Comparing 7 mm and 5 mm Implants Placed Immediately After Molar Extraction
NCT ID: NCT07041294
Last Updated: 2025-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-01
2029-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Monolithic Zirconia Posterior Single Crowns: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06865209
Single Implant Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Implants in Molar Sites
NCT07073196
Two-piece Zirconia Implants With Two Various Platforms
NCT06012071
Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed in Preserved and Non-preserved Post-extraction Ridges
NCT03715439
Differences Between Two Type Implants in Post-extraction Alveolus
NCT05665231
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A total of 70 patients requiring molar tooth extraction and immediate implant placement will be enrolled across 7 centers. Each participant will receive either a 5 mm or a 7 mm diameter implant, allocated randomly. Standardised surgical and prosthetic protocols will be followed.
Follow-up visits will assess implant stability, radiographic bone changes, and clinical outcomes over time. Patient-reported outcomes and complications will also be recorded to compare the two groups. Results will be reported at 1 and 5 years after loading.
This study may help clinicians make evidence-based decisions when choosing the diameter of implants in molar regions, particularly in immediate post-extraction situations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
7 mm Diameter Implant
Participants receive a 7 mm diameter implant placed immediately after molar extraction.
7 mm Diameter Dental Implant
To evaluate immediate post-extraction implants with different diameters (7 vs. 5 mm)
5 mm Diameter Implant
Participants receive a 5 mm diameter implant placed immediately after molar extraction.
5 mm Diameter Dental Implant
To evaluate immediate post-extraction implants with different diameters (5 vs. 7 mm)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
7 mm Diameter Dental Implant
To evaluate immediate post-extraction implants with different diameters (7 vs. 5 mm)
5 mm Diameter Dental Implant
To evaluate immediate post-extraction implants with different diameters (5 vs. 7 mm)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to sign an informed consent form
* requiring at least one immediate post-extractive implant in first and/or second molar sites
* sufficient bone to allow placement of an immediate implant at least 7 mm in length and 7 mm in diameter
Exclusion Criteria
* immunosuppressed or immunocompromised
* irradiation in the head or neck area
* uncontrolled diabetes
* pregnancy or lactation
* untreated periodontitis
* poor oral hygiene and motivation
* addiction to alcohol or drugs
* psychiatric disorders
* unrealistic expectations
* acute infection (abscess) in the site intended for implant placement
* necessity to lift the maxillary sinus epithelium
* unable to commit to 5-year follow-up post-loading
* under treatment or had previous treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates
* lack of bony wall completely surrounding the future implant
* participation in other studies interfering with present protocol.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marco Esposito
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marco Esposito
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Esposito, Dentistry
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nobel dental clinic
Tirana, , Albania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NR430PROT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.