Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of Enamel Microhardness Using Tooth Whitening Agents (NCT NCT07165366)
NCT ID: NCT07165366
Last Updated: 2026-01-20
Results Overview
Vickers hardness kg f/mm2 Baseline measurements: two nonbleached bicuspids in the dental arches. One first or second bicuspid in the maxillary arch was bleached with At-Home 10% Carbamide Peroxide and the contralateral bicuspid served as the control in the maxillary arch. One first or second bicuspid in the mandibular arch was bleached with In-Office 40% Hydrogen Peroxide and the other contralateral bicuspid in the mandibular arch served as the control. The control bicuspids served as the baseline measurements.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
one month
2026-01-20
Participant Flow
Patients at the Postgraduate Department of Orthodontics at the Universidad Intercontinental were invited to participate in the study. The recruitment period began on May 1,2024
Participants were excluded who did not have prominent facial surfaces on a bicuspid in each of their four quadrants.
Unit of analysis: teeth
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control
Teeth in patients that were left untreated during the trial. (2 units)
|
OP 10% CP
Teeth in patients that were exposed to 10% Carbamide Peroxide over a consecutive 14-day period. (1 unit)
|
OP 40% HP
Teeth in patients that were exposed to 40% Hydrogen Peroxide in a single session.(1 unit)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40 80
|
40 40
|
40 40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40 80
|
40 40
|
40 40
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control
n=80 teeth
Untreated teeth
|
OP 10% CP
n=40 teeth
Teeth treated with 10% Carbamide Peroxide for 14 days
|
OP 40% HP
n=40 teeth
Teeth treated once with 40% Hydrogen Peroxide
|
Total
n=160 teeth
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
18.7 years
n=40 Participants • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP.
|
18.7 years
n=40 Participants • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP.
|
18.7 years
n=40 Participants • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP.
|
18.7 years
n=40 Participants • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
52 teeth
n=80 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
26 teeth
n=40 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
26 teeth
n=40 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
104 teeth
n=160 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
28 teeth
n=80 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
14 teeth
n=40 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
14 teeth
n=40 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
56 teeth
n=160 teeth • The total of patients was 40. Being 4 premolars analyzed for each patient. 2 teeth served as control group without treatment, 1 for OP 10% CP; and 1 OP 40% HP. The unit of measure was Vickers hardness of each teeth, measured on the buccal surfaces.
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one monthPopulation: Two teeth serve as control.
Vickers hardness kg f/mm2 Baseline measurements: two nonbleached bicuspids in the dental arches. One first or second bicuspid in the maxillary arch was bleached with At-Home 10% Carbamide Peroxide and the contralateral bicuspid served as the control in the maxillary arch. One first or second bicuspid in the mandibular arch was bleached with In-Office 40% Hydrogen Peroxide and the other contralateral bicuspid in the mandibular arch served as the control. The control bicuspids served as the baseline measurements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=80 teeth
Untreated Teeth
|
OP 10% CP
n=40 teeth
Teeth treated with 10% Carbamide Peroxide over a consecutive 14-day period.
|
OP 40% HP
n=40 teeth
Teeth treated with 40% Hydrogen Peroxide in a single session.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Enamel Hardness
|
348.4 Vickers hardness kg f/mm2
Interval 342.0 to 354.7
|
351.6 Vickers hardness kg f/mm2
Interval 341.9 to 361.2
|
354.5 Vickers hardness kg f/mm2
Interval 346.8 to 362.3
|
Adverse Events
Control
OP 10% CP
OP 40% HP
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place