AI and Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT07186803

Last Updated: 2026-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-17

Study Completion Date

2026-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Today, the majority of gallbladder removals surgeries are done using minimally invasive techniques through small cuts to help patients recover faster. However, these procedures are technically more challenging because surgeons have a restricted view of the patient's anatomy, which can increase the risk of serious complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been developed to guide surgeons during surgery and help them make safer decisions that reduce the risk of injury to the patient. This study will use a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes between surgeries with AI assistance and standard procedures without AI.

Primary Objective: To determine whether the AI improves surgeons' ability to achieve the Critical View of Safety, a key step for safe gallbladder removal, compared to standard procedures.

Secondary Objectives:

* Determine whether the AI helps the surgeon perform more safe dissections compared to the standard procedures.
* Collect surgeon feedback on the use of AI during the procedure

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To measure the clinical impact of artificial intelligence (AI) guidance on the achievement of safety milestones in laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to standard care, the study team will conduct a randomized controlled trial of 10 surgeons or fellows and 50 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at two hospital sites part of the University Health Network in Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Toronto General Hospital and Toronto Western Hospital). Surgeons or fellows randomized to the intervention group (AI) will each perform 5 procedures using two AI models that provide real-time feedback to guide safe dissections and the achievement of the critical view of safety. Surgeons or fellows randomized to the control group will each perform 5 procedures using the standard care approach. Internal laparoscopic recordings will be collected from both the intervention and control groups for post-operative outcome analysis by blinded expert surgeon reviewers.

The research team will evaluate whether the use of AI during the procedure improves the achievement rate of the Critical View of Safety as compared to standard procedures.

Additionally, secondary outcomes will be assessed including the proportion of dissections that occurred above the line of safety, surgeon feedback on the use of AI during the procedure, observational notes recorded by the research coordinator present during each procedure, and 30-day post operation chart review.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel Cluster Design with Stratified Randomization. Each cluster will consist of one surgeon attending or fellow. Clusters are stratified based on professional characteristics (Eg. experience level) before randomization to the intervention or control group.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Surgical Procedure

Surgeons/fellows will perform the procedure, as per standard care measures.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Artificial Intelligence Feedback

Surgeons or fellows in the intervention group will have access to two AI models during their procedure. A research coordinator will operate and monitor the AI models, which are displayed on a single monitor in the operating room. Participants may request to toggle between models or turn them off at any point during the procedure, as per their needs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Artificial Intelligence Guidance Models

Intervention Type DEVICE

The intervention will involve the use of two artificial intelligence (AI) models to provide surgical guidance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The AI models will provide real-time feedback based on the live surgical feed (internal patient anatomy captured by laparoscopic camera) displayed on an operating room monitor. The GoNoGoNet model identifies safe and unsafe zones of dissection. This is done by showcasing a green overlay over safe zones of dissection, and a red overlay over unsafe zones of dissection. The DeepCVS model provides text-based feedback based on its assessment of the following three criteria defining the Critical View of Safety: 1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, 2) only two structures visible entering the gallbladder (cystic artery and duct) and 3) the lower third of the gallbladder must be dissected off the liver bed, exposing the cystic plate.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Artificial Intelligence Guidance Models

The intervention will involve the use of two artificial intelligence (AI) models to provide surgical guidance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The AI models will provide real-time feedback based on the live surgical feed (internal patient anatomy captured by laparoscopic camera) displayed on an operating room monitor. The GoNoGoNet model identifies safe and unsafe zones of dissection. This is done by showcasing a green overlay over safe zones of dissection, and a red overlay over unsafe zones of dissection. The DeepCVS model provides text-based feedback based on its assessment of the following three criteria defining the Critical View of Safety: 1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, 2) only two structures visible entering the gallbladder (cystic artery and duct) and 3) the lower third of the gallbladder must be dissected off the liver bed, exposing the cystic plate.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Surgeon participants: Attending surgeons or fellows that perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy at University Health Network.
* Patients participants: Adults 18 years of age and over, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Surgeon participants: Anyone who is not a surgeon or fellow at University Health Network or that does not perform laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
* Patient participants: Any patient who is not having a laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amin Madani

Endocrine and Acute Care Surgeon and Researcher at The Institute for Education Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ariana Walji, BSc, MSc Candidate

Role: CONTACT

416-603-5185 ext. 2294

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ariana Walji, BSc, MSc Candidate

Role: primary

416-603-5185 ext. 2294

Ariana Walji, BSc, MSc Candidate

Role: primary

416-603-5185 ext. 2294

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25-5053

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.