Gas Composition in the Hypopharynx During High-flow or Standard Oxygen Therapy Through Face Mask in Healthy Volunteers

NCT ID: NCT07019701

Last Updated: 2025-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-14

Study Completion Date

2025-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The COVID-19 pandemic has become a huge global problem, affecting all spheres of human life, resulting in enormous social, economic consequences and human tragedies. With very decent results of treatment of patients of average severity in the conditions of bed units, the results of treatment of the most severe category - patients of intensive care units who required tracheal intubation remain extremely unsatisfactory. According to different data, mortality in this category of patients reaches 80-90%. However, observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown high efficiency of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas, reaching 50-60%. Some pilot bench studies (on manikins) have shown the advantages of high-flow oxygen therapy over standard oxygen therapy in reducing anatomical dead space and preserving a given inspiratory fraction of oxygen in the laryngeal pharynx of the manikin, but the actual state of the laryngeal pharyngeal gas composition was not studied. Some patients breathe through open mouth that decreases the efficacy oh high flow oxygen through nasal cannula. The aim of the study is to measure the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) oxygen fractions and the inspiratory and expiratory carbon dioxide fractions (FiCO2 and FeCO2, respectively) in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and during standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask under different physiological conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Randomized controlled trials showed reduction of tracheal intubation in high- flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula group in patients with acute respiratory failure as compared to standard oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation before Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic.

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic of COVID-19 on March 11th, 2020. Since then observational, randomized studies and their meta-analyses have shown the high effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannulas (HFNC), reaching 50-60% in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Bench studies showed the advantages of HFNC compared with standard oxygen therapy, consisting in reducing the anatomical dead space and maintaining a given inspiratory oxygen fraction in the hypopharynx of the mannequin, but the actual state of the gas composition of the hypopharynx during HFNC was not studied. Some patients breathe through open mouth that decreases the efficacy oh high flow oxygen through nasal cannula.

The aim of the study is to measure the inspiratory (FiO2) and expiratory (FeO2) oxygen fractions and the inspiratory and expiratory carbon dioxide fractions (FiCO2 and FeCO2, respectively) in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers during high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula and face mask, and during standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask under different physiological conditions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Volunteers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oxygen therapy

High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers in different physiological conditions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx

Intervention Type DEVICE

High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers in different physiological conditions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx

High flow oxygen through nasal cannula and face mask, and standard oxygen therapy through non-rebreather face mask, and measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide fraction in the hypopharynx of healthy volunteers in different physiological conditions

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy Volunteers
* Age 18-50 years
* Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any primary or secondary lung diseases (COPD, bronchial asthma, interstitial lung diseases, metastatic lung disease, lung cancer)
* Any chronic diseases that can cause respiratory disorders (chronic heart failure, liver cirrhosis, systemic connective tissue diseases, cancer, neuromuscular diseases etc)
* Heart rhythm disturbances
* Body mass index more than 30 kg/m2
* Swallowing disorders
* History of epileptic syndrome
* Recent head surgery or anatomy that precludes the use of nasal cannulas
* Pregnancy and lactation period
* Inability to cooperate with staff.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrey I Yaroshetskiy, MD, PhD, ScD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sechenov University Clinic#4

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrey I Yaroshetskiy, MD, PhD, ScD

Role: CONTACT

+79859900148

Sergey N Avdeev, MD, PhD, ScD

Role: CONTACT

+79166145825

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Andrey I Yaroshetskiy, Md, PhD, ScD

Role: primary

+79859900148

Sergey N Avdeev, MD, PhD, ScD

Role: backup

+79166145825

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perkins GD, Ji C, Connolly BA, Couper K, Lall R, Baillie JK, Bradley JM, Dark P, Dave C, De Soyza A, Dennis AV, Devrell A, Fairbairn S, Ghani H, Gorman EA, Green CA, Hart N, Hee SW, Kimbley Z, Madathil S, McGowan N, Messer B, Naisbitt J, Norman C, Parekh D, Parkin EM, Patel J, Regan SE, Ross C, Rostron AJ, Saim M, Simonds AK, Skilton E, Stallard N, Steiner M, Vancheeswaran R, Yeung J, McAuley DF; RECOVERY-RS Collaborators. Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19: The RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):546-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35072713 (View on PubMed)

Ospina-Tascon GA, Calderon-Tapia LE, Garcia AF, Zarama V, Gomez-Alvarez F, Alvarez-Saa T, Pardo-Otalvaro S, Bautista-Rincon DF, Vargas MP, Aldana-Diaz JL, Marulanda A, Gutierrez A, Varon J, Gomez M, Ochoa ME, Escobar E, Umana M, Diez J, Tobon GJ, Albornoz LL, Celemin Florez CA, Ruiz GO, Caceres EL, Reyes LF, Damiani LP, Cavalcanti AB; HiFLo-Covid Investigators. Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2161-2171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20714.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34874419 (View on PubMed)

He Y, Zhuang X, Liu H, Ma W. Comparison of the efficacy and comfort of high-flow nasal cannula with different initial flow settings in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Intensive Care. 2023 May 10;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00667-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37165464 (View on PubMed)

Grieco DL, Maggiore SM, Roca O, Spinelli E, Patel BK, Thille AW, Barbas CSV, de Acilu MG, Cutuli SL, Bongiovanni F, Amato M, Frat JP, Mauri T, Kress JP, Mancebo J, Antonelli M. Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Aug;47(8):851-866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06459-2. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34232336 (View on PubMed)

Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25981908 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HFNC2-OXIMETRY

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.