Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-05
2029-02-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objectives
Primary: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement system to assist the surgeon with achieving the surgeon's preplanned alignment-related parameters intraoperatively.
Secondary: To determine if there is a correlation between 1) achievement of preoperative planned alignment-related parameters intraoperatively, and 2) outcomes.
Hypothesis
The application of the intraoperative spinal measurement tool for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery will improve the surgeon's ability to achieve pre-planned alignment-related parameters intraoperatively and doing so will provide improved outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spine Registration Using 3D Scanning
NCT05195580
Collecting Bone Graft During Spinal Decompression and Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion to Better Define Bone Making Cells
NCT01409954
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981
"Is Instrumentation Necessary for "Static" Degenerative Spondylolisthesis"
NCT02530775
Safety and Effectiveness Study of Prodisc to Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT00295009
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The intraoperative spinal measurement system to be used is the Paradigm TM System by Proprio.
Patients will fill out ODI and SF-36 and will have a postoperative standing long x-ray or EOS at regular follow-up intervals (typically 6w, 3m, 6m, 12m, 24m).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thoracolumbosacral posterior spine surgery using intraoperative measurement system
To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement tool to assist the surgeon with achieving preoperatively planned alignment-related parameters during surgery. Patients may also be included when the surgeon uses another system or method for placement of the implants (i.e., other navigation system, robot, fluoroscopy, etc.) but also wants to utilize the measurement system. The data will be analyzed as a pool and stratified according to level and # of levels and other demographic and operative data to determine if there are differences.
Intraoperative spinal measurement system
The design is a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement tool to assist the surgeon with achieving preoperatively planned alignment-related parameters during surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intraoperative spinal measurement system
The design is a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement tool to assist the surgeon with achieving preoperatively planned alignment-related parameters during surgery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Type of Surgery: Consecutively scheduled patients where the measurement system will be used who will have thoracolumbosacral posterior spine surgery that includes spinal instrumentation and fusion and that consent to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Incarcerated persons
* Pregnant females
* Any patient current in another trial for a new implant or technique
* Non-Spine Related Surgeries: Patients who had surgeries for reasons other than spine-related conditions (even if they incidentally involved the spine)
* Patients having additional surgery occurring concurrently with spine surgery
* Patients ineligible for surgery
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Proprio Vision, Inc.
UNKNOWN
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brett Rocos, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Health System
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Finkelstein JA, Schwartz CE. Patient-reported outcomes in spine surgery: past, current, and future directions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Aug 1;31(2):155-164. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.SPINE18770. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Beighley A, Zhang A, Huang B, Carr C, Mathkour M, Werner C, Scullen T, Kilgore MD, Maulucci CM, Dallapiazza RF, Kalyvas J. Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):378-389. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_101_22. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
Lau KKL, Samartzis D, To NSC, Harada GK, An HS, Wong AYL. Demographic, Surgical, and Radiographic Risk Factors for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Aug 4;103(15):1438-1450. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00408.
Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, Sidhu GS, Rihn J, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS. Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1339-49. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
Ikard RW. Methods and complications of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Arch Surg. 2006 Oct;141(10):1025-34. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.10.1025.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00118206
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.