Stereotactic Centralized Ablative Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Arm Phase I Safety and Feasibility Study
NCT ID: NCT07173374
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE1
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-10
2028-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer With Different Biological Effective Doses
NCT04603586
Re-irradiation With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Relapsed Pancreatic Cancer
NCT02745847
Ablative Carbon Ion Radiotherapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT05424159
Safety and Efficacy of NRT6008 in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)
NCT06278454
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined With PD-1 Blockers for Locally Advanced or Locally Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer
NCT06195254
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
SCART (Stereotactic Centralized Ablative Radiation Therapy) is an innovative technique that delivers ablative radiation doses to selected intratumoral sub-volumes while maintaining lower doses at the tumor periphery. This spatial dose distribution has the potential to induce bystander effects and enhance biological efficacy beyond that achievable with uniform SBRT.
This phase I study is designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SCART dose escalation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients will be enrolled into sequential dose cohorts (10 Gy, 13 Gy, 16 Gy, and 19 Gy per fraction within the SCART region) using a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design. All patients will also receive background SBRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) covering the gross tumor volume and margin.
The primary objective is to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SCART. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), local control rate (LCR), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Exploratory analyses will investigate potential biomarkers and immune response modulation associated with SCART.
The estimated enrollment is 12-24 patients, with an accrual period of 24 months and a minimum follow-up of 12 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SCART Dose Escalation Arm
Patients will receive SCART with escalating dose cohorts (10 Gy, 13 Gy, 16 Gy, and 19 Gy per fraction within the SCART region).
SCART Dose Escalation Arm
Patients will receive SCART with escalating dose cohorts (10 Gy, 13 Gy, 16 Gy, and 19 Gy per fraction within the SCART region) using a standard 3+3 design. All patients will also receive background SBRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) to the gross tumor volume and margin.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SCART Dose Escalation Arm
Patients will receive SCART with escalating dose cohorts (10 Gy, 13 Gy, 16 Gy, and 19 Gy per fraction within the SCART region) using a standard 3+3 design. All patients will also receive background SBRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) to the gross tumor volume and margin.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1. Adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function (per laboratory criteria). Life expectancy ≥ 3 months. Signed written informed consent prior to participation.
Exclusion Criteria
Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Known history of other malignancies within the past 5 years (except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ).
Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with patient safety or compliance with the study protocol.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jinbo Yue
Director of Department Radiation Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jinbo Yue, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
Jinan, Shandong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Song CW, Kim MS, Cho LC, Dusenbery K, Sperduto PW. Radiobiological basis of SBRT and SRS. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug;19(4):570-8. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0717-z. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
Gkika E, Firat E, Adebahr S, Graf E, Popp I, Radicioni G, Lo SS, Nestle U, Nicolay NH, Niedermann G, Duda DG, Grosu AL. Systemic immune modulation by stereotactic radiotherapy in early-stage lung cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Mar 2;7(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00358-z.
Timmerman RD, Herman J, Cho LC. Emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its impact on current and future clinical practice. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 10;32(26):2847-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4675. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
Bouchart C, Navez J, Closset J, Hendlisz A, Van Gestel D, Moretti L, Van Laethem JL. Novel strategies using modern radiotherapy to improve pancreatic cancer outcomes: toward a new standard? Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Jul 7;12:1758835920936093. doi: 10.1177/1758835920936093. eCollection 2020.
Lawlor RT, Mattiolo P, Mafficini A, Hong SM, Piredda ML, Taormina SV, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Pea A, Salvia R, Kryklyva V, Shin JI, Brosens LA, Milella M, Scarpa A, Luchini C. Tumor Mutational Burden as a Potential Biomarker for Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Still-Open Questions. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;13(13):3119. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133119.
Abravan A, Faivre-Finn C, Kennedy J, McWilliam A, van Herk M. Radiotherapy-Related Lymphopenia Affects Overall Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(10):1624-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Jul 20;80(10):751-5.
Sultana A, Tudur Smith C, Cunningham D, Starling N, Tait D, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Systematic review, including meta-analyses, on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer using radiation/combined modality therapy. Br J Cancer. 2007 Apr 23;96(8):1183-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603719. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL, Goldstein D, Glimelius B, Artru P, Borbath I, Bouche O, Shannon J, Andre T, Mineur L, Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Louvet C; LAP07 Trial Group. Effect of Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Controlled After 4 Months of Gemcitabine With or Without Erlotinib: The LAP07 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1844-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4324.
Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, Rougier P, Mariette C, Bouche O, Bosset JF, Aparicio T, Mineur L, Azzedine A, Hammel P, Butel J, Stremsdoerfer N, Maingon P, Bedenne L. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1592-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn281. Epub 2008 May 7.
Loehrer PJ Sr, Feng Y, Cardenes H, Wagner L, Brell JM, Cella D, Flynn P, Ramanathan RK, Crane CH, Alberts SR, Benson AB 3rd. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;29(31):4105-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8904. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
Auclin E, Marthey L, Abdallah R, Mas L, Francois E, Saint A, Cunha AS, Vienot A, Lecomte T, Hautefeuille V, de La Fouchardiere C, Sarabi M, Ksontini F, Forestier J, Coriat R, Fabiano E, Leroy F, Williet N, Bachet JB, Tougeron D, Taieb J. Role of FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update of the AGEO cohort. Br J Cancer. 2021 Jun;124(12):1941-1948. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01341-w. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
Badiyan SN, Molitoris JK, Chuong MD, Regine WF, Kaiser A. The Role of Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer in the Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Settings. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;26(3):431-453. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 May 11.
Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvasc Res. 2007 Sep-Nov;74(2-3):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 May 18.
Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, Harris M, Reni M, Dowden S, Laheru D, Bahary N, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Hidalgo M, Goldstein D, Van Cutsem E, Wei X, Iglesias J, Renschler MF. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403.
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
Strohl MP, Raigani S, Ammori JB, Hardacre JM, Kim JA. Surgery for Localized Pancreatic Cancer: The Trend Is Not Improving. Pancreas. 2016 May-Jun;45(5):687-93. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000511.
Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155.
Klein AP. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;18(7):493-502. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00457-x. Epub 2021 May 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SDZLEC2025-283-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.