AI and Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT07186803
Last Updated: 2026-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-17
2026-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary Objective: To determine whether the AI improves surgeons' ability to achieve the Critical View of Safety, a key step for safe gallbladder removal, compared to standard procedures.
Secondary Objectives:
* Determine whether the AI helps the surgeon perform more safe dissections compared to the standard procedures.
* Collect surgeon feedback on the use of AI during the procedure
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility and Utility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Machine Learning (ML) - Driven Advanced Intraoperative Visualization and Identification of Critical Anatomic Structures and Procedural Phases in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05775133
Robotic Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - Outcome and Cost Analyses of a Case-Matched Control Study
NCT00562900
Comparing the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Robotic Cholecystectomy
NCT03160157
Use of Robotics for Cholecystectomy; Retrospective Review of Outcomes, Set Up and Learning Curves
NCT03059745
Comparing Minilaparotomy and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Surgery Procedure
NCT01873638
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The research team will evaluate whether the use of AI during the procedure improves the achievement rate of the Critical View of Safety as compared to standard procedures.
Additionally, secondary outcomes will be assessed including the proportion of dissections that occurred above the line of safety, surgeon feedback on the use of AI during the procedure, observational notes recorded by the research coordinator present during each procedure, and 30-day post operation chart review.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Surgical Procedure
Surgeons/fellows will perform the procedure, as per standard care measures.
No interventions assigned to this group
Artificial Intelligence Feedback
Surgeons or fellows in the intervention group will have access to two AI models during their procedure. A research coordinator will operate and monitor the AI models, which are displayed on a single monitor in the operating room. Participants may request to toggle between models or turn them off at any point during the procedure, as per their needs.
Artificial Intelligence Guidance Models
The intervention will involve the use of two artificial intelligence (AI) models to provide surgical guidance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The AI models will provide real-time feedback based on the live surgical feed (internal patient anatomy captured by laparoscopic camera) displayed on an operating room monitor. The GoNoGoNet model identifies safe and unsafe zones of dissection. This is done by showcasing a green overlay over safe zones of dissection, and a red overlay over unsafe zones of dissection. The DeepCVS model provides text-based feedback based on its assessment of the following three criteria defining the Critical View of Safety: 1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, 2) only two structures visible entering the gallbladder (cystic artery and duct) and 3) the lower third of the gallbladder must be dissected off the liver bed, exposing the cystic plate.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Artificial Intelligence Guidance Models
The intervention will involve the use of two artificial intelligence (AI) models to provide surgical guidance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The AI models will provide real-time feedback based on the live surgical feed (internal patient anatomy captured by laparoscopic camera) displayed on an operating room monitor. The GoNoGoNet model identifies safe and unsafe zones of dissection. This is done by showcasing a green overlay over safe zones of dissection, and a red overlay over unsafe zones of dissection. The DeepCVS model provides text-based feedback based on its assessment of the following three criteria defining the Critical View of Safety: 1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, 2) only two structures visible entering the gallbladder (cystic artery and duct) and 3) the lower third of the gallbladder must be dissected off the liver bed, exposing the cystic plate.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients participants: Adults 18 years of age and over, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient participants: Any patient who is not having a laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amin Madani
Endocrine and Acute Care Surgeon and Researcher at The Institute for Education Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25-5053
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.