnancy was recently evaluated and the results showed that the Lyon-VTE-score allows a standardized approach with objective criteria and can help non-specialized centers and young doctors manage these high-risk pregnancies.

The results of previous studies provide consistent conclusions on the safety and efficacy of the approach of investigators and give background for a medico-economic study to evaluate costs and consequences of this procedure. The most recent study (2005) evaluating the cost of prophylaxis in pregnant women, evaluated this cost as $1292 for each 6-week cycle of treatment. In addition, the use of such a score offers the prospect of personalized medicine, which is probably more cost-efficient compared to "inclusive, equal treatment for all".

In antepartum, the decision to administer thromboprophylaxis should be considered on an individual basis with regard to lowering the absolute risk of thrombosis, the inconvenience of daily subcutaneous heparin therapy and the potential risks of bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis. An individual assessment of the VTE risk is crucial for optimal thromboprophylaxis, but there is no validated tool to help clinicians to stratify VTE risk in pregnant women and to introduce prophylactic anticoagulation at the right time.

Most of the recommendations are grade 2C. They are mostly based on case-control studies and expert opinions and do not entirely highlight the physicians' need. The originality of this approach is the use of a risk stratification tool that takes all individual risk factors for VTE into consideration and that aids the decision-making process of antenatal anti-thrombotic prophylaxis. This study will personalize care using a score to individually assess the risk and propose appropriate prevention.

The main objective of this study is to conduct a medico-economic study to evaluate the efficiency of an innovative strategy integrating the Lyon-VTE-score in the management of pregnant patients with venous thromboembolism risk versus standard care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thromboembolism Pregnancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lyon-VTE score

300 adult pregnant women with a personal history of VTE and/or known thrombophilia, will be randomly included in this group and their VTE risk during pregnancy will be managed according to the Lyon-VTE score :

The Lyon score classifies patients into 3 risk categories and directs the preventive LMWH prescription:

* A score strictly less than 3 indicates a moderate thrombotic risk: the patient does not receive LMWH in ante-partum;
* A score between 3 and 5 indicates a high thrombotic risk: a preventive dose LMWH is introduced in the third trimester (from the beginning of the 7th month);
* A score greater than or equal to 6 indicates a very high thrombotic risk: LMWH at a preventive dose is prescribed throughout the ante-partum.

All patients receive an elasto-compression prescription and daily physical activity is recommended throughout pregnancy (except obstetric contraindication).

All patients also receive systematic preventive LMWH treatment postpartum for 6 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lyon-VTE score

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

follow-up at 3 months, 5 months, 7 months during pregnancy and 3 months and 12 months after delivery.

recommendations currently available

300 adult pregnant women with a personal history of VTE and/or known thrombophilia, will be randomly included in this group and their VTE risk during pregnancy will be managed according to the last ACCP guidelines or UK guidelines or Canadian recommendations or French recommendations, according to the habits of the center.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

recommendations currently available

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

follow-up at 7 months during pregnancy and 3 months and 12 months after delivery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lyon-VTE score

follow-up at 3 months, 5 months, 7 months during pregnancy and 3 months and 12 months after delivery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

recommendations currently available

follow-up at 7 months during pregnancy and 3 months and 12 months after delivery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult pregnant women at high risk of VTE (with a personal history of VTE and/or thrombophilia)
* giving informed consent to participate to the study

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindication to heparin therapy,
* women with obstetrical complications only, with no history of VTE (pre-eclampsia, HELLP\[ Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelet count\],intra-uterine growth retardation, miscarriage, etc),
* patients with a history of superficial venous thrombosis, and those with the highest VTE risk for whom clear recommendations with a high level of evidence are available (patients on long-term anticoagulants, or those with antiphospholipid syndrome or antithrombin deficiency).
* Patient participating in an ongoing study that could interfere with the study,
* Patient under legal protection measure.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yesim DARGAUD, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Cardiologique L. Pradel

Bron, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yesim DARGAUD, Pr

Role: CONTACT

4 72118810 ext. +33

Lucia RUGERI

Role: CONTACT

4 72118810 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yesim DARGAUD, Pr

Role: primary

4 72118810 ext. +33

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Middleton P, Shepherd E, Gomersall JC. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;3(3):CD001689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001689.pub4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33779986 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A02777-48

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

69HCL18_0032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LMWH Compliance in Pregnancy
NCT05066867 UNKNOWN