Social Skills in Chronic Pain, Addiction, Intimate Partner Violence and Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT07145528
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-01
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objectives: Compare the level of psychosocial skills in patients presenting with a use disorder or chronic pain or being victims or perpetrators of domestic violence or patients followed in a primary care center without any of these histories, using the score obtained after passing a scale currently being validated in an adult population.
Secondary objectives Describe profiles of social skills dysfunction within each population Evaluate the link between alterations in CPS in the different populations and different sociodemographic, intrinsic or environmental criteria
Type of study: multicenter comparative cross-sectional study
Number of centers: twelve (6 multi-professional primary care health centers - 6 hospital centers)
Study description: Cross-sectional, multicenter study. The patients will be included consecutively over a one-year period at the time of their visit to the inclusion center.
Primary endpoint: score obtained for each of the 4 axes on the ad hoc psychosocial skills assessment test.
Number of subjects: 600 patients (60 in each group)
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 18 and over,
* Patients with chronic pain lasting at least 6 months,
* Patients with alcohol dependence,
* Patients victims of intra-family violence,
* Patients who commit intra-family violence,
* Patients followed in primary care and not presenting any of the 4 previous items,
Study procedure: each participant, regardless of population, will receive a single 45-minute interview consisting of a validated psychosocial skills assessment test, and a record of consumption status and medico-socio-economic history.
Data will be collected directly online, and the main analysis will be based on a comparative analysis of the level of social skills between the different groups for each of the four axes of the social skills assessment test.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevalence of the Victimization and the Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence Among the Patients From Puy-de-Dôme and Paris Consulting or Being Hospitalized for Addiction Problems and Their Expectations From General Practitioners (VIA-MG)
NCT05163171
Psychosocial Support for Acute Hospital Pain and Distress
NCT02590029
Problem Solving Skills Training For Parent Caregivers of Youth With Chronic Pain
NCT01496378
Self Defining Memories in Women Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.
NCT03906487
Self-Dehumanization and Hesitation to Report Domestic Violence
NCT07015502
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Social skills provide the conditions for modulating and controlling emotions, improving individual and social skills, making appropriate decisions, and resisting social conflicts. Poor social skills are linked to psychological disorders and psychiatric disorders such as mood disorders. Dysfunctions in social skills in adults are linked to substance use and abuse, sensitivity to pain, control of violence, and being a victim of violence. The links are bidirectional: both causes and consequences.
I
Objectives:
Main objective Compare the level of psychosocial skills in patients presenting with a use disorder or chronic pain or being victims or perpetrators of domestic violence or patients followed in a primary care center without any of these histories, using the score obtained after passing a scale currently being validated in an adult population,
Secondary objectives Describe profiles of social skills dysfunction within each population Evaluate the link between alterations in CPS in the different populations and different sociodemographic (gender, age, geographical area), intrinsic (executive functions) or environmental criteria (childhood trauma, precariousness...).
Type of study: multicenter comparative cross-sectional study
Number of centers: twelve (6 multi-professional primary care health centers - 6 hospital centers)
Study description: This is a cross-sectional, multicenter study in the RIPH 2 category. The patients will be included consecutively over a one-year period at the time of their visit to the emergency department. This is an interventional study in that a questionnaire will be administered, asking questions about sensitive data. There will be no follow-up.
Primary endpoint: score obtained for each of the four axes on the ad hoc psychosocial skills assessment test.
Number of subjects: 600 patients (60 in each group)
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 18 and over,
* Patients with chronic pain lasting at least 6 months,
* Patients with alcohol dependence,
* Patients victims of intra-family violence,
* Patients who commit intra-family violence,
* Patients followed in primary care and not presenting any of the 4 previous items,
Non inclusion criteria Patients not fluent in French, Patients with an unstabilized psychiatric disorder, Patients refusing to participate in the study. Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme, Subjects participating in another interventional research study with an exclusion period still in progress at the time of inclusion.
Patients deprived of liberty, under guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice.
Pregnant and breast-feeding women
Study procedure: each participant, regardless of population, will receive a single 45-minute interview consisting of a validated psychosocial skills assessment test, and a record of consumption status and medico-socio-economic history.
Data will be collected directly online, and the main analysis will be based on a comparative analysis of the level of social skills between the different groups for each of the four axes of the social skills assessment test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients in Primary Care
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Patients with chronic pain
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Patients victims of violence
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Patients perpetrators of violence
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Patients with alcohol dependence
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catherine Laporte, Pr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A00933-44
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.