BMS-936558 (MDX-1106) In Subjects With Advanced/Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

NCT ID: NCT01354431

Last Updated: 2022-05-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2021-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to measure how active BMS-936558 (nivolumab) is against Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) as measured by the disease not progressing and whether a dose response relationship exists.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: nivolumab - 0.3 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nivolumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Solution, Intravenous (IV), 0.3 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (Q 3 weeks), Until Progressive disease (PD), toxicity or discontinue for other reasons

Arm 2: nivolumab - 2.0 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nivolumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Solution, Intravenous (IV), 2.0 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (Q 3 weeks), Until Progressive disease (PD), toxicity or discontinue for other reasons

Arm 3: nivolumab - 10.0 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nivolumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Solution, Intravenous (IV), 10.0 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (Q 3 weeks), Until Progressive disease (PD), toxicity or discontinue for other reasons

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nivolumab

Solution, Intravenous (IV), 0.3 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (Q 3 weeks), Until Progressive disease (PD), toxicity or discontinue for other reasons

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

nivolumab

Solution, Intravenous (IV), 2.0 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (Q 3 weeks), Until Progressive disease (PD), toxicity or discontinue for other reasons

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

nivolumab

Solution, Intravenous (IV), 10.0 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (Q 3 weeks), Until Progressive disease (PD), toxicity or discontinue for other reasons

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS-936558 BMS-936558 BMS-936558

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologic confirmation of Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a clear cell component
* Previous treatment with at least one anti-angiogenic agent
* Progressed within 6 months of study enrollment
* Subjects should not have had more than 3 prior treatments for locally advanced or metastatic disease
* Must have available tumor tissue for submission
* Subjects must also meet various laboratory parameters for inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with any active autoimmune disease or a history of known autoimmune disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ono Pharma USA Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSD Moores Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Ucla

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Inst.

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Cancer Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University Of Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Georgetown University Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University Feinberg School Of Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Health Melvin And Bren Simon Cancer Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University Of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University Of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

The Bunting-Blaustein Cancer Research Building

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Ctr.

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University Of Michigan Medical Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Wayne State University

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Masonic Cancer Ctr, University Of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

North Mississippi Hematology And Oncology Associates, Ltd

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

St. Luke'S Roosevelt Hospital Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Blumenthal Cancer Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University Of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University Of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Oncology, PLLC

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Ctr

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Washington - Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Wheaton Franciscan Health Care

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Centre D'Oncologie Dr-Leon-Richard

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

London Regional Cancer Program

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Montreal-Notre-Dame Hosp

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Local Institution

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Finland Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

George S, Motzer RJ, Hammers HJ, Redman BG, Kuzel TM, Tykodi SS, Plimack ER, Jiang J, Waxman IM, Rini BI. Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated Beyond Progression: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;2(9):1179-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0775.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27243803 (View on PubMed)

Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF, Redman BG, Kuzel TM, Harrison MR, Vaishampayan UN, Drabkin HA, George S, Logan TF, Margolin KA, Plimack ER, Lambert AM, Waxman IM, Hammers HJ. Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 1;33(13):1430-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0703. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25452452 (View on PubMed)

George S, Pili R, Carducci MA, Kim JJ. Role of immunotherapy for renal cell cancer in 2011. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Sep 1;9(9):1011-8. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0085.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21917625 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CA209-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cabozantinib In Combo With NIVO + IPI In Advanced NCCRCC
NCT04413123 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2