Contrast Compression Therapy for Post-Stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT07062913
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-01
2023-01-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, eligible patients with post-stroke CRPS type I were randomly assigned to receive either conventional rehabilitation alone or combined with contrast compression therapy. The intervention included 10 sessions of sequential thermal phases with pneumatic compression applied to the affected upper limb, delivered with a specialized device in addition to standard therapy.
The primary outcome measures were pain level and edema volume. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery, spasticity, clinical motor recovery, and neuropathic pain assessments. This study aims to contribute new evidence about whether contrast compression therapy offers additional benefits for managing post-stroke CRPS.\*
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Kinesiotaping and Night Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndome
NCT04993703
Comparison of the Efficacy of High Intensity Laser Therapy and Low Level Laser Therapy in the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT06219876
Impact of Compression Garments on Pain in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of the Upper Limbs.
NCT05034835
Surgical Dressings After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT04070924
Different Treatment Approaches for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT07048379
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Clinically, post-stroke CRPS is characterized by severe pain involving both the shoulder and wrist, accompanied by symptoms such as edema, warmth, redness, limited range of motion, tenderness in the metacarpophalangeal joints, and in later stages, joint contractures that may cause significant functional impairment. The chronic nature of CRPS can lead to substantial limitations in upper extremity use, prolonged hospital stays, dependency in daily living activities, and increased overall rehabilitation costs, thereby reducing patients' quality of life.
Although various conservative treatments-including pharmacological agents, physical therapy, contrast water therapy (CWT), and sympathetic nerve blocks-are frequently used, the effectiveness, long-term safety, and accessibility of standardized treatment protocols remain limited. Traditional contrast water therapy aims to stimulate circulation and modulate inflammation by alternating vasodilation and vasoconstriction phases; however, modern contrast compression therapy enhances this principle by combining sequential thermal stimulation with active pneumatic compression. This combination aims to improve not only peripheral circulation but also lymphatic drainage and tissue oxygenation.
Contrast compression therapy has gained popularity in recent years, especially in orthopedic and sports rehabilitation, due to its potential benefits in controlling pain and edema. Technological advancements have enabled these systems to deliver precisely regulated temperature, pressure, and treatment durations, allowing for a more controlled and personalized approach compared to conventional methods. Despite promising results in musculoskeletal applications, no clinical trial to date has specifically evaluated the effects of contrast compression therapy in the neurological rehabilitation context, particularly for patients with post-stroke CRPS.
Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate whether adding contrast compression therapy to conventional rehabilitation provides additional benefits for pain control, edema reduction, functional recovery, and motor improvement in patients diagnosed with post-stroke CRPS, aiming to address an important gap in the current literature.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Rehabilitation Group
Conventional Rehabilitation
A standard rehabilitation program including positioning, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Contrast Compression Therapy Group
Contrast Compression Therapy
Contrast compression therapy using a Game Ready® MED4 ELITE device applied to the affected upper extremity with sequential hot and cold phases and pneumatic compression.
Conventional Rehabilitation
Same standard rehabilitation program as in the control group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional Rehabilitation
A standard rehabilitation program including positioning, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Contrast Compression Therapy
Contrast compression therapy using a Game Ready® MED4 ELITE device applied to the affected upper extremity with sequential hot and cold phases and pneumatic compression.
Conventional Rehabilitation
Same standard rehabilitation program as in the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* First-ever stroke diagnosed within the previous 12 months
* Diagnosis of upper-extremity complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) according to the Budapest clinical criteria
* Subacute-stage CRPS affecting the upper limb
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 23
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Hemispatial neglect
* Sensory or motor aphasia
* Shoulder subluxation
* CRPS due to causes other than stroke
* Bilateral CRPS-I
* History of psychotic disorder
* Coexisting neuropathic pain syndromes (e.g., diabetic neuropathy)
* Presence of open wounds in the treatment area
25 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Meltem Gunes Akinci
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Meltem Gunes Akinci
Assistant Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara City Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E2-21-527
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.