Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) Impact on Clinical Outcome in firsT Line settIng Non- Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) According to Chemo- Immunotherapy reGimen

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-24

Study Completion Date

2031-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A multicenter, national pharmacological observational study that has as its overall goal to implement a set of validated and agreed upon European-wide questionnaires (PROMs - patient's reported outcomes) to assess patients' perceptions of aspects of their lives based on the treatment they are receiving.

Specifically, with the research we present here, we aim to obtain data on patients' health and condition, including quality of life, symptom status, physical function, mental health (anxiety and depression), sleep quality, and sexuality as useful indicators not only of patient well-being but also of the effectiveness of the treatment itself.

The study involves the following: patients will be asked to complete online questionnaires at the following timepoints: before the start of treatment, after 4 and 8 treatment cycles, and at disease progression.

Data will also be collected regarding the patient's oncological medical history, treatment performed, response to treatment at CT/PET reevaluations, any toxicities that arose during treatment.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Study of Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin/Cisplatin Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin/Cisplatin in Participants With Previously Untreated Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT04619797

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3

Quality of Life Comparison in Advanced Non-squamous Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT01303926

Non-squamous Nonsmall Cell Neoplasm of Lung

UNKNOWN PHASE3

A Study to Compare the Efficacy of Nivolumab and Relatlimab Plus Chemotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Stage IV/Recurrent Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Expression ≥ 1%

NCT06561386

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

RECRUITING PHASE3

Reduced-dose Carboplatin-doublet-chemotherapy + Cemiplimab vs Cemiplimab Monotherapy in Treatment Naive Older and Frail Patients With Metastatic NSCLC With PD-L1 <50%

NCT07020065

Metastatic NSCLC - Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2

A Study to Compare the Combination of BMS-986504 With Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in First-line Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Participants With Homozygous MTAP Deletion

NCT07063745

Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With MTAP Deletion

RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are tools to assess patients' views on aspects of their health and condition, including health-related quality of life, symptom status, physical function and mental health. In medical oncology, PROMs are emerging as useful indicators not only of patient well-being, but also of treatment efficacy. Measurement of quality of life (QoL) has an intrinsic role in the definition of treatment value and, in the absence of head-to-head comparisons showing differences in overall survival or other traditional endpoints, comparison in terms of QoL can usefully inform the choice among alternative treatment options. The recent availability of alternative strategies in advanced NSCLC, in particular different combination therapies in first line setting, requires models to support clinical decision in tailoring individual treatments. In this model, the integration of PROMs could be essential in promoting a patient-centered approach to cancer care.

EORTC QLQ-C-30, exploring general functioning, and EORTC LC-13, specific for lung cancer are the most used PROMs tools in thoracic oncology.

QoL is a complex and composite outcome, which includes different aspects of patients' well-being, such as anxiety, depression and emotional stress. The latter has been measured in patients with lung cancer using PHQ-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scales. Of note, a significant association with reduced response and worse survival upon immunotherapy was reported, suggesting an impact of emotional stress on patients' immune system and consequently on treatment outcomes.

Considering the broad effect of immunotherapy on the endocrine system and hormones' functions, it is likely that sexual health and sleep, other nuances of the QoL field, could be also affected by immunotherapy. So far, both sexual and sleep dysfunctions have been poorly explored in clinical trials. Furthermore, "time toxicity" defined as number of days with physical contact with healthcare system, could significantly affect patients' emotional distress sphere and has never been explored in NSCLC upon chemo-immunotherapy combinations.

Based on these assumptions, we believe that chemo-ICI (4 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy + anti- PD-1 followed by single agent chemo and immunotherapy maintenance) or double-ICI chemo (2 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy + anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, followed by maintenance with combo immunotherapy) regimens may have distinct effects on several QoL domains. This could be due to the intrinsic differences in the drugs used (i.e. addition of anti-CTLA-4 agents), treatment related toxicities and different tumor shrinkage activity.

The present study aims to compare QoL by validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C-30, EORTC LC13) in the two above mentioned cohorts of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, having an additional focus in sexual (EORTC QLQ-SH-22), emotional stress (PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale) and sleep disorders (PSQI) as previously reported. Time toxicity will be measured by analyzing the time patients spend in contact with healthcare system, such as visits and treatment. A defined cut off considers time toxicity severe when it exceeds 20% of the total care time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PROMs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort A: patient treated with chemo-ICI regimen as first line therapy

Cohort A: Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab (Keynote 189, EmpowerLung 3) for 4 cycles and then maintenance with Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab for 4 cycles and then maintenance with Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohort A: Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab (Keynote 189, EmpowerLung 3) for 4 cycles and then maintenance with Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Cohort B: patient treated with double ICI-chemo regimen as first line therapy

Cohort B:

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Nivolumab+Ipilimumab (CheckMate9LA) for 2 cycles and then maintenance with Nivolumab q21 and Ipilimumab q42 up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Nivolumab+Ipilimumab for 2 cycles and then maintenance with Nivolumab q21 and Ipilimumab q42 up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohort B:

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Nivolumab+Ipilimumab (CheckMate9LA) for 2 cycles and then maintenance with Nivolumab q21 and Ipilimumab q42 up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab for 4 cycles and then maintenance with Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Cohort A: Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab (Keynote 189, EmpowerLung 3) for 4 cycles and then maintenance with Pemetrexed+Pembrolizumab/Cemiplimab up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Nivolumab+Ipilimumab for 2 cycles and then maintenance with Nivolumab q21 and Ipilimumab q42 up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Cohort B:

Carboplatin/Cisplatin+Pemetrexed+Nivolumab+Ipilimumab (CheckMate9LA) for 2 cycles and then maintenance with Nivolumab q21 and Ipilimumab q42 up to 2 years or disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Diagnosis of Stage IV NSCLC with PD-L1 \<50%, without actionable genomic alterations
* Signed Informed Consent Form (ICF) to the study
* Patients eligible to receive first line treatment with combo chemo-immuno treatments as standard of care