The Efficacy and Safety of First-line Treatment Combined With Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Single Center, Real-world Study

NCT ID: NCT07078292

Last Updated: 2025-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-01

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In recent years, immunotherapy represented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has continuously brought breakthroughs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and has gradually become the cornerstone of advanced liver cancer treatment. With positive results from the IMbrave-150 study, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been approved for first-line treatment of advanced HCC. Subsequently, multiple immune combination therapy regimens were approved one after another, enriching the first-line treatment options for advanced HCC. At present, combination therapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors has become the mainstream first-line treatment for advanced HCC, and three main treatment modes have been formed: immune combined with bevacizumab, immune combined with TKI, and immune combined with immunity.

Multiple immune combination therapy regimens have shown a flourishing trend in clinical trials, which has brought some thought-provoking issues to the clinical practice of first-line treatment for advanced HCC. On the one hand, the above studies all used sorafenib/lenvatinib monotherapy as a control, lacking a "head to head" comparison. In real-world scenarios, how to choose between different treatment options depends on the judgment of clinical doctors and drug accessibility, lacking support from research data. On the other hand, the ORR of immune combination therapy is between 20% and 40%, and there are still a large number of patients who have initial treatment resistance to the above regimen and cannot achieve satisfactory therapeutic effects. How to accurately predict/identify the response of different populations to different treatment regimens, and then carry out personalized treatment, is also an important issue facing the first-line treatment of advanced HCC. In addition to systemic anti-tumor therapy, local treatment (such as TACE, HAIC, ablation, radiotherapy, etc.) and surgical treatment are also advantageous weapons for treating advanced HCC, complementing systemic treatment to further improve the prognosis of advanced HCC. However, more clinical research evidence is still needed to support the clinical efficacy data of local treatment combined with systemic treatment in the field of advanced HCC treatment.

Based on the above clinical issues, this study intends to retrospectively and prospectively collect advanced HCC patients who receive first-line immunotherapy in our center, explore the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the real world, and reveal the advantageous treatment populations of different immunotherapy regimens (immune+bevacizumab, immune+TKI, immune+immune) in the real world, in order to provide some data reference for the first-line treatment population and regimen selection of advanced HCC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Real World Study

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immunotherapy combined with bevacizumab ± TACE/HAIC

No interventions assigned to this group

immunotherapy combined with TKI ± TACE/HAIC

No interventions assigned to this group

immunotherapy combined with immunotherapy ± TACE/HAIC

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old, male or female not limited
* Non resectable HCC patients diagnosed by tissue/cytology or imaging that meets the diagnostic criteria for HCC
* There must be at least one measurable lesion (RECIST 1.1)
* Use immunotherapy combination therapy as first-line treatment, including atezolizumab+bevacizumab, sintilizumab+bevacizumab analogs, carrelizumab+apatinib, lenvatinib+tirelizumab or sintilizumab, with or without local treatment (including but not limited to TACE, HAIC)
* Have not received systematic anti-tumor treatment in the past
* Child Pugh 5-7 points
* ECOG PS 0-1 points
* Prospective cohort requires patients to have at least one imaging tumor evaluation since baseline;

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of baseline data and post-treatment imaging data
* With other malignant tumors
* Merge severe cardiovascular diseases and uncontrollable infections
* Existence of any active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune disease Expected survival period\<3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E20250416

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.