Deimplementation of Inappropriate Feeding Practices in Early Care and Education Settings

NCT ID: NCT07107321

Last Updated: 2025-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2640 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-12

Study Completion Date

2029-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Arkansas and Louisiana have among the highest rates of adult obesity in the United States at 38.7% and 38.6%, respectively. Prevention and intervention efforts are needed to reduce the number of children who will become obese adults and suffer the host of negative health consequences that accompany it. This proposal will develop and test strategies to stop the use of detrimental feeding practices by early childhood educators which promote unhealthy weight trajectories, inappropriate eating behaviors and poor dietary outcomes for children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The long-term goal is to accelerate the implementation of evidence-based feeding practices in ECE settings that support healthy weight trajectories and diets for young children. The overall objective for this application, which is in response to PAR-22-105, is to determine the effectiveness and associated mechanisms of a package of deimplementation strategies to reduce the use of inappropriate feeding practices in ECE. The co-designed package of de-implementation strategies in this project will test includes six complimentary strategies. Three are foundational strategies that all educators will receive: training, a peer learning collaborative, and facilitation; three strategies are tailored to each educator's preferences for support and individual goals: audit and feedback, reminders, and educational resources. These six strategies will simultaneously support the removal of inappropriate practices and the uptake of alternative EBPs. To accomplish this goal, the strategies will target trust as a key mechanism for change, consistent with the Implementation Trust Building Theory of Change.

The rationale for the proposed project is that demonstrating the effectiveness of strategies for reducing inappropriate feeding practices in ECE and determining how the strategies work and for whom will provide new opportunities for their continued development and dissemination. In turn, these strategies will contribute to a strong foundation for lifelong healthy eating habits for children being served in ECE. This project includes a cluster-randomized Hybrid Type III trial with 88 ECE sites serving children ages 3 and 5. The trial will achieve two specific aims:

Aim 1: Determine the effectiveness of a package of deimplementation strategies for reducing the use of inappropriate feeding practices in ECE. The hypothesis is that, compared to usual practice, the deimplementation strategies will be effective at reducing the total number of observed inappropriate feeding practices per meal, our primary deimplementation outcome (N= 88 sites, 528 educators). This project will also identify effects on secondary effectiveness outcome measures including child body mass index, willingness to try new foods, fear of new foods (i.e., neophobia), and dietary intake (N=1320 children).

Aim 2: Identify mechanisms of deimplementation using a mixed methods approach. The hypothesis is that factors specified by the Implementation Trust Building Theory of Change22 will mediate the effect of strategies on deimplementation outcomes. Using an explanatory, sequential design, we will collect qualitative data with purposively selected educators (N = 32) to identify emergent mediators and moderators.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity, Childhood

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

WISE Words

Bundle of deimplementation strategies including training, peer learning collaborative, external facilitation, audit and feedback, environmental reminders, and educational materials

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

WISE Words

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

WISE Words is a co-designed, multicomponent deimplementation strategy package including 6 discrete strategies. Of these, three are delivered in a standard fashion: (1) dynamic training driven by improvisation methods, (2) a peer learning collaborative, and (3) external facilitation. The additional three are tailored to each educator's preferences and goals: (4) reminders, (5) educational materials, and (6) audit and feedback. Educators are supported to set and achieve goals for one feeding practice they want to stop and one they want to start.

Standard educational practice

Usual practice in ECE does not require a standard approach to nutrition education, and implementation varies based on the discretion of the site and/or educator.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

WISE Words

WISE Words is a co-designed, multicomponent deimplementation strategy package including 6 discrete strategies. Of these, three are delivered in a standard fashion: (1) dynamic training driven by improvisation methods, (2) a peer learning collaborative, and (3) external facilitation. The additional three are tailored to each educator's preferences and goals: (4) reminders, (5) educational materials, and (6) audit and feedback. Educators are supported to set and achieve goals for one feeding practice they want to stop and one they want to start.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sites within a 100-mile radius of staff offices serving 12+ children ages 3 to 5 years
* Agreeing to participate in data collection
* Sites will serve meals.
* All classrooms at a site will receive the same deimplementation strategies and participate in data collection. We will select one classroom at random per site to participate in the collection of child outcomes (N= 264 classrooms, 15 children per classroom= 1320 children total).

Exclusion Criteria

* We will exclude sites that have participated in intervention studies with our team in the last 3 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Louisiana Tech University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01DK138153

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

276116:

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Testing LEIFc in the Community
NCT06898190 COMPLETED NA
The Play With Me Study
NCT04280198 COMPLETED NA
Prevention of Childhood Obesity
NCT00788203 COMPLETED
Pediatric Healthy Weight Clinic
NCT05020314 COMPLETED NA