3D Decision Support Tool for Brain Tumour Surgery Development and Validation: Observational Study

NCT ID: NCT07036783

Last Updated: 2025-06-25

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Total Enrollment: 320 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2025-07-01
• Study Completion Date: 2027-04-30

Brief Summary

This observational study (STRATUM-OS) aims to collect the necessary data from a cohort of patients with planned surgery for suspected intra-axial malignant brain tumours (both primary and secondary) following the standard surgical procedure established in current clinical protocols. These data will serve two primary purposes:

i) To gather multimodal data (pre, intra and postoperative) essential for the development and technical validation of a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics integrating augmented reality and multimodal data processing powered by artificial intelligence algorithms (called STRATUM tool);

ii) To collect outcome measures that will facilitate a subsequent comparative study (a non-randomized controlled clinical trial, called STRATUM-NRCCT) assessing the standard procedure alone versus the standard procedure augmented with the STRATUM tool. Patients from STRATUM-OS will act as a historical control group in the subsequent historically controlled clinical trial (STRATUM-NRCCT), which will be performed once STRATUM-OS has been completed.

In STRATUM-OS patients will receive standard care as per established clinical protocols, with no modification to their treatment. However, patients will be asked to grant access to their clinical information, complete questionnaires, and provide relevant pre, intra and postoperative information related to the surgical intervention. Data will be gathered from multiple sources, such as the Electronic Health Records (EHR), patient completed questionnaires, interviews, and reports from healthcare professionals involved in the surgical procedure. Additionally, intraoperative data will be collected from the different devices in the operating room.

Detailed Description

CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN STRATUM PROJECT

Integrated digital diagnostics can support complex surgeries in many anatomies where brain tumour surgery is one of the most complex cases. Neurosurgeons face several challenges during brain tumour surgeries, such as critical tissue and brain tumour margins differentiation or the interpretation of large amount of data available provided by several independent devices.

To address these challenges, STRATUM aims to develop a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics integrating augmented reality and multimodal data processing powered by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. This tool will function as a point-of-care computing system and will be developed using a co-creation methodology that actively involves end-users and other stakeholders. The STRATUM tool will include hyperspectral (HS) imaging (HSI) as an emerging imaging modality in the medical field to enhance intraoperative guidance and diagnosis during the neurosurgical procedures.9 Previous works from several members of the STRATUM consortium in different research projects (HELICoiD, ITHaCA, and NEMESIS-3D-CM) have demonstrated, as a proof-of-concept, that this technology is suitable for the intraoperative identification and delineation of brain tumours in real-time. Additionally, the tool is expected to provide a real-time deformation of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the exposed brain surface for brain-shift compensation during surgery. This will be performed by using advanced mathematical models in combination with the intraoperative multimodal data (HSI, depth information and standard surgical microscope imaging) captured by the STRATUM tool.

The system will be developed and clinically evaluated in three main stages. In Stage 1, a customized multimodal data acquisition system was developed to be used in the observational study of Stage 2 (STRATUM-OS), which will focused on the multimodal data imaging collection to support the development and technical validation of the STRATUM tool. In Stage 3 the tool will undergo clinical validation through a subsequent, non-randomized, historically controlled, clinical trial (STRATUM-NRCCT). The historic control in STRATUM-NRCCT will be the subjects recruited in STRATUM-OS.

Overall, the STRATUM project aims to:

i) optimize the integration and processing of existing and emerging data sources, facilitating timely, efficient and accurate surgical decision-making; ii) maximize tumour resection while minimizing the risk of neurological deficits; iii) reduce anaesthesia duration and related risks; iv) decrease waste associated with repeated pathology analysis; and v) optimize healthcare resource utilization.

STRATUM OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

STRATUM-OS is an international multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study, with a follow-up duration of 6 months, in which the data generated from brain tumour surgeries, including a wide range of intra-axial tumour types, will be collected to meet the objectives of the study. In STRATUM-OS patients will receive standard care as per established clinical protocols, with no modification to their treatment. However, patients will be asked to grant access to their clinical information, complete questionnaires, and provide relevant pre, intra and postoperative information related to the surgical intervention. STRATUM-OS is planned for a duration of 28 months divided in: i) a pre-recruitment period of 2 months for the installation of and surgeon training on the acquisition system, ii) a recruitment period of 20 months, and iii) follow-up period of 6 months, including one month for the integration and technical validation of the fully-working STRATUM tool. We anticipate that 320 consecutive patients can be recruited during this study in the 3 clinical sites. The protocol has been drafted in accordance with the Standardised Protocol Items: Recommendations for Observational Studies (SPIROS) statement

The general objective of STRATUM-OS is to collect the necessary data from a cohort of patients affected by intra-axial brain tumours with the standard surgical procedure established in current clinical protocols. STRATUM-OS will pursue the following main objectives:

1. To collect pre-stored and in-situ multimodal data for the development of an intraoperative 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics in real-time leveraging AI-based multimodal data processing (STRATUM tool).

2. To technically validate the STRATUM tool, aiming for (1) the intraoperative distinction between tumour and non-tumour areas in the exposed brain surface and (2) the identification of contrast-enhancing tumour (CET) or non-contrast-enhancing tumour (nCET/FLAIR-positive) regions in MRI, through AI-driven processing.

3. To compile a historical control group dataset including patient clinical data, health outcomes, surgical and tumour characteristics, and hospital resource utilization and costs. This dataset will be used in the subsequent non-randomized controlled clinical trial (STRATUM-NRCCT), to assess the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the STRATUM tool in brain tumours surgery.

SETTING AND RECRUITMENT

Adult participants (≥ 18 years) with an intra-axial brain tumour will be eligible for inclusion. Recruitment will follow a consecutive enrolment process, selecting subjects who meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria at the 3 participating clinical institutions: Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain), Karolinska University Hospital (Solna, Sweden) and Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain). Patients will be invited to participate and will be required to sign a written, informed consent form prior to inclusion in the study. They will continue to receive care at their originally assigned medical centre, with no patient transfers between institutions. Members of the research team at each hospital site will introduce the study to subjects who will receive written information describing the study. Researchers will discuss the study details with participants ensuring they have a thorough understanding before making a decision. Participants will have the opportunity to engage in an informed discussion with their physician before consenting. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or, when applicable, from their designed tutor or legal representatives.

DATA COLLECTION

The data collection procedure will include data extracted from the EHR of the patient, self-reported questionnaires, information collected from the different professionals involved in the neurosurgical workflow, recorded through an electronic Case Report Form (eCRF), and data collected intraoperatively using the STRATUM acquisition system along with detailed information about the surgery (using the eCRF). The STRATUM eCRF is built on the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) platform and securely stored in an anonymized and standardized format within a secure repository at the Institute for Applied Microelectronics (IUMA) of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC). All patient data will be assigned by a unique coded ID [identification] number linked to the subject to ensure pseudo-anonymization. Only the local clinical team will be aware of each participant's identity. A locally and securely managed document will link each study ID with the corresponding participant. The data collection procedure will be divided into three main phases.

Preoperative phase:

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and after giving consent to participate in the study will be identified by the Data Collector (DC) at each clinical site. The DC will extract preliminary information from the EHR and confirm the eligibility with the principal investigator at the site before surgery. Preoperative data, including tabular patient information and various preoperative imaging modalities, will be collected, anonymized and transcribed by the DC from several sources (EHR, self-reported questionnaires and interviews/questionnaires/reports from healthcare professionals involved in the neurosurgical workflows). These data will be entered into the STRATUM eCRF.

Intraoperative phase:

During surgery, the operating surgeon will be assisted by the DC in carrying out the following tasks:

• Collection of intraoperative data: The STRATUM acquisition system will be used to capture in-situ HS and standard RGB (Red-Green-Blue) images, depth data, and other relevant intraoperative information of the exposed brain surface.
• Tumour identification and resection: The operating surgeon will identify and resect suspicious tumour tissue based on neuronavigation guidance and their surgical judgement according to the standard procedure. At least one tissue sample should be resected from the centre of the tumour site. If possible, the operating surgeon will decide to excise and separately store one to seven additional suspicious tissue samples for definitive pathological diagnosis as part of their routine clinical practice, identifying them within both the STRATUM and the neuronavigation systems for subsequent correlation analysis. Resected tissue samples will be processed according to local protocols at each clinical site. A specific coding system linking the project, clinical site, patient and tissue sample will be used to enter the data in the eCRF. These suspected tumour samples will subsequently undergo histological analysis. Additional samples will be taken from surgical margins where tumour presence is suspected, aligning with the standard surgical procedure. Therefore, no extra sampling of tissue not suspected to be tumorous will be performed.
• Neuronavigation procedure documentation: The entire neuronavigation process will be recorded, including multiple positioning points of the neuronavigator marker in relation to the navigable MRI at key stages of the surgical procedure. At least, the neuronavigator marker should be documented within the neuronavigation system (and captured by the STRATUM acquisition system) at the exact tumour site location where the tissue sample will be resected for pathological diagnosis. At least, three HS images will be captured during surgery: 1) A full capture of the exposed brain surface following craniotomy and durotomy; 2) A capture taken at an intermediate stage of the surgery where the tumour tissue is clearly exposed; 3) A final capture after completing the tumour resection. Prior to each HS image, the surgeon will ensure that the exposed area is carefully cleaned to prevent artifacts in the imaging data. When feasible, additional images corresponding to point 2) will be captured throughout the surgery to obtain the clearest possible representation of the brain tumour area.
• Identification and recording of non-tumour brain tissue data: At least one highly reliable non-tumour brain tissue area will also be identified and documented based on neuronavigation and the operating surgeon's judgement. These positions should be recorded within both the neuronavigation system and the STRATUM acquisition system for further correlation analysis, but no tissue sample will be resected. The same coding protocol will be used in the eCRF to label the captured images of non-tumour brain tissue.
• Intraoperative data storage: Immediately after surgery, the DC will download the captured data from the STRATUM acquisition system and the neuronavigator and store them in an external, encrypted, hard drive for subsequent pseudo-anonymization. Once pseudo-anonymized, all multimodal data (HS and RGB images, depth data, different MRI modalities, etc.) will be uploaded to the secure, dedicated STRATUM server at IUMA-ULPGC.

Postoperative phase:

Post-operative data will be collected by the DC from the EHR at one, three, and six months after surgery. The same anonymization protocol will be applied, ensuring that all multimodal data is securely stored on the STRATUM server, while tabular data is entered into the STRATUM eCRF.

Once data collection is completed for each patient, the Study Monitor, who is independent of the research team, will review the database for errors and missing data, ensuring data quality. If necessary, the Study Monitor will collaborate with the site DC to resolve errors or discrepancies between the eCRF and the primary source data (e.g., EHR and questionnaires) and make direct revisions in the eCRF. In case of a participant ceases participation in the study or is lost to follow-up, the anonymized data generated until that moment will be employed, if possible, for the technical validation, but the observation will be excluded from the analyses where the missing data is necessary to compute the outcomes in the subsequent clinical trial.

STUDY MEASURE CATEGORIES

The collected measures will span from patient enrolment to the end of a 6-month follow-up period after surgery and will be categorized in the following main domains:

• Patient characteristics: Tabular data from the patient, such as age, year of birth, weight, sex, etc.
• Patient´s symptoms: Tabular data from the patient symptoms related to neurological consequences of the tumour.
• PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcome Measures): Scores obtained from the KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) scale, the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status scale, the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument, the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ- BN20 brain tumour module and the EORTC QLQ Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C).
• Vasari guide variables: The variables related to the radiological characteristics of the brain tumours follow the VASARI (Visually AcceSAble Rembrandt Images) MRI visual feature guide. Such variables will be measured using the minimum requirements to allow lesion volumetry and diagnosis using a 1.5 T MRI.
• Surgery details: These variables represent the information related to the personnel, tools, materials involved in the surgery, as well as the duration of the different parts and tasks of the surgery. These variables will help to quantify the cost and efficiency of the surgery.
• Intraoperative pathology: Variables related to the intraoperative tissue diagnosis provided after analysing frozen section samples for rapid diagnosis during surgery according to the local routine practices at each site. In case more than one intraoperative tissue analysis is performed, these data will be collected for each sample independently.
• Definitive pathology: Variables related to the definitive tissue diagnosis provided by histopathology. The CAP (College of American Pathologists) protocol for the examination of tumours of the brain and spinal cord (version 1.0.0.0, September 2022) will be followed to diagnose intra-axial primary brain tumours. Molecular information will be provided according to the 5th edition of the WHO (World Health Organization) Classification of Tumours of the CNS (Central Nervous System), where it is specified that molecular information should be integrated into many of the tumour types, such as diffuse gliomas and embryonal tumours.
• Definitive pathology (STRATUM-related samples): Variables related to the definitive tissue diagnosis provided by histopathology of the additional resected suspected tumour samples for STRATUM technical validation. This only includes the specimen size and the tissue type (non-tumour or tumour). The same standard procedures as presented before will be applied to this histopathological analysis.
• Exitus: Variables related to the patient's death in case it occurs.
• Postoperative MRI outcomes: Variables related to the extent of resection and volume of residual tumour on postoperative 48/72 h MRI using 1.5T MRI.
• Complications: Set of variables representing the possible postoperative complications related to brain tumour surgery, including the type of complication, its treatment, and the diagnostic tests performed, if necessary.
• Medication: Set of variables representing the group type of the medication (painkillers, steroids, antiseizures, other) administered to the patient after brain surgery and related to it.
• Emergency and hospital readmissions: Variables representing the hospital admission and discharge dates of the patient, including the visits to emergency room, due to causes related to brain tumour surgery, but different to the hospital stay due to the surgical operation.
• Follow-up MRI: Variables indicating the date of the follow-up MRI, the reason and whether or not progression has occurred.
• Treatments: This group of variables represents the class of postoperative treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) applied to the patient related to the brain surgery, including the types and subtypes of treatment, the number of cycles or sessions and the dose (in case of chemotherapy).
• Hospital stay: Dates of admission and discharge measured from the moment the patient enters (prior surgery) and leaves (after surgery) the hospital, including those related to the time spent at neurosurgical care ward.
• Follow-up visits to professionals: Variables representing the number of follow-up visits to different healthcare professionals in relation to the brain tumour surgery, including the professional type and the date of the visit.
• Follow-up tests: Variables representing the number of follow-up tests performed to the patient in relation to the management of the brain tumour, including the type of test and date performed.

SAMPLE SIZE

In total, it is estimated that 26 patients will undergo brain surgery per month across the three clinical sites. Of these, approximately 70% of patients (~18 patients/month) are expected to meet the inclusion criteria, satisfy none of the exclusion criteria, and provide the informed consent for study participation. A 90% success rate in obtaining usable samples is anticipated (~16 patients/month). Consequently, STRATUM-OS is expected to collect data from 320 consecutive patients over 20 months of recruitment, followed by a 6-month follow-up period (total duration: 28 months). Given an average of 4.5 samples per patient (accounting for potential sample loss during pathological analysis), a total of approximately 1,440 tissue samples are expected to be collected.

These estimations have been obtained based on previous experiences from the project partners. Particularly, from the HELICoiD and ITHaCA projects in which the same HS acquisition system was employed, a total of 85 HS images were obtained from 41 different subjects captured in three data acquisition campaigns at the Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, covering a 24-months period in total. From this dataset, 28% of HS images were excluded (17% of subjects), resulting in 61 HS images from 34 eligible subjects. Additionally, the study conducted at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre within the NEMESIS-3D-CM project was able to obtain a multimodal dataset composed by HS images from 193 different subjects, also in a 24-months period.

Although patient-level data are important for clinical context and for using them as historical controls in the subsequent STRATUM-NRCCT study, in this study the primary unit of analysis for the main outcome measure is the individual tissue sample, which will be histologically classified as "tumour" or "non-tumour" and serve as the reference standard for technical validation. Therefore, the effective sample size for the statistical analysis is determined by the number of validated tissue samples. This volume of data is expected to provide sufficient statistical power to estimate key diagnostic performance metrics of the STRATUM Tool-such as sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values-with acceptable precision.

A preliminary evaluation of inclusion rates will be conducted after the first 3 months of recruitment, to identify potential barriers to enrolment. If necessary, corrective measures will be implemented to ensure that the study reaches its target sample size.

DATA PARTITION FOR TECHNICAL VALIDATION

In AI-based applications, data partitioning is the process of dividing a dataset into several subsets (e.g., training, validation and test sets). This process is crucial to evaluate and validate the performance of developed AI models, ensuring that models are validated and tested using unseen data for model training. This is highly important especially in medical applications, where data from different subjects must be in independent sets. This allows a more accurate assessment of the model performance, avoiding overfitting and obtaining more generalized models for unseen data/subjects.

In this study, we plan to utilize the initial 70% of recruited patients to train the AI algorithm (n=224 patients). The subsequent 10% will be used for cross-validation (n=32), and the final 20% will serve to test the model (n=64). While data partitioning is performed at the patient level to avoid information leakage, the actual analysis will be conducted at the tissue sample level, using labels validated by histopathology to assess diagnostic performance at the tissue sample level.

STATISTICAL METHODS

To ensure a robust and unbiased evaluation of the STRATUM Tool, the dataset will be partitioned at the patient level into three non-overlapping subsets: 70% for model training, 10% for internal validation, and 20% for final testing. This partitioning strategy is intended to prevent data leakage across subsets, ensuring that all tissue samples from the same patient are assigned to the same group. Observations from participants with missing data may be excluded from analyses.

The training set will be used to build the AI model by learning patterns from intraoperative imaging data paired with corresponding histopathological or radiological labels. The validation set will be used during model development to fine-tune hyperparameters and optimize training procedures (e.g., early stopping, learning rate adjustments, regularization). No metrics will be formally reported from the validation set.

The test set will be completely isolated during model development and used exclusively to compute final performance metrics. These will include accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, ROC curve analysis, the Jaccard Index, and the Dice-Sørensen coefficient, as appropriate to the outcome type (classification or segmentation). Diagnostic performance will be assessed for two main tasks: (1) the distinction between tumour and non-tumour tissue samples, using definitive histopathological analysis as the reference standard; and (2) the identification of CET and nCET (FLAIR-positive) regions in MRI, using histopathological and radiological reports as the reference.

Subgroup analyses will be performed for the most common histological tumour types, defined as those with at least 25 patients included in the test set. All subgroup evaluations will be conducted exclusively within the test set to ensure unbiased estimation. Due to the subsample nature of the investigation, performance estimates may have wide confidence intervals, particularly for less frequent tumour subtypes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will adhere to the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects established in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. According to our previous experience, the use of HSI has not demonstrated any safety or tolerability concerns in surgical procedures.

Multimodal data will be captured by expert neurosurgeons using the STRATUM acquisition system designed, produced, and installed at each clinical site (at the time of surgery, no real-time results on tissue classification will be displayed to physicians, except for the standard frozen section histopathological diagnostic information they usually receive). The STRATUM acquisition system will not alter the surgical procedure, apart for the data collection process (estimated to be ~10 min during the entire surgery with no expected negative effects for the patient). Captured data will not influence or modify the neurosurgical plan. As part of the standard procedure, tumour tissue samples and adjacent tissue samples (suspected to be tumour) will be collected for pathological analysis. These samples will serve as golden standard for the algorithm development. This sample collection will not interfere with the intervention, histopathological analysis, or the intraoperative decision-making. Pathologists will have no access to the STRATUM tool results prior to their independent analysis, even during validation and testing phases after initial training.

Patient confidentiality and data security will be managed in compliance with General Data Protection Regulations and relevant national and European legislations as per local and national ethical approvals. All study-related information will be securely stored at the clinical sites. All local databases will be protected by password restricted access systems. Forms, lists, logbooks, appointment books, and any other listings that link participant ID numbers to other identifying information will be stored in a separated, locked restricted-access areas. Only authorized personnel, including researchers involved in the STRATUM project, the sponsor or designated representatives, the Ethics Committee, and relevant health authorities will have access to this data.

All data and biological samples collected during STRATUM-OS will be used exclusively for the development and technical validation of the STRATUM tool, as well as for the creation of a historical control group for the subsequent non-randomized controlled clinical trial (STRATUM-NRCCT). This purpose is explicitly stated among the primary objectives of the present protocol. Therefore, no additional informed consent will be required for this use, as participants will be fully informed and provide consent to both components-technical validation and historical control generation-at the time of inclusion. Any future use of data or samples beyond the scope of this protocol will require prior approval from the relevant Ethics Committees and, where applicable, new participant consent. Participants will have the right to access, rectify, delete, limit the processing, portability and opposition of their data by contacting the principal investigator of the project in each clinical site.

The results of this study will be published in open access journals, regardless of whether the findings are positive or negative. The study results will be shared with the participating physicians, referring clinicians, patients, and the broader medical and scientific community. Data (properly anonymized) will be stored in the secure STRATUM repository at the project coordination institution and, upon project completion, will be archived in trusted repositories, having their respective digital object identifiers (DOIs).

Conditions

Brain (Nervous System) Cancers; Brain Tumor, Primary

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_ONLY
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Control

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patients (≥18 y/o).
• Patients with planned surgery for suspected intraaxial malignant brain tumours (both primary and secondary) at any of the participating clinical institutions.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to deliver informed consent (unless provided by the tutor).
• Participants in this study who have already undergone brain surgery during STRATUM-OS and need a revision surgery.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult patients (≥18 y/o).
• Patients with planned surgery for suspected intraaxial malignant brain tumours (both primary and secondary) at any of the participating clinical institutions.

Exclusion Criteria

• Inability to deliver informed consent (unless provided by the tutor).
• Participants in this study who have already undergone brain surgery during STRATUM-OS and need a revision surgery.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Karolinska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital 12 de Octubre

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Juan F. Piñeiro-Marti, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Alfonso Lagares, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Dept. of Surgery, Medicine Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias (imas12), Madrid, Spain

Gustav Burström, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Himar Fabelo, MsC, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Central Contacts

Himar Fabelo, PhD

Role: CONTACT

hafabelo@fciisc.es

+34 928457211

References

Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins C, Ng HK, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G, Soffietti R, von Deimling A, Ellison DW. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 34185076 (View on PubMed)

Sanvito F, Kaufmann TJ, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Ellingson BM. Standardized brain tumor imaging protocols for clinical trials: current recommendations and tips for integration. Front Radiol. 2023 Dec 13;3:1267615. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1267615. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 38152383 (View on PubMed)

Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Barboriak DP, Huang RH, Wick W, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Chung C, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Al Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR, Rosen BR, Ellingson BM, Schmainda KM; Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition Imaging Standardization Steering Committee. Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):1262-1275. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 32516388 (View on PubMed)

Leon R, Fabelo H, Ortega S, Cruz-Guerrero IA, Campos-Delgado DU, Szolna A, Pineiro JF, Espino C, O'Shanahan AJ, Hernandez M, Carrera D, Bisshopp S, Sosa C, Balea-Fernandez FJ, Morera J, Clavo B, Callico GM. Hyperspectral imaging benchmark based on machine learning for intraoperative brain tumour detection. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Nov 14;7(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00475-9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 37964078 (View on PubMed)

Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS, Sjavik K, Unsgard G, Torp SH, Aaberg K, Berg T, Dai HY, Johnsen K, Kloster R, Solheim O. Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1942-1948. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx230.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28475680 (View on PubMed)

Gerard IJ, Kersten-Oertel M, Petrecca K, Sirhan D, Hall JA, Collins DL. Brain shift in neuronavigation of brain tumors: A review. Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:403-420. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27585837 (View on PubMed)

GBD 2016 Brain and Other CNS Cancer Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other CNS cancer, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):376-393. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30468-X. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30797715 (View on PubMed)

Manni F, van der Sommen F, Fabelo H, Zinger S, Shan C, Edstrom E, Elmi-Terander A, Ortega S, Marrero Callico G, de With PHN. Hyperspectral Imaging for Glioblastoma Surgery: Improving Tumor Identification Using a Deep Spectral-Spatial Approach. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 5;20(23):6955. doi: 10.3390/s20236955.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 33291409 (View on PubMed)

Fabelo H, Ortega S, Ravi D, Kiran BR, Sosa C, Bulters D, Callico GM, Bulstrode H, Szolna A, Pineiro JF, Kabwama S, Madronal D, Lazcano R, J-O'Shanahan A, Bisshopp S, Hernandez M, Baez A, Yang GZ, Stanciulescu B, Salvador R, Juarez E, Sarmiento R. Spatio-spectral classification of hyperspectral images for brain cancer detection during surgical operations. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0193721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193721. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29554126 (View on PubMed)

Fabelo H, Ortega S, Lazcano R, Madronal D, M Callico G, Juarez E, Salvador R, Bulters D, Bulstrode H, Szolna A, Pineiro JF, Sosa C, J O'Shanahan A, Bisshopp S, Hernandez M, Morera J, Ravi D, Kiran BR, Vega A, Baez-Quevedo A, Yang GZ, Stanciulescu B, Sarmiento R. An Intraoperative Visualization System Using Hyperspectral Imaging to Aid in Brain Tumor Delineation. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Feb 1;18(2):430. doi: 10.3390/s18020430.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29389893 (View on PubMed)

Halicek M, Fabelo H, Ortega S, Callico GM, Fei B. In-Vivo and Ex-Vivo Tissue Analysis through Hyperspectral Imaging Techniques: Revealing the Invisible Features of Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019 May 30;11(6):756. doi: 10.3390/cancers11060756.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31151223 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

https://www.stratum-project.eu/

STRATUM Project: 3D Decision Support Tool for Brain Tumor Surgery (101137416)

Other Identifiers

101137416

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STRATUM-OS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id