Efficacy of Liberal Versus Restricted IV Fluid Approach in the Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crisis

NCT ID: NCT07188766

Last Updated: 2025-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

394 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-31

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a prevalent inherited blood disorder characterized by vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), which lead to severe pain and complications. Despite hydration being a cornerstone of VOC management, the optimal fluid strategy remains uncertain. This study evaluates restrictive versus liberal fluid management strategies in patients with acute VOC.

This multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority RCT will enroll patients with SCD presenting with acute VOC. Participants will be randomized to either a restrictive or liberal intravenous fluid management protocol. Primary outcome is pain score reduction. Secondary outcomes include time to pain resolution, ED length of stay, hospital admission rate, cumulative opioid dose, adverse events (incidence of fluid overload, pulmonary congestion), acute chest syndrome, incidence of acute kidney injury, revisit rates within 72 hours of ED discharge, need for intensive care or high-dependency unit admission, need for additional interventions, and 28 days overall mortality. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles.

We hypothesize that a restrictive fluid strategy will achieve non-inferior pain control compared to a liberal strategy, while minimizing fluid-related complications. This study will provide evidence to inform clinical guidelines for fluid management in SCD patients experiencing VOCs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective, non-inferiority, open-label, multicenter randomized-controlled trial (RCT) conducted in the emergency departments (EDs) of tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The primary objective is to compare two fluid management strategies- restrictive (intervention) vs. liberal (control) in adult sickle cell disease (SCD) patients hospitalized for VOC. The study evaluates whether a restrictive fluid approach is non-inferior to a liberal strategy in terms of pain resolution, hospitalization duration, and other clinical outcomes.

Patients will be randomized upon ED admission, and their assigned fluid regimen will be administered within the first hour. Clinical teams will monitor outcomes throughout hospitalization or up to 28 days post-enrollment.

Study Population

1. Recruitment Screening: All patients admitted to the ED with VOC will be screened for eligibility.

Consent Model: A priori informed written consent will be obtained from conscious, coherent patients or substitute decision-makers.
2. Inclusion Criteria Age \>18 years with confirmed SCD diagnosis.

Presenting with VOC requiring hospitalization.

Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.
3. Exclusion Criteria Requiring specialized IVF management per physician discretion.

Cardiac/Renal Conditions:

Congestive heart failure (CHF) or symptomatic systolic heart failure.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney injury (AKI), or renal transplantation.

Hemodynamic Instability:

Shock (SBP \<100 mmHg or MAP \<65) with hypoperfusion signs.

Other Exclusions:

Known/suspected pregnancy.

Prior enrollment in this trial within the last 30 days.

Concurrent enrollment in another trial affecting fluid management.

Inability to obtain IV access.

Trial Intervention

1. Screening \& Randomization Screening occurs upon ED admission; evaluations must precede randomization.

A screening log will track eligible vs. randomized patients.
2. Informed Consent A-priori consent model used due to the conscious-coherent state of most SCD patients in VOC.

Efforts will be made to obtain consent immediately from the patient or surrogate.
3. Intervention Arms A. Intervention (Restrictive)Keep-vein-open (KVO) rate only (minimal fluids to maintain IV patency). No additional IV fluids administered.

B. Control (Liberal) 20 mL/kg IV bolus (NS or LR over 1 hour) + maintenance fluids (1.5-2 mL/kg/day).

Initiation: Both regimens start within 1 hour of ED admission and continue until ED discharge.

Hospitalized Patients:

Pain scores (NPRS) recorded at 24 \& 48 hours. Total fluid intake documented at hospital discharge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SCD Vaso Occlussive Crisis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective, non-inferiority, open label multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients on Intervention Group (Restricted approach group) will receive maintenance intravenous fluids at a keep-vein-open (KVO) rate and no extra intravenous fluids is administered.

Control Group (Liberal Approach Group) Patients will receive an IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline or lactated Ringer's over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Restricted approach group

Patients in this arm will receive maintenance intravenous fluids at a keep-vein-open (KVO) rate and no extra intravenous fluids is administered

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

Intervention Type DRUG

Keep vein open rate

Liberal Approach Group

Patients will receive an IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline or lactated Ringer's over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

Intervention Type DRUG

IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

Keep vein open rate

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Restricted Liberal

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients \>18 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of SCD.
2. Presenting with a VOC.
3. Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient requiring specialized IVF management as per the treating physician discretion.
2. Patients with congestive heart failure, and /or acute or chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure
3. Patients with a history of chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury or renal transplantation
4. Patients with signs of shock (low SBP \<100 or MAP \< 65) and signs of hypo perfusion
5. Known or suspected pregnancy
6. Previously enrolled in this trial within the last 30 days
7. Enrolled in another trial study that interfered with fluid management
8. Unable to obtain IV access.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammed Saeed Saad Alshahrani

Consultant, Emergency and Critical Care Departments

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

King Fahd Hospital of the University- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD

Role: CONTACT

+966556966663

Laila Perlas Asonto, RN

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Puri L, Nottage KA, Hankins JS, Anghelescu DL. State of the Art Management of Acute Vaso-occlusive Pain in Sickle Cell Disease. Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Feb;20(1):29-42. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0263-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28853040 (View on PubMed)

Rizio AA, Bhor M, Lin X, McCausland KL, White MK, Paulose J, Nandal S, Halloway RI, Bronte-Hall L. The relationship between frequency and severity of vaso-occlusive crises and health-related quality of life and work productivity in adults with sickle cell disease. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1533-1547. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02412-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31933113 (View on PubMed)

Okomo U, Meremikwu MM. Fluid replacement therapy for acute episodes of pain in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 12;(3):CD005406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005406.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25764071 (View on PubMed)

Brandow AM, Carroll CP, Creary S, Edwards-Elliott R, Glassberg J, Hurley RW, Kutlar A, Seisa M, Stinson J, Strouse JJ, Yusuf F, Zempsky W, Lang E. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain. Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2656-2701. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32559294 (View on PubMed)

Rosa RM, Bierer BE, Thomas R, Stoff JS, Kruskall M, Robinson S, Bunn HF, Epstein FH. A study of induced hyponatremia in the prevention and treatment of sickle-cell crisis. N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 13;303(20):1138-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198011133032002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6999348 (View on PubMed)

GBD 2021 Sickle Cell Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Aug;10(8):e585-e599. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00118-7. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37331373 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-01-0451

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fluids in Septic Shock (FISSH)
NCT03677102 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3