Health Literacy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

NCT ID: NCT07045662

Last Updated: 2025-07-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-12

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this pragmatic trial was to analyze the effectiveness of health literacy in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus (DM2) on a protocol of care in Primary Health Care (PHC) units. The secondary objective was to analyze the effectiveness of knowledge about diabetes, self-efficacy, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in DM2 patients on a PHC protocol, as compared to the regular care provided by the municipality. Patients from four Family Health Units (FHU) were part of the study, two units as control group (CG) - Usual Assessment, two as intervention group (IG) - Multidisciplinary Assessment, with 44 subjects in each group. The IG mirrors the care protocol, which includes individual visits with physician, nurse, and nutritionist, in addition to systematized collective activities. The CG received the usual care. The research raises the hypothesis that subjects in the IG had a better understanding of aspects related to the disease and were more active in their own health care, as compared to patients who did not receive the intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research was structured together with professionals who work in the management of the Municipal Health Department of the municipality under study due to the intention of implementing multidisciplinary care for people with Diabetes Mellitus, considering health literacy (HL) and national guidelines as the basis for structuring the assessment protocol. The research is also part of the Municipal Government Program, enhancing the knowledge translation and social impact. Therefore, it was decided to carry out a pragmatic trial, characterized by evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in a real scenario (Zuidgeest et al., 2017). The development of pragmatic trials contribute to the identification of scientific evidence that reduces gaps in primary health care, improving the Brazilian public health system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Assessment

The participants in the usual assessment were provided regular care, including at least one medical appointment every six months with prescription review.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Multidisciplinary Assessment

The participants in the multidisciplinary assessment were followed by teams from the study target-units, by individual and collective interviews, which mirror the care protocol. The frequency of individual visits was at least every six months by a nurse, a physician, and a nutritionist. Regarding the collective activities, the educational groups met for approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes on monthly basis over a period of six months. Considering that there were two FHU in the IG, each team held one activity per month. For the development of the collective activities, methods recognized for intensifying integration and participation, such as using simple language and confirming the participants' understanding of the information covered in the group were recommended.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multidisciplinary Assessment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The participants in the multidisciplinary assessment were followed by multidisciplinary teams from the study target-units, by individual and collective interviews, which mirror the care protocol. The frequency of individual visits was at least every six months by a nurse, a physician, and a nutritionist.

Regarding the collective activities, the educational groups met for approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes on monthly basis over a period of six months. Considering that there were two FHU in the IG, each team held one activity per month.

For the development of the collective activities, methods recognized for intensifying integration and participation, such as using simple language and confirming the participants' understanding of the information covered in the group were recommended.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multidisciplinary Assessment

The participants in the multidisciplinary assessment were followed by multidisciplinary teams from the study target-units, by individual and collective interviews, which mirror the care protocol. The frequency of individual visits was at least every six months by a nurse, a physician, and a nutritionist.

Regarding the collective activities, the educational groups met for approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes on monthly basis over a period of six months. Considering that there were two FHU in the IG, each team held one activity per month.

For the development of the collective activities, methods recognized for intensifying integration and participation, such as using simple language and confirming the participants' understanding of the information covered in the group were recommended.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes mellitus Disease
* Must be able to read and speak Portuguese
* Being followed exclusively at the primary health care unit for the disease at the beginning of the study
* Not participating in other studies involving diabetes mellitus

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Physical health problems that prevent the patient from coming to the unit
* Hearing impairment that compromises communication
* Cognitive problems according to the MMSE cutoff points
* History of serious psychiatric disorder recorded in the medical record
* Patients not located after three attempts of home visits on different days and times
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ernanda Mezaroba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ernanda Mezaroba

PhD student

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Idiane Rosset, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 16;13:658. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-658.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23855504 (View on PubMed)

Dunn SM, Bryson JM, Hoskins PL, Alford JB, Handelsman DJ, Turtle JR. Development of the diabetes knowledge (DKN) scales: forms DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC. Diabetes Care. 1984 Jan-Feb;7(1):36-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.1.36.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6705664 (View on PubMed)

Bijl JV, Poelgeest-Eeltink AV, Shortridge-Baggett L. The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs. 1999 Aug;30(2):352-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01077.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10457237 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAAE 79433824.3.0000.5347

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.