New Approaches for Evaluating the Interchangeability of Reference Materials and Quality Controls (COMET-MPL)

NCT ID: NCT07173114

Last Updated: 2025-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-22

Study Completion Date

2026-09-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medical biology tests are essential to clinical decision-making. The European Regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (EU/2017/746) requires metrological traceability of the values assigned to calibrators and quality controls, based on reference measurement methods (RMMs) or certified reference materials (CRMs). However, these references are not available for all analyses, limiting manufacturers' ability to comply with regulatory requirements.

The dissemination of traceability relies mainly on CRMs. However, to guarantee the validity of the results, these materials must have sufficient commutability, i.e., behavior comparable to that of native biological samples. This property is also required for external quality controls (EQA) used in external quality control programs. Commutability is an essential condition for avoiding matrix effects and ensuring the reliability of results.

The COMET-MPL project aims to optimize manufacturing processes for commutable, single-parameter, or multi-parameter CRMs and EQA. Evaluate the commutability of these materials in relation to patient samples.

The COMET-MPL project aims to Produce materials suitable for priority analyses: bilirubin, cyclosporine, parathyroid hormone (PTH), human cytomegalovirus, estradiol.

Commutability will be verified by comparing the performance of CRMs and EQA with that of clinical samples in several French laboratories equipped with automated systems from different manufacturers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The global in vitro diagnostics (IVD) market was valued at €91.1 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach €147.3 billion by 2030, reflecting its growing strategic importance in healthcare. Medical biology tests are central to clinical decision-making and must deliver reliable, accurate, reproducible, and standardized results across all medical laboratories.

Under Regulation (EU) 2017/746, the metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and quality control materials must be ensured through Reference Measurement Procedures (RMPs) and/or Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) of higher order. However, among the thousands of parameters routinely measured, fewer than 200 currently meet these requirements, making regulatory compliance difficult for IVD manufacturers and limiting laboratories' ability to meet ISO NF 15189 standards.

It is therefore essential to develop CRMs and External Quality Controls (EQA) that are compatible with high-throughput multiparameter analyzers used in medical laboratories. These materials must not only be traceable but also commutable, meaning they must behave similarly to native patient samples to ensure analytical validity.

The COMET-MPL project addresses this need by evaluating the interchangeability (commutability) of selected CRMs and EQA integrated into multiparametric preparations. These will be tested on automated high-throughput systems used in routine medical biology laboratories to assess their suitability as calibrators or quality controls under real-world conditions.

Each patient will participate in a single visit, during a scheduled blood draw as part of routine care. Three blood tubes will be collected, the serum will be aliquoted, and samples will be sent to partner laboratories for analysis.

The collective benefits of this study include:

* Improved patient care pathways, from initial diagnosis to therapeutic follow-up, through enhanced analytical quality of laboratory tests.
* Strengthened regulatory compliance for laboratories and IVD manufacturers.
* Availability of high metrological quality CRMs and EQA, facilitating alignment with ISO standards 15189.
* Greater reliability and comparability of biological results, contributing to more precise and equitable healthcare delivery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hospitalization All Conditions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Panel 1

Patients aged 18 years or older

No interventions assigned to this group

Panel 2

Patients aged 18 years or older receiving immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine and/or everolimus and/or tacrolimus and/or sirolimus)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Panel 1: adults ≥ 18 years of age.
* Panel 2: adults ≥ 18 years of age undergoing immunosuppressive treatment (cyclosporine, everolimus, tacrolimus, sirolimus).

Exclusion Criteria

* Protected patients (minors who are not emancipated, individuals who are unable to express their consent, etc.)
* Individuals who are not affiliated with a social security system
* Individuals under judicial protection
* Refusal to give consent to participate in the research
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Paul CRISTOL, PUPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

University Hospital, Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jean-Paul CRISTOL, PUPH

Role: CONTACT

+33 0467338314

Vincent DELATOUR, Dr

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jean-Paul CRISTOL, PUPH

Role: primary

+33 0467338314

Vincent DELATOUR, Dr

Role: backup

Jean-Paul CRISTOL, PUPH

Role: primary

Vincent DELATOUR, Dr

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL24_0369

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Remove LPS Registry
NCT05260099 WITHDRAWN
AVERT Plus Post-Market Registry
NCT02436642 TERMINATED
QStat in Liver Transplant
NCT04114253 COMPLETED