The Relation of the Anatomic Morphology of Lumbar Transverse Processes and the Success Rate of Facet Joint Radiofrequency Denervation
NCT ID: NCT07076810
Last Updated: 2025-08-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-01
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Facet Joint Injections
NCT06325631
Effectiveness of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy Guided S1 Injections and Radiofrequency
NCT05247892
Evaluation Of Three Different Anagesic Techniques In Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fixation Surgery
NCT06801574
Ultrasonographic Muscles and Fascia Measurement With Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT05359523
The Effect of Central Sensitization in Radicular Pain in Patients With Failed Low Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT06508918
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients' gender, age, body mass index, and the duration of pain will be recorded. Patients' pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The NRS asks patients to rate their pain intensity between 0 and 10. 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the highest pain they can imagine. Patients' NRS scores and ODI scores at rest and during activity will be recorded before and 1 month after the RFA procedure. A 40% or greater reduction in ODI score will be defined as "significant benefit from the procedure." The angles of the superior articular and transverse processes at the bilateral L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels, as well as the angles of the facet joint in the axial plane, will be calculated from Lumbar Spine Computed Tomography images taken during the diagnosis and treatment processes. No additional imaging will be required for this study; the data will be obtained from the patients' previously obtained lumbar spine CT images.
Patients will be divided into two groups for each level: "greater angle" and "lesser angle," based on the angles specified above. Post-procedure pain scores and the rate of significant benefit from the procedure will be compared. Patients will be evaluated one month after the procedure for pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index. Furthermore, a correlation will be investigated between the reduction in pain scores at each level and the specified angles. Statistical analyses of the study will be conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. Data obtained by counting will be expressed as numbers and percentages, and data obtained by measurement will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The Student t-test will be used for parameters showing normal distribution in comparisons of descriptive statistical methods and quantitative data, and the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for parameters not showing normal distribution. The chi-square test will be used for comparisons of qualitative data.
The relationship between changes in pain scores and the anatomical angles evaluated in the study will be assessed using the Pearson Correlation Test. A P value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
This cross-sectional, observational study will not interfere with the patients' routine treatment protocols.
Sample Size and Statistical Methods: Statistical analyses of the study will be conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 26. Data obtained by counting will be expressed as numbers and percentages, and data obtained by measurement will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The Student t-test will be used for normally distributed parameters when comparing descriptive statistical methods and quantitative data, and the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for non-normally distributed parameters. The chi-square test will be used for comparisons of qualitative data. The relationship between changes in pain scores and the anatomical angles evaluated in the study will be assessed using the Pearson Correlation Test. A P value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group High
Lumbar facet joints medial branch nerve radiofrequency ablation
Patients will be positioned prone on the operation table. Intravenous access is opened. Monitorization for vital signs is performed. Light sedation with midazolam is performed. Under fluoroscopic guidance, medial branch nerve of each lumbar facet joint is found by searching the specific response to the stimulations of the radiofrequency needle. When the tip of the radiofrequency needle is close enough to the corresponding medial branch nerve, ablation with 80 degrees Celsius for 90 seconds is performed. Average 6-10 nerves are ablated in each procedure and the average duration of the procedure is 20-60 minutes.
Lumbar facet joints medial branch nerve radiofrequency ablation
Patients are positioned prone on the operation table. Intravenous access is opened and monitorization of vital signs is applied. Skin is cleaned by povidone iodine solution. Light sedation is applied by midazolam. Lumbar vertebral region is seen under C-arm fluoroscopic view. Medial branch nerve of the lumbar facet joints is searched by 22 G width, 10-cm length radiofrequency needles. When the needle tip is close enough to the nerve, an 80 Celsius, 90-second radiofrequency ablation is applied. In each procedure, average 5-10 nerves is ablated and the duration of the procedure is 20-60 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar facet joints medial branch nerve radiofrequency ablation
Patients will be positioned prone on the operation table. Intravenous access is opened. Monitorization for vital signs is performed. Light sedation with midazolam is performed. Under fluoroscopic guidance, medial branch nerve of each lumbar facet joint is found by searching the specific response to the stimulations of the radiofrequency needle. When the tip of the radiofrequency needle is close enough to the corresponding medial branch nerve, ablation with 80 degrees Celsius for 90 seconds is performed. Average 6-10 nerves are ablated in each procedure and the average duration of the procedure is 20-60 minutes.
Lumbar facet joints medial branch nerve radiofrequency ablation
Patients are positioned prone on the operation table. Intravenous access is opened and monitorization of vital signs is applied. Skin is cleaned by povidone iodine solution. Light sedation is applied by midazolam. Lumbar vertebral region is seen under C-arm fluoroscopic view. Medial branch nerve of the lumbar facet joints is searched by 22 G width, 10-cm length radiofrequency needles. When the needle tip is close enough to the nerve, an 80 Celsius, 90-second radiofrequency ablation is applied. In each procedure, average 5-10 nerves is ablated and the duration of the procedure is 20-60 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Reluctance to participate in the study
* Severe anatomic deformation in lumbar vertebral region
* Presence or suspicion of pregnancy
* Inability to answer the questions of the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mustafa Kurçaloğlu
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014.
Konin GP, Walz DM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Nov;31(10):1778-86. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2036. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
Guan W, Yu W, Lin Q, Zhang Z, Du G, Tian J, Xu Y, Hsieh E. Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images. J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
Erken E, Ozer HT, Gulek B, Durgun B. The association between cervical rib and sacralization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 1;27(15):1659-64. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208010-00013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OMÜ KAEК 2025/252
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.