Compare the Quality of Life of Patients With Achalasia Cardia (AC) After Laparoscopic and Open Esophagocardiomyotomy.
NCT ID: NCT07177222
Last Updated: 2025-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
38 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-12-01
2025-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Ethical aspects. All research procedures were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and national ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Kyrgyz State Medical Academy (KSMA) named after I.K. Akhunbaev (protocol No. 6, dated 11.12.2017).
All participants were provided with a full explanation of the study objectives, methods, potential risks and benefits, and provided written informed consent prior to surgery and the processing of their anonymised clinical data for scientific purposes.
The study included 38 patients diagnosed with AC. The patients were divided into two groups: 18 patients underwent laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy, and 20 patients underwent open surgery.
A comparative analysis of these groups made it possible to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of both laparoscopic and traditional surgical interventions in the early and late postoperative periods.
All participants were provided with a full explanation of the study objectives, methods, potential risks and benefits, and provided written informed consent prior to surgery and the processing of their anonymised clinical data for scientific purposes.
The study included 38 patients diagnosed with AC. The patients were divided into two groups: 18 patients underwent laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy, and 20 patients underwent open surgery.
A comparative analysis of these groups made it possible to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of both laparoscopic and traditional surgical interventions in the early and late postoperative periods.
Inclusion criteria: Patients meeting the following requirements were accepted into the study:
* Clinically and instrumentally confirmed diagnosis of grade II-III AС, established on the basis of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, fluoroscopy with a contrast agent.
* No previous surgical operations on the esophagus and cardia;
* Availability of written informed consent for participation in the study and subsequent observation.
Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded from the study if they had:
* Severe concomitant diseases (cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine and others) that could limit the possibility of safe surgery and/or long-term observation;
* Detected malignant neoplasms of the esophagus, cardia or stomach;
* Refusal to participate in the study or inability to comply with the observation protocol. Preoperative preparation: All patients underwent a preoperative examination, which included: - Clinical history collection with a detailed description of complaints, duration and dynamics of the disease, presence of complications and concomitant diseases;
* General clinical and biochemical tests, electrocardiography;
* Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) to assess the degree of expansion of the esophagus, the condition of the mucous membrane and to exclude tumor processes;
* X-ray examination of the esophagus with barium contrast to assess the degree of esophageal dilation, the functional state of the cardia and the identification of associated changes (diverticula, gastroesophageal reflux).
Surgical intervention. Classical esophagocardiomyotomy performed via laparotomy remains the accepted method of treating AC. The operation involves esophagocardiomyotomy using the Heller technique, which improves the passage of food and reduces swallowing difficulties and reflux of gastric contents.
Traditional laparotomy access is associated with high trauma and a long recovery period. Laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy in our study was performed using modern minimally invasive technologies.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in POEM for Achalasia Cardia.
NCT03186248
Quality of Life After POEM for Achalasia
NCT05010889
Post-POEM GERD in Patients Undergoing Conventional Versus Oblique Fibers Sparing Posterior Myotomy for Achalasia Cardia
NCT04229342
Laparoscopy Heller Myotomy With Fundoplication Associated Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
NCT02138643
Peroral Endoscopic Remyotomy for Failed Heller Myotomy
NCT01637311
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
18 patients
underwent laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy
laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy
Heller myotomy, is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that involves cutting the muscle at the lower end of the esophagus to treat achalasia, a condition where this muscle (esophageal sphincter) fails to relax and hinders food passage into the stomach.
20 patients
underwent open surgery
open surgery
Open surgery, or traditional surgery, involves a surgeon making one large incision to directly access and view the internal organ or body part being operated on.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy
Heller myotomy, is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that involves cutting the muscle at the lower end of the esophagus to treat achalasia, a condition where this muscle (esophageal sphincter) fails to relax and hinders food passage into the stomach.
open surgery
Open surgery, or traditional surgery, involves a surgeon making one large incision to directly access and view the internal organ or body part being operated on.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No previous surgical operations on the esophagus and cardia;
* Availability of written informed consent for participation in the study and subsequent observation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Detected malignant neoplasms of the esophagus, cardia or stomach;
* Refusal to participate in the study or inability to comply with the observation protocol.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kyrgyz State Medical Academy
OTHER
Osh State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhypargul Abdullaeva
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bakytbek Osmonaliev, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kyrgyz State Medical Academy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy
Bishkek, , Kyrgyzstan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Quality of life in patients
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.