Efficacy of Liberal Versus Restricted IV Fluid Approach in the Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crisis
NCT ID: NCT07188766
Last Updated: 2025-09-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
394 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-31
2026-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority RCT will enroll patients with SCD presenting with acute VOC. Participants will be randomized to either a restrictive or liberal intravenous fluid management protocol. Primary outcome is pain score reduction. Secondary outcomes include time to pain resolution, ED length of stay, hospital admission rate, cumulative opioid dose, adverse events (incidence of fluid overload, pulmonary congestion), acute chest syndrome, incidence of acute kidney injury, revisit rates within 72 hours of ED discharge, need for intensive care or high-dependency unit admission, need for additional interventions, and 28 days overall mortality. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles.
We hypothesize that a restrictive fluid strategy will achieve non-inferior pain control compared to a liberal strategy, while minimizing fluid-related complications. This study will provide evidence to inform clinical guidelines for fluid management in SCD patients experiencing VOCs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
20% Albumin vs. Balanced Salt Solution as Resuscitation Fluid in Cirrhosis With Sepsis Induced Hypotension
NCT05441878
Effects of IV Chloride Content on Outcomes
NCT02083198
Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT02748382
Efficacy, Safety of Solution Containing Hyperosmolar Sodium Lactate Infusion for Resuscitation of Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock
NCT01433276
Normal Saline Vrs Balanced i.v. Fluids in Neurosurgery
NCT03429127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be randomized upon ED admission, and their assigned fluid regimen will be administered within the first hour. Clinical teams will monitor outcomes throughout hospitalization or up to 28 days post-enrollment.
Study Population
1. Recruitment Screening: All patients admitted to the ED with VOC will be screened for eligibility.
Consent Model: A priori informed written consent will be obtained from conscious, coherent patients or substitute decision-makers.
2. Inclusion Criteria Age \>18 years with confirmed SCD diagnosis.
Presenting with VOC requiring hospitalization.
Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.
3. Exclusion Criteria Requiring specialized IVF management per physician discretion.
Cardiac/Renal Conditions:
Congestive heart failure (CHF) or symptomatic systolic heart failure.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney injury (AKI), or renal transplantation.
Hemodynamic Instability:
Shock (SBP \<100 mmHg or MAP \<65) with hypoperfusion signs.
Other Exclusions:
Known/suspected pregnancy.
Prior enrollment in this trial within the last 30 days.
Concurrent enrollment in another trial affecting fluid management.
Inability to obtain IV access.
Trial Intervention
1. Screening \& Randomization Screening occurs upon ED admission; evaluations must precede randomization.
A screening log will track eligible vs. randomized patients.
2. Informed Consent A-priori consent model used due to the conscious-coherent state of most SCD patients in VOC.
Efforts will be made to obtain consent immediately from the patient or surrogate.
3. Intervention Arms A. Intervention (Restrictive)Keep-vein-open (KVO) rate only (minimal fluids to maintain IV patency). No additional IV fluids administered.
B. Control (Liberal) 20 mL/kg IV bolus (NS or LR over 1 hour) + maintenance fluids (1.5-2 mL/kg/day).
Initiation: Both regimens start within 1 hour of ED admission and continue until ED discharge.
Hospitalized Patients:
Pain scores (NPRS) recorded at 24 \& 48 hours. Total fluid intake documented at hospital discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Control Group (Liberal Approach Group) Patients will receive an IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline or lactated Ringer's over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Restricted approach group
Patients in this arm will receive maintenance intravenous fluids at a keep-vein-open (KVO) rate and no extra intravenous fluids is administered
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %
Keep vein open rate
Liberal Approach Group
Patients will receive an IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline or lactated Ringer's over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %
IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %
Keep vein open rate
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %
IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Presenting with a VOC.
3. Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with congestive heart failure, and /or acute or chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure
3. Patients with a history of chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury or renal transplantation
4. Patients with signs of shock (low SBP \<100 or MAP \< 65) and signs of hypo perfusion
5. Known or suspected pregnancy
6. Previously enrolled in this trial within the last 30 days
7. Enrolled in another trial study that interfered with fluid management
8. Unable to obtain IV access.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammed Saeed Saad Alshahrani
Consultant, Emergency and Critical Care Departments
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King Fahd Hospital of the University- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Puri L, Nottage KA, Hankins JS, Anghelescu DL. State of the Art Management of Acute Vaso-occlusive Pain in Sickle Cell Disease. Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Feb;20(1):29-42. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0263-z.
Rizio AA, Bhor M, Lin X, McCausland KL, White MK, Paulose J, Nandal S, Halloway RI, Bronte-Hall L. The relationship between frequency and severity of vaso-occlusive crises and health-related quality of life and work productivity in adults with sickle cell disease. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1533-1547. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02412-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
Okomo U, Meremikwu MM. Fluid replacement therapy for acute episodes of pain in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 12;(3):CD005406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005406.pub4.
Brandow AM, Carroll CP, Creary S, Edwards-Elliott R, Glassberg J, Hurley RW, Kutlar A, Seisa M, Stinson J, Strouse JJ, Yusuf F, Zempsky W, Lang E. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain. Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2656-2701. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851.
Rosa RM, Bierer BE, Thomas R, Stoff JS, Kruskall M, Robinson S, Bunn HF, Epstein FH. A study of induced hyponatremia in the prevention and treatment of sickle-cell crisis. N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 13;303(20):1138-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198011133032002.
GBD 2021 Sickle Cell Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Aug;10(8):e585-e599. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00118-7. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-01-0451
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.