Intestinal Hyperechogenicity Confirmed by Evaluation of Gray Spectra
NCT ID: NCT07039721
Last Updated: 2025-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-10-01
2026-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
. However, many of the patients referred after a screening examination for this reason actually have their diagnosis invalidated during the specialist consultation. These "false alarms" lead to an overload of specialist consultations, and are a source of concern for couples.
The diagnosis of intestinal hyperechogenicity is difficult because it is based on the sonographer's subjective impression, with a 3-grade gradation according to the echogenicity of the intestine in relation to the bone (Slotnick and Abuhamad. 1996). According to this method, the evaluation is carried out by progressively decreasing the gain applied to the image: if the hyperechoic bowel disappears before the iliac bone, it's a grade 1; if the bowel and iliac bone disappear at the same time, it's a grade 2; and finally if the bowel is still visible on the image while the iliac bone has disappeared, it's a grade 3.
In addition to gain, which, if too high, tends to overestimate the diagnosis of hyperechoic bowel, other ultrasound parameters can vary the subjective impression of bowel echogenicity, such as the use of high-frequency probes or the application of harmonics, which also lead to overdiagnosis (Lee and Cho. 2003).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Performance of Antenatal Ultrasound for High-Risk Intestinal Malrotation
NCT03968107
Neonatal Outcome of Children With Antenatal Colic Hyperechogenicity
NCT04983069
Antenatal Detection by Array CGH Genomic Rearrangements Unbalanced Front Uninsulated Thick Neck or a Combination of Two Signs of Ultrasound Calling Normal Karyotype
NCT03239002
Doppler at the Diagnosis in Predicting Perinatal Outcomes in Early and Late-onset Fetal Growth Restriction
NCT05696223
Fetal Growth Evaluation by Three-Dimensional Ultrasound
NCT00340171
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Evaluation of echogenicity
Patients ongoing a routine 2nd or 3rd trimester ultrasound will have an extra 5 minutes of ultrasound with a specifc intestinal setting
Evaluation of echogenicity
Patients ongoing a routine 2nd or 3rd trimester ultrasound will have an extra 5 minutes of ultrasound with a specific intestinal setting
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evaluation of echogenicity
Patients ongoing a routine 2nd or 3rd trimester ultrasound will have an extra 5 minutes of ultrasound with a specific intestinal setting
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy,
* singletons or twins, diamniotics, adults,
* undergoing screening or diagnostic ultrasound at obstetric and gynecology department,
* on the Samsung Hera W10 ultrasound machine during the study
* Patient able to understand the ins and outs of the study
* Patient has been informed of the study and has expressed no objection to participating in it.
Exclusion Criteria
* Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
* Persons under psychiatric care
* Persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research
* Adults under legal protection
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, Rhone, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
69HCL25_0422
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.