The Osteoporotic Fracture Classification-based Scoring System for Treatment Decision in Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fractures
NCT ID: NCT07027306
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
648 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-12-01
2030-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study to Predict the Risk of Bone Fractures With the POROUS Ultrasound Device
NCT06567054
Osteoporosis Screening Tools' Re-validation in Egypt Guide for the Management of the Condition in Males
NCT03513107
Fracture Prediction by Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis
NCT03570177
The Construction of Bidirectional Column Study of Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
NCT06586996
Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine
NCT04399421
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All osteoporotic TL fractures will be classified using the OF classification system (OF 1 to OF 5). Only the most severe fracture will be used to calculate the OF score. The OF score will be subsequently calculated to aid the surgeons' decision making on the initial treatment plan, which is categorized as either nonsurgical or surgical treatment.
To address the primary study objective, depending on whether the treating surgeons' eventual initial treatment decisions agree with the OF score recommendations, patients will be divided into two groups: 1) patients whose initial treatment is in accordance with the OF score recommendations (the Accordance group), and 2) patients whose initial treatment is in discordance with the OF score recommendations (the Discordance group). Accordance refers to 1) when the OF score is \> 6, surgical treatment is prescribed by the treating surgeons, 2) when the OF score is \< 6, nonsurgical treatment only is prescribed by the treating surgeons, and 3) when the OF score is 6, either surgical or nonsurgical treatment is prescribed (Note: any surgeons' decision is deemed in accordance with the OF score as the system leaves the decision to the surgeons' discretion in this situation).
Accordance/Discordance group assignment is based on the agreement/discrepancy between the eventual treatment and the recommendations from the OF score that is obtained up to Day 0, although OF scores may be calculated at follow-ups (FUs) for subsequent treatment decision making (eg, whether the treatment plan needs to be modified).
Depending on the actual initial treatment assigned to the patients by the treating surgeons, patients will be divided into two groups: 1) patients assigned to receive nonsurgical treatment (the Nonsurgical group), and 2) patients assigned to receive surgery (the Surgical group).
Day 0 refers to the day when the initial treatment is decided and starts (categorized as nonsurgical or surgical treatment). Subsequent FUs will be calculated in reference to Day 0. Patients will be followed up clinically at discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
The primary outcome of the study is the return to the mobility level before the injury or symptom onset (as reported by the patient). The FU period for the primary endpoint of the study is 3 months (short-term), and 12 months for the secondary endpoints (long-term).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OF score accordance group
Initial treatment decision in accordance with the OF score recommendations
Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
* Any other type of solely vertebral augmentation (stents, etc.), specify
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation and kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with vertebral osteotomy (pedicle subtraction osteotomy or similar)
* Combined posterior and anterior stabilization
OF score discordance group
Initial treatment decision in discordance with the OF score recommendations
Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
* Any other type of solely vertebral augmentation (stents, etc.), specify
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation and kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with vertebral osteotomy (pedicle subtraction osteotomy or similar)
* Combined posterior and anterior stabilization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
* Any other type of solely vertebral augmentation (stents, etc.), specify
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws)
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with screw augmentation and kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty
* Posterior stabilization (pedicle screws) with vertebral osteotomy (pedicle subtraction osteotomy or similar)
* Combined posterior and anterior stabilization
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
o Menopause refers to amenorrhea for 1 complete year.
* Radiologically confirmed new diagnosis of symptomatic, single or multilevel TL (from T1 to L5) fractures, ie, the index fracture(s).
* In case of a multilevel fracture, the fracture must be contiguous.
* The index fracture is confirmed by MRI as an insufficiency (or fragility) fracture or is confirmed by CT or MRI as traumatic fracture (low-energy trauma)
* The index fracture(s) is a result of primary osteoporosis. Diagnosis of primary osteoporosis is based on any of the followings in the absence of causes for secondary osteoporosis (such as long-term use of steroids, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes mellitus \[DM\], and other metabolic bone disorders \[eg, rickets/osteomalacia, Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, and primary hyperparathyroidism\]) \[13-15\]:
* A T-score ≤ -2.5 in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, or 1/3 radius
* Presence of fragility fracture (either a previous fragility fracture or the index fracture is a fragility fracture). Fragility fractures are fractures due to no or low-energy trauma, eg, slips, trips, or falls from less than double the body height, and heavy lifting.
* The index osteoporotic TL fracture being classified based on the OF Classification from OF 1 to OF 5:
* OF 1: No deformation (vertebral body edema on MRI using short tau inversion recovery \[STIR\] sequence)
* OF 2: Deformation of one endplate
* OF 3: Deformation of one endplate with distinct posterior wall involvement
* OF 4: Deformation of both endplates with/without posterior wall involvement
* OF 5: Injuries with anterior or posterior tension band failure
* Ability to provide informed consent according to the EC/IRB defined and approved procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with concomitant cervical fractures
* Patients showing any signs of spinal infections
* Patients with fractures due to high-energy or high-impact trauma, eg, a fall from double the body height or higher, motor vehicle accident with \> 100 km/h in cars with airbags, or motor vehicle accident \> 50 km/h without airbags, polytrauma
* Patients with concomitant fracture in the pelvis, upper extremities, and/or lower extremities which could affect the main study outcomes (specifically, patient mobility and pain)
* Patients for whom no FUs are possible
* Previous instrumented surgery in the affected spine levels
* Patients with single-level fracture or contiguous multilevel fracture adjacent to previous instrumented surgery
* Patients who are mentally impaired and therefore not able to adhere to the study procedures and data collection
* Patients who are bedridden before the index fracture
* Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs and alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessments
* Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AO Foundation, AO Spine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Klaus Schnake, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California San Francisco (USCF) Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
San Francisco, California, United States
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Sanatorio Güemes
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Cajuru University Hospital
Curitiba, , Brazil
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago
Santiago, , Chile
Orthopaedic Department, Assiut University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine
Asyut, , Egypt
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, , Finland
Center for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien
Erlangen, , Germany
PGIMER - Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, , India
Dokkyo Medical University Hospital
Tochigi, , Japan
Island Hospital Spine Centre
George Town, , Malaysia
Spiatlul Clinic De Urgenta, "Profesor Doctor Nicolae Oblu"
Iași, , Romania
Security Force Hospital
Riyāḑ, , Saudi Arabia
Spital Emmental - Orthopädie Sonnenhof
Burgdorf, , Switzerland
King's College Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TL-OF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.