Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
134 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-07-01
2032-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Promotion of Thickened Feeds to Manage Newborns With Feeding Difficulties
NCT00859092
Retrospective Review of Amino Acid Formula Use at a Children's Center
NCT03497091
SAFEstart Feeding Intolerance Study Phase II
NCT00331201
Effect OF Lactase Enzyme Supplements ON Intolerance IN Preterm Neonates
NCT07088302
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of a New Formula on the Growth, Safety and Tolerance of Infants With Growth Failure
NCT03563391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The overarching aim is to implement the Parent-Implemented Oral Nutrition, Eating- and Esophageal rhythms Reintegration (PIONEER) program initiatives to examine the Jadcherla hypothesis. The Jadcherla Hypothesis states that engaging the enteric and central nervous system reflexes early, persistently, and safely in tube-fed infants will result in consistent programmed activation of the deglutition process, swallowing-airway interactions, peristaltic reflexes, and autonomic regulation that will advance neuroplasticity, learning and memory.
The central hypothesis is that the activatable aerodigestive reflex mechanisms are vital in managing oral eating skills, and the independent feeding outcomes (i.e., without a G-tube) depend on intervention strategies.
The rationale is that identifying successful outcomes that are scientifically driven will lay the foundation for scalable protocols. In this RCT, the effect of Parent Implemented Oral Nutrition, Eating, Esophageal reflexes Reintegration (PIONEER©) protocol on clinical and mechanistic outcomes will be examined. Therefore, the impact of the PIONEER© protocol will be tested against the standard of care by completing two specific aims: 1) Compare the efficacy of the randomized intervention by examining the hypothesis that the PIONEER© approach is more effective at achieving the primary outcome of successful oral feeding without requiring a G-tube at NICU discharge. 2) Determine and compare the longitudinal pathophysiological mechanisms in assessing the superiority in achieving the primary outcome by testing the hypothesis that infants who follow the PIONEER© protocol will have more effective mechanisms for restoring and adapting their aerodigestive reflexes.
High-resolution manometry will be used to identify differences between the two study arms concerning the sensory-motor characteristics of aerodigestive reflexes.Completion of the proposed aims will provide opportunities for scalable and generalizable approaches to improve feeding safety and efficiency, while helping infants achieve essential developmental milestones and reducing the socioeconomic burden.
RELEVANCE: This proposal addresses a critical gap for infants who require chronic tube feeding. Completing the proposed aims will result in paradigm shifting methods to optimize oral intake while decreasing the duration of chronic NG tube feeding or preventing g-tube feeding. New evidence-based standardized guidelines will emerge from this study that have the potential for scalability, improving infant feeding-intake methods, growth, and maturation, thereby, alleviating chronic eating difficulties, delayed neurodevelopmental consequences, and public health burden.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group: PIONEER Protocol
PIONEER© Protocol
* Oral nutritive stimulus with every feed (minimum 5mL)
* Esophageal stimulation with up to 15 stimulations given at least 5 times per week with stimulation catheter
* High resolution esophageal manometry as much as weekly if feasible throughout protocol
* Parent biofeedback (during manometry studies) and education on at least a weekly basis with focus on their participation in oral feeding
PIONEER Protocol
* Oral nutritive stimulus with every feed (minimum 5mL)
* Esophageal stimulation with up to 15 stimulations given at least 5 times per week with stimulation catheter
* High resolution esophageal manometry as much as weekly if feasible throughout protocol
* Parent biofeedback (during manometry studies) and education on at least a weekly basis with focus on their participation in oral feeding
Control Group: Standard of care treatment
Standard of care feeding:
Cue based po feeds done per the unit protocol
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PIONEER Protocol
* Oral nutritive stimulus with every feed (minimum 5mL)
* Esophageal stimulation with up to 15 stimulations given at least 5 times per week with stimulation catheter
* High resolution esophageal manometry as much as weekly if feasible throughout protocol
* Parent biofeedback (during manometry studies) and education on at least a weekly basis with focus on their participation in oral feeding
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Physiologically stable convalescing infants on full enteral feeds at greater than or equal to 37.0 weeks and less than 46 weeks postmenstrual age.
3. Presence of aerodigestive reflexes on diagnostic manometry.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Craniofacial defects (cleft lip or palate)
3. History of GI surgery, ENT surgery, or neurosurgery
4. Need for supplemental respiratory support of \>2 LPM
1 Week
6 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nationwide Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sudarshan Jadcherla
Physician - Neonatology Central Campus
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sudarshan Jadcherla
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00004923
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.