Hydroxyapatite vs Fluoride Toothpaste for MIH Remineralization
NCT ID: NCT07177053
Last Updated: 2025-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-30
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This randomized, open-label clinical trial aims to compare the remineralization efficacy of a fluoride-free hydroxyapatite toothpaste with a conventional fluoride toothpaste in children aged 6-12 years diagnosed with mild to moderate MIH.
Participants will be recruited from Dubai Health pediatric dental clinics, with inclusion criteria requiring at least one affected permanent molar or incisor, good general health, parental informed consent, and the child's assent. Children with systemic conditions affecting enamel or recent use of desensitizing treatments will be excluded.
Primary outcome assessment will involve Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence-QLF at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The images were analyzed using a commercial software program (Inspektor QLF 1.97, Inspektor Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to determine the change in fluorescence (ΔF, %) and extension of the lesion (area; mm2).
Secondary outcome measures will include enamel fluorescence readings using the DIAGNOdent Pen. After prophylaxis and air-drying, three readings per lesion will be recorded, with mean and peak values analyzed to monitor mineralization. Hypersensitivity in MIH-affected teeth will be assessed using air stimulus (Schiff scale) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) will be measured using age-appropriate validated questionnaires to evaluate the impact of MIH and treatment over time.
This study also responds to growing parental concerns about fluoride exposure and the demand for safer, fluoride-free alternatives. By evaluating the clinical effectiveness of hydroxyapatite toothpaste, the trial aims to inform evidence-based preventive strategies for MIH management. The findings may guide clinical practice and public health recommendations, ultimately improving oral health outcomes for affected children.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Resin Infiltration Treatment Versus a Combined Treatment With Microabrasion for the Management of MIH Affected Incisors
NCT04471571
Knowledge of Egyptian Dental Practitioners Regarding Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT04231019
HYPERSENSITIVITY IN MOLAR INCISOR HYPOMINERALISATION USING LOW LEVEL LASER IN CHILDREN
NCT06154733
Comparative Evaluation of Giomer Varnish vs Fluoride Varnish as Desensitizing Agents in Teeth With MIH
NCT05542667
Clinical Comparison of CAD/CAM Nanohybrid Composite and Hybrid Ceramic Overlays in Children With Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation
NCT06987448
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) is a qualitative enamel defect affecting up to 14% of children globally. It is associated with enamel breakdown, hypersensitivity, and increased caries risk. Fluoride is widely used for remineralization but carries risks like fluorosis. Hydroxyapatite (HAP), a biomimetic agent, has shown comparable efficacy in caries prevention and remineralization. However, there is a lack of in vivo clinical trials comparing HAP and fluoride for MIH management in children. This study addresses the need for safer, effective alternatives to fluoride in pediatric dentistry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
hydroxyapatite tooth paste [ HAP] (study group)
non fluoridated hydroxyapatite tooth paste (KAREX KINDER tooth paste)
arm 1 : hydroxyapatite tooth paste \[ HAP\] (study group): assessment will involve Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence- QLF at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The images were analyzed using a commercial software program (Inspektor QLF 1.97, Inspektor Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to determine the change in fluorescence
(ΔF, %) and extension of the lesion (area; mm2).
Fluoride-containing tooth paste [1450ppm fluoride] (control group)
fluoridated toothpaste (Colgate Total PROTECTION ACTIVE)
Arm 2 :Fluoride-containing tooth paste \[1450ppm fluoride\] (control group):
assessment will involve Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence- QLF at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The images were analyzed using a commercial software program (Inspektor QLF 1.97, Inspektor Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to determine the change in fluorescence (ΔF, %) and extension of the lesion (area; mm2).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
non fluoridated hydroxyapatite tooth paste (KAREX KINDER tooth paste)
arm 1 : hydroxyapatite tooth paste \[ HAP\] (study group): assessment will involve Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence- QLF at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The images were analyzed using a commercial software program (Inspektor QLF 1.97, Inspektor Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to determine the change in fluorescence
(ΔF, %) and extension of the lesion (area; mm2).
fluoridated toothpaste (Colgate Total PROTECTION ACTIVE)
Arm 2 :Fluoride-containing tooth paste \[1450ppm fluoride\] (control group):
assessment will involve Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence- QLF at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The images were analyzed using a commercial software program (Inspektor QLF 1.97, Inspektor Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to determine the change in fluorescence (ΔF, %) and extension of the lesion (area; mm2).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* good general health
* parental informed consent, and the child's assent
Exclusion Criteria
6 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dubai Health
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shaima Buhamer
Specialist Pediatric Dentist
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Not yet issued
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.