Erich Arch Bars, IMF Screws and Hybrid Arch Bars in the Management of Mandibular Fractures
NCT ID: NCT07153120
Last Updated: 2025-09-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-01
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Screw Retained Arch Bar Versus Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation
NCT05401994
Validity of Computed Guided Technology in Proper Placement of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws in Mandibular Fractures
NCT06883331
Arch Bars vs. IMF (Intermaxillary Fixation) Screws: Cost Effectiveness Based on Time Duration of Device Placement.
NCT01876979
Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Using the Inverted Sequence Approach
NCT03353116
A Comparison of Stryker Hybrid Arch Bars
NCT02283528
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The conventional MMF procedure uses arch bars of malleable strips of steel-bearing hooks, also known as Erich arch bars (EABs), allowing hands-free achievement and maintenance of excellent intraoperative occlusion with reproducibility.
However, the placement of Erich arch bars (EABs) fixated to the dentition with circumdental stainless-steel wires has been the standard practice for MMF for or during the repair of mandibular fractures for many decades.
Most of these techniques are limited in the setting of poor dentition or in patients who are partially edentulous, in addition of being time consuming, and are associated with risks of mucosal, dental, and needlestick injuries.
A hybrid arch bar (HAB) for MMF has been introduced to overcome some disadvantages of conventional arch bars. The HAB differs from the EAB because they are secured directly to the alveolar bone with screws rather than using teeth for anchorage.
Some authors suggest that IMF screws are less time consuming, provide better oral hygiene and reduce the risk of needle stick injury. Conversely, IMF screws have been associated with teeth root damage and screw loosening which can compromise MMF. Despite these disadvantages, IMF screws remain a recommended alternative to traditional arch bars for management of maxillofacial trauma.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HAB Group
Hybrid Arch Bars
Screw retained titanium plates with hooks for wires are adapted properly then self drilling self locking screws will be drilled in between roots of teeth to avoid injury, after fixation both jaws will be wired to accomplish MMF
EAB Group
Erich Arch Bars
Stainless steel plates with hooks for wire placement are adapted over the facial aspect of teeth so the wires would be inserted to go around the necks of teeth (circumdental wiring), then both maxillary and mandibular plates are ligated to each other in order to achieve MMF.
IMF Screws Group
IMF Screws
A total of four self drilling screws two in the maxilla and the other two in the mandible will be inserted in the bone above and below teeth roots apices to avoid injury, to be ligated to each other in a vertical and an X pattern to achieve MMF.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erich Arch Bars
Stainless steel plates with hooks for wire placement are adapted over the facial aspect of teeth so the wires would be inserted to go around the necks of teeth (circumdental wiring), then both maxillary and mandibular plates are ligated to each other in order to achieve MMF.
Hybrid Arch Bars
Screw retained titanium plates with hooks for wires are adapted properly then self drilling self locking screws will be drilled in between roots of teeth to avoid injury, after fixation both jaws will be wired to accomplish MMF
IMF Screws
A total of four self drilling screws two in the maxilla and the other two in the mandible will be inserted in the bone above and below teeth roots apices to avoid injury, to be ligated to each other in a vertical and an X pattern to achieve MMF.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with an age range from 18:50 years old.
3. Patients free from any systemic diseases.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Edentulous patients or those with inadequate dentition for occlusal guidance
3. Pathological fractures.
4. Patients with absolute or relative contraindications to MMF (e.g. pregnancy, mental disorders and systemic diseases).
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zead Ahmad Khaled Murad Alkurdi
Clinical demonstrator at oral and maxillofacial surgery department, faculty of dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MS.25.04.16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.