Retrospective Study on the Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With mRCC and Renal Failure

NCT ID: NCT07117409

Last Updated: 2025-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-29

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study aimed to compare the toxicity of Nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated in line II and III stratified into 3 patient groups:

* patients with normal or mildly reduced renal function (GFR\<90 and ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2);
* patients with moderate renal impairment (GFR \<60 e ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m\^2),
* patients with severe renal impairment (GFR \<30 e ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2) Patients must have been treated with Nivolumab, as per clinical practice. All patients who have received at least one drug administration between february 2017 to December 31, 2018 will be enrolled in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The treatment of metastatic renal cancer has undergone several changes in recent years especially regarding second line treatment which has seen the development of new ones antiangiogenic drugs such as cabozantinib and immunotherapy with inhibitory checkpoints (nivolumab). Nivolumab is a human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor 'programmed-death' 1 (PD-1) by blocking its interaction with its ligand (PD-L1). The PD-1 receptor has an action negative regulatory on T lymphocyte activity, the interaction between receptor and ligand (PD-L1) expressed by cancer cells involves inhibition of T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion. The metabolism of Nivolumab was not well characterized, although it is probably degraded into small peptides and amino acids through catabolic pathways similar way to endogenous IgG; all this is important as there is no involvement by normal excretory/emuntory organs such as liver and kidney. The patient affected by metastatic renal cell carcinoma presents more frequently than a subject of the same sex and age a picture of concomitant renal insufficiency (IR); this data could be linked to age median at diagnosis (65 years), high incidence of diabetes and arterial hypertension, and presence of a previous nephrectomy .Renal impairment (IR) is classified as: - mild (glomerular filtrate (GFR) \<90 and ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2); - moderate (GFR \<60 and ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m\^2), or severe (GFR \<30 and ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2) Some pharmacokinetic analyses have been conducted for patients with mild renal impairment or moderate who have not documented clinically detected differences in clearance of Nivolumab compared to patients with normal renal function; however this is a number very modest number of patients with moderate IR and an even more limited number of patients with severe IR such that these results cannot be considered conclusive; the studies in fact, registrars did not include patients with severe IR or on dialysis. Only some case reports of patients with severe renal insufficiency treated are described in the literature with inhibitory immunocheckpoints without this leading to aggravation of renal function baseline or changes efficacy or toxicity; however few of these reported cases involve patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. And' instead, a case of a patient with renal neoplasm in hemodialysis treatment with benefit in terms of objective response from nivolumab therapy. it is also known from the analysis conducted on patients treated with nivolumab within the EAP in Italy, that this drug has a benefit in terms of effectiveness and safety even for older patients, who represent only a small share of the population of pivotal studies; such patients may more frequently have both by age and by comorbidity a reduction in basic renal function. Aim of our retrospective study is to assess whether there are differences in the profile of toxicity in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with Nivolumab in line II or III based on renal function. Patients will be stratified in 3 patient groups:

* patients with normal or mildly reduced renal function (GFR\<90 and ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2);
* patients with moderate renal failure (GFR \<60 e ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m\^2),
* patients with severe renal failure (GFR \<30 e ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with normal or mildly reduced renal function (GFR<90 and ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m^2)

No interventions assigned to this group

Patients with moderate renal failure (GFR <60 e ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m^2)

No interventions assigned to this group

Patients with severe renal failure (GFR <30 e ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m^2)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* signing informed consent, in case of patients still alive;
* histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma;
* at least one administration of Nivolumab therapy, in the second-or third line of treatment february 2017 to December 31, 2018;
* availability of inpatient and/or outpatient medical records for clinical data collection.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who have received immunotherapy under EAP (Expanded Access Programm) or other clinical trials;
* dialysis patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda USL IRCCS di Reggio Emilia

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Masini C, Vitale MG, Maruzzo M, Procopio G, de Giorgi U, Buti S, Rossetti S, Iacovelli R, Atzori F, Cosmai L, Vignani F, Prati G, Scagliarini S, Guida A, Berselli A, Pinto C. Safety and Efficacy of Pazopanib in First-Line Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma With or Without Renal Failure: CORE-URO-01 Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e150-e155. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30396828 (View on PubMed)

Gupta S, Parsa V, Heilbrun LK, Smith DW, Dickow B, Heath E, Vaishampayan U. Safety and efficacy of molecularly targeted agents in patients with metastatic kidney cancer with renal dysfunction. Anticancer Drugs. 2011 Sep;22(8):794-800. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328346af0d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21799472 (View on PubMed)

Wanchoo R, Karam S, Uppal NN, Barta VS, Deray G, Devoe C, Launay-Vacher V, Jhaveri KD; Cancer and Kidney International Network Workgroup on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Adverse Renal Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Narrative Review. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(2):160-169. doi: 10.1159/000455014. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28076863 (View on PubMed)

Vitale MG, Scagliarini S, Galli L, Pignata S, Lo Re G, Berruti A, Defferrari C, Spada M, Masini C, Santini D, Ciuffreda L, Ruggeri EM, Bengala C, Livi L, Fagnani D, Bonetti A, Giustini L, Hamzaj A, Procopio G, Caserta C, Sabbatini R. Efficacy and safety data in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma included in the nivolumab Expanded Access Program (EAP) in Italy. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199642. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29979712 (View on PubMed)

Carlo MI, Feldman DR. Response to Nivolumab in a Patient With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and End-stage Renal Disease on Dialysis. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1082-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.040. Epub 2016 Jun 13. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27311362 (View on PubMed)

Herz S, Hofer T, Papapanagiotou M, Leyh JC, Meyenburg S, Schadendorf D, Ugurel S, Roesch A, Livingstone E, Schilling B, Franklin C. Checkpoint inhibitors in chronic kidney failure and an organ transplant recipient. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;67:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27614165 (View on PubMed)

Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Aren Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, Plimack ER, Barthelemy P, Porta C, George S, Powles T, Donskov F, Neiman V, Kollmannsberger CK, Salman P, Gurney H, Hawkins R, Ravaud A, Grimm MO, Bracarda S, Barrios CH, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Rini BI, Chen AC, Mekan S, McHenry MB, Wind-Rotolo M, Doan J, Sharma P, Hammers HJ, Escudier B; CheckMate 214 Investigators. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1277-1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29562145 (View on PubMed)

Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu LA, Waxman IM, Sharma P; CheckMate 025 Investigators. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26406148 (View on PubMed)

Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, Mainwaring PN, Rini BI, Donskov F, Hammers H, Hutson TE, Lee JL, Peltola K, Roth BJ, Bjarnason GA, Geczi L, Keam B, Maroto P, Heng DY, Schmidinger M, Kantoff PW, Borgman-Hagey A, Hessel C, Scheffold C, Schwab GM, Tannir NM, Motzer RJ; METEOR Investigators. Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1814-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26406150 (View on PubMed)

Decastro GJ, McKiernan JM. Epidemiology, clinical staging, and presentation of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am. 2008 Nov;35(4):581-92; vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.07.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18992612 (View on PubMed)

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26742998 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

622/2019/OSS/IRCCSRE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cabozantinib In Combo With NIVO + IPI In Advanced NCCRCC
NCT04413123 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2