Rett REVOLUTION Trial: An Exploratory Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Vorinostat in Rett Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT07150013
Last Updated: 2025-09-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE1
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-15
2026-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Key study objectives will include:
* To confirm the safety and tolerability of oral vorinostat 80mg/m2/day and 160mg/ m2/day dose levels when administered to typical Rett patients
* To identify the nature and magnitude of treatment response to vorinostat, as measured by changes in clinical and laboratory parameters indicative of trend towards benefit, as well as changes in mRNA expression (transcriptome response)
* Provide a data-driven justification for future study design and statistical analysis plan for subsequent clinical studies assessing safety and efficacy of vorinostat in Rett syndrome
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of VYNT-0126 in the Treatment of Rett Syndrome in Adult Patients
NCT05625568
ANAVEX2-73 Study in Patients With Rett Syndrome
NCT03941444
A Safety Study of NNZ-2566 in Pediatric Rett Syndrome
NCT02715115
Pharmacological Treatment of Rett Syndrome With Glatiramer Acetate (Copaxone)
NCT02153723
Study of ANAVEX2-73 in Patients With Rett Syndrome
NCT03758924
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Through use of Unravel's platform, the drug vorinostat ranked highly in predictive scoring, including when compared to trofinetide, which served as an active control in the screening evaluation (Novak, et.al., 2022). Vorinostat broadly improved both CNS and non-CNS (e.g., gastrointestinal, respiratory, inflammatory) abnormalities in a pre-clinical mouse model of Rett syndrome. Vorinostat was the first Rett syndrome treatment to demonstrate nonclinical efficacy across multiple organ systems when dosed after the onset of symptoms, and network analysis revealed a putative therapeutic mechanism for its cross-organ normalizing effects based on its impact on acetylation metabolism and post-translational modifications of microtubules, leading to the selection of vorinostat as a target candidate for further assessment in Rett syndrome.
The main hypotheses informing the goals and design of the study are as follows:
* Vorinostat is safe and tolerable when dosed in typical Rett patients at dose levels up to 160mg/m2/day
* At a molecular level, vorinostat mitigates the impact of the underlying MECP2 gene deficiency in Rett patients by restoring downstream mRNA synthesis, as measured by transcriptome data
* Vorinostat provides clinical benefit to Rett patients by reducing frequency and severity of clinical signs/symptoms and improving patient quality of life
The study is designed as an exploratory, proof of concept trial to investigate the study hypotheses as stated above and to achieve the primary goals of the trial. The study design adapts the well-known "n of 1" crossover study methodology (Guyatt, et.al., 1990, Kravitz, et.al., 2014), where each patient serves as their own control during comparative analyses of safety and efficacy. Up to 15 patients will be enrolled in the study to explore the hypothesis that vorinostat is a safe and potentially effective treatment for typical Rett syndrome.
Each patient enrolled in the study will be exposed to a 4-week placebo study phase to generate baseline data that will serve as a control as well as two active drug phases with vorinostat treatment, starting at 80mg/m2/day dosing for 8 weeks, followed by dose escalation to 160mg/m2/day for 8 weeks.
The study is designed to be single-blinded, where patients and their caregivers will not be aware of their treatment assignment in an attempt to minimize bias where practically possible, especially given the subjective nature of several of the endpoints being evaluated. Investigator, study staff, and sponsor will not be blinded to study treatment assignment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low dose interventional arm
80mg/m2/day dose vorinostat
Vorinostat (SAHA)
oral suspension
High dose interventional arm
160mg/m2/day dose vorinostat
Vorinostat (SAHA)
oral suspension
Placebo
placebo
Placebo
placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vorinostat (SAHA)
oral suspension
Placebo
placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Has typical Rett Syndrome (RTT), based on diagnostic criteria for RTT described in Neul, et.al., 2010
3. Has documented, disease causing mutation in the MeCP2 gene
4. At time of screening, is in the post-regression phase with no degradation of ambulation, hand function, speech or communication skills in the 4 months prior to screening
5. Has been on a stable regimen of medication or non-pharmacological treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit; if currently taking trofinetide (Daybue), currently on stable dose for the previous 6 months before screening visit
6. Has had a stable pattern of seizure activity for 4 weeks before screening
7. Can swallow medication or can take it by gastrostomy tube
8. Can wear actigraphy data logging device on wrist or ankle
9. If of childbearing potential, must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception during the study and for 3 months after the last study drug administration (i.e., abstinence from sexual activity, hormonal contraceptives associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine device, intrauterine hormone-releasing system)
10. Subjects or their legally authorized representative must be able to provide an informed consent and have sufficient language skill to complete caregiver assessments in the language in which the study assessments are provided
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has major surgery planned during the study period
3. Pregnant or nursing women
4. Has a history of brain injury, stroke, other cerebrovascular disease or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
5. Has clinically significant abnormal vital signs at screening or baseline
6. Has an abnormal ECG at screening, including clinically significant QT prolongation
7. Has a clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at screening
8. Liver disease or transaminase levels \> 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range as determined during screening
9. Has a history of malignancy of any organ system within the past 5 years before screening
10. Is participating in or has participated in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to the screening visit
11. Has been treated with growth hormone, IGF-1, or insulin within 12 weeks of baseline
12. Is taking anticoagulant therapy or other HDAC inhibitors
13. Has had any change to their medication or non-pharmacological treatment within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit
14. Life expectancy of less than 12 months.
15. Has a history of alcoholism or drug/chemical abuse within 2 years before screening.
16. In the investigator's opinion, is inappropriate for this study for any reason
6 Years
21 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unravel Biosciences, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neal I Muni, M.D., MSPH
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Unravel Biosciences, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Grupo de Investigación Clínica PECET (GIC-PECET)
Medellín, , Colombia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20251104495
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RVL-001 Study 002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.