Comparison of Diaphragm Ultrasound and RSBI for Predicting Weaning Success in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients

NCT ID: NCT07120438

Last Updated: 2025-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-31

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound compared to the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) in determining weaning success among mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU for more than 48 hours.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Which is more effective in predicting weaning success: diaphragmatic ultrasound (including Diaphragmatic Excursion \[DE\] and Diaphragm Thickening Fraction \[DTF\]) or RSBI, in patients ventilated \>48 hours in the ICU of Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta?

Participants will be adult ICU patients who are undergoing weaning from mechanical ventilation after more than 48 hours. Before extubation, each participant will undergo diaphragmatic ultrasound assessment to measure DE and DTF, along with RSBI measurement. The predictive accuracy of these parameters will be evaluated by comparing them with the actual weaning outcomes.

Secondary objectives include:

1. Assessing whether diaphragmatic ultrasound is associated with a higher weaning success rate than RSBI.
2. Evaluating the correlation between DE values and successful weaning.
3. Determining the optimal cutoff values of DE and DTF as predictors of weaning failure.
4. Analyzing the incidence of weaning failure in patients who do not meet optimal diaphragm function criteria.
5. Identifying DE and DTF thresholds that may help reduce the risk of reintubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This observational cohort study aims to investigate the diagnostic utility of diaphragm ultrasound (specifically diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF)) as alternative weaning predictors in adult ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Given the limitations of the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) in predicting weaning outcomes, ultrasound-based parameters offer a promising physiological assessment tool by directly evaluating diaphragmatic function.

Diaphragm ultrasound will be performed within a defined period prior to planned weaning, following standardized imaging protocols to obtain DE and DTF measurements. All ultrasound assessments will be conducted by trained clinicians using point-of-care ultrasound devices available in the ICU. These values will be compared with the corresponding RSBI obtained as part of routine care, without interfering with the clinical decision-making process.

The study will analyze predictive accuracy metrics (such as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) to compare RSBI with diaphragm ultrasound indices. Subgroup analyses will assess the relationship between suboptimal diaphragm function and weaning failure, as well as evaluate threshold values of DE and DTF that may serve as reliable predictors for extubation outcomes. The study will also explore how these indices correlate with rates of reintubation and prolonged weaning.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilator Weaning Mechanical Ventilation Respiratory Insufficiency Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Care Unit Intensive Care Unit Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ICU Patients on Mechanical Ventilation >48 Hours

This cohort includes adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) who have been on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Each participant undergoes assessment using both the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) and diaphragm ultrasonography, including measurements of diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF). These assessments are conducted prior to extubation to evaluate their predictive accuracy in determining weaning success or failure.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who have been on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours
2. Adult patients aged ≥18 years
3. Patients who meet the criteria for hemodynamic stability for weaning
4. Patients or their families have provided written informed consent
5. Patients with FiO₂ \< 50%, PEEP level \< 5 cm H₂O, respiratory rate \< 30 breaths per minute, PaO₂/FiO₂ \> 200, and GCS \> 13
6. Patients who have successfully completed the Spontaneous Awakening Trial (SAT) and Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with neuromuscular disorders, anatomical abnormalities of the diaphragm, or diaphragmatic palsy
2. Patients with a history of severe thoracic trauma affecting diaphragm function on one or both sides
3. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gadjah Mada University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Meta Restu Synthana

Fellow in Intensive Care

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Meta Restu Synthana, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

6281215621213

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

METAKIC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.