Contrast Compression Therapy for Post-Stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT07062913

Last Updated: 2025-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of contrast compression therapy as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation in patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following stroke. Post-stroke CRPS, previously known as shoulder-hand syndrome, is a challenging condition that affects upper extremity function and quality of life. Although various conservative treatments such as medication, physical therapy, and contrast water therapy have been used with varying success, evidence for standardized protocols remains limited.

In this prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, eligible patients with post-stroke CRPS type I were randomly assigned to receive either conventional rehabilitation alone or combined with contrast compression therapy. The intervention included 10 sessions of sequential thermal phases with pneumatic compression applied to the affected upper limb, delivered with a specialized device in addition to standard therapy.

The primary outcome measures were pain level and edema volume. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery, spasticity, clinical motor recovery, and neuropathic pain assessments. This study aims to contribute new evidence about whether contrast compression therapy offers additional benefits for managing post-stroke CRPS.\*

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as shoulder-hand syndrome, is observed in more than 50% of patients who have experienced a stroke. This condition is typically classified as Type I CRPS due to the absence of identifiable peripheral nerve injury. Although the precise underlying mechanism remains unclear, biomechanical factors that cause mechanical instability of the shoulder joint and repetitive microtrauma are considered major risk factors for its development.

Clinically, post-stroke CRPS is characterized by severe pain involving both the shoulder and wrist, accompanied by symptoms such as edema, warmth, redness, limited range of motion, tenderness in the metacarpophalangeal joints, and in later stages, joint contractures that may cause significant functional impairment. The chronic nature of CRPS can lead to substantial limitations in upper extremity use, prolonged hospital stays, dependency in daily living activities, and increased overall rehabilitation costs, thereby reducing patients' quality of life.

Although various conservative treatments-including pharmacological agents, physical therapy, contrast water therapy (CWT), and sympathetic nerve blocks-are frequently used, the effectiveness, long-term safety, and accessibility of standardized treatment protocols remain limited. Traditional contrast water therapy aims to stimulate circulation and modulate inflammation by alternating vasodilation and vasoconstriction phases; however, modern contrast compression therapy enhances this principle by combining sequential thermal stimulation with active pneumatic compression. This combination aims to improve not only peripheral circulation but also lymphatic drainage and tissue oxygenation.

Contrast compression therapy has gained popularity in recent years, especially in orthopedic and sports rehabilitation, due to its potential benefits in controlling pain and edema. Technological advancements have enabled these systems to deliver precisely regulated temperature, pressure, and treatment durations, allowing for a more controlled and personalized approach compared to conventional methods. Despite promising results in musculoskeletal applications, no clinical trial to date has specifically evaluated the effects of contrast compression therapy in the neurological rehabilitation context, particularly for patients with post-stroke CRPS.

Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate whether adding contrast compression therapy to conventional rehabilitation provides additional benefits for pain control, edema reduction, functional recovery, and motor improvement in patients diagnosed with post-stroke CRPS, aiming to address an important gap in the current literature.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Hemiplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Rehabilitation Group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Rehabilitation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A standard rehabilitation program including positioning, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Contrast Compression Therapy Group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Contrast Compression Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Contrast compression therapy using a Game Ready® MED4 ELITE device applied to the affected upper extremity with sequential hot and cold phases and pneumatic compression.

Conventional Rehabilitation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Same standard rehabilitation program as in the control group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional Rehabilitation

A standard rehabilitation program including positioning, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Contrast Compression Therapy

Contrast compression therapy using a Game Ready® MED4 ELITE device applied to the affected upper extremity with sequential hot and cold phases and pneumatic compression.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Rehabilitation

Same standard rehabilitation program as in the control group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 25 and 80 years
* First-ever stroke diagnosed within the previous 12 months
* Diagnosis of upper-extremity complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) according to the Budapest clinical criteria
* Subacute-stage CRPS affecting the upper limb
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 23
* Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Unstable medical condition
* Hemispatial neglect
* Sensory or motor aphasia
* Shoulder subluxation
* CRPS due to causes other than stroke
* Bilateral CRPS-I
* History of psychotic disorder
* Coexisting neuropathic pain syndromes (e.g., diabetic neuropathy)
* Presence of open wounds in the treatment area
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Meltem Gunes Akinci

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Meltem Gunes Akinci

Assistant Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara City Hospital

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E2-21-527

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.