Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT ID: NCT07033650
Last Updated: 2025-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
87 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-25
2025-03-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Each case will be evaluated according to FDI criteria, based on both functional (Fracture of material and retention, Marginal adaptation, Occlusal contour and wear, Proximal contact point and food impaction, and Radiographic examination) and biological (Postoperative sensitivity, Recurrence of caries and Tooth integrity) properties. Bitewing radiographs and intra-oral photographs will be also used for assessment of all restorations.
Assessment of postoperative sensitivity and tooth vitality will be carried out on the patient by application of a cold stimulus (e.g. a blast of cold air). Postoperative sensitivity will be recorded at the time of restoration placement, and throughout all follow-up appointments, and include type of pain, discomfort and duration, and/or on stimulus at clinical assessment and should always be compared with the response of adjacent vital teeth. Intensity will be assessed also with a visual analogue scale (VAS) which is a commonly used tool for measuring pain.
On a scale of 1 to 5, restorations will be rated as follows; score 1: clinically excellent/very good, 2: clinically good, 3: clinically satisfactory, 4: clinically unsatisfactory but repairable and 5: clinically poor/irrepairable and in need of replacement. So the scores 1, 2 and 3 considered clinically successful while scores 4 and 5 considered clinically not successful.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Resistance and Bioactivity of Self Cured Bioactive Resin Composite
NCT07262086
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
NCT06183320
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be recruited from outpatient clinic of Operative Dentistry Department in Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University. Eligible patients will be examined clinically and radiographically using bite-wing radiography, and recruited according to the previously mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. All participants will sign written informed consents after being completely aware of the aim, settings, procedures, benefits and potential side effects of the study. The data from the study and consent forms will be written in Arabic so that every patient could understand them. Patients will be only admitted to the study after signing the informed consent.
Simple randomization will be assigned for 29 participants. Every patient will be diagnosed by examiners for three posterior class II carious lesions. Each tooth will be assigned by a number; R1 (Bulk fill RC), R2 (Snow plow tech) and R3 (Oscillating tech). Restoration numbers will be concealed in an opaque sealed envelope that will be held by a facilitator who will not involve in any of the phases of the clinical trial. Every patient will choose an envelope for each tooth. Patients and examiners will be blinded to the material assignment; the operator also will be blinded for the type of restoration during tooth preparation and will be informed only at the time of restoration placement.
Each case will be evaluated according to FDI criteria, based on both functional (Fracture of material and retention, Marginal adaptation, Occlusal contour and wear, Proximal contact point and food impaction, and Radiographic examination) and biological (Postoperative sensitivity, Recurrence of caries and Tooth integrity) properties. Assessment of restorations will be performed clinically by visual inspection using magnification loupes (4.5x; Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany), dental mirrors, a light source and FDI recommended probes with different tip diameters of 150 and 250 micrometer diameter (150x and 250x, Deppeler, Switzerland) . These probes will be used specially for evaluation of both marginal adaptation (functional property) and tooth integrity of enamel cracks and tooth fractures (biological property). Bitewing radiographs and intra-oral photographs will be also used for assessment of all restorations.
Assessment of postoperative sensitivity and tooth vitality will be carried out on the patient by application of a cold stimulus (e.g. a blast of cold air). Postoperative sensitivity will be recorded at the time of restoration placement, and throughout all follow-up appointments, and include type of pain, discomfort and duration, and/or on stimulus at clinical assessment and should always be compared with the response of adjacent vital teeth. Transient pain brought on by stimulation will be acceptable, while persistent pain renders the restoration unacceptable and necessitates intervention to resolve the problem. Intensity will be assessed also with a visual analogue scale (VAS) which is a commonly used tool for measuring pain.
On a scale of 1 to 5, restorations will be rated as follows; score 1: clinically excellent/very good, 2: clinically good, 3: clinically satisfactory, 4: clinically unsatisfactory but repairable and 5: clinically poor/irrepairable and in need of replacement. So the scores 1, 2 and 3 considered clinically successful while scores 4 and 5 considered clinically not successful.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
teeth will be restored with the packable Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Fil) with a single increment of 4 mm starting with the proximal boxes and cured for 10 s
Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Fil)
Bulk fill resin composite
Snowplow" technique
teeth will be restored using Snowplow technique where a 1 mm layer of flowable Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Base) will be deposited at the gingival margin of the prepared teeth and kept uncured. Then pushing a heavily filled packable nanohybrid resin composite (X-tra Fil) into the uncured flowable composite.
The combined layer of flowable and restorative composites will be then cured using LED curing unit for 10 s
Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Fil)
Bulk fill resin composite
flowable Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Base)
flowable resin composite
Oscillating technique
teeth will be restored using oscillating technique where the packable Bulk-fill composite material will be placed in bulk to fill the prepared cavity using a plastic filling instrument then the compothixo oscillating packing instrument will be used The oscillation energy (140 Hz) will be applied for 30 s, during which the composite will be adapted to all the cavity walls, and then light cured for 10 s.
Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Fil)
Bulk fill resin composite
compothixo oscillating packing
oscillating packing device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Fil)
Bulk fill resin composite
flowable Bulk-fill composite (X-tra Base)
flowable resin composite
compothixo oscillating packing
oscillating packing device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Only co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with severe bruxism, clenching or temporomandibular joint disorders.
* Patients with allergy to any components of the materials.
21 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Suez Canal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Basma hosny
Lecturer of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University
Ismailia, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
906/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.