Optimal Duration of Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Procedure: Length and Diagnostic Accuracy
NCT ID: NCT07016581
Last Updated: 2025-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-05
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Implantable Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Management System
NCT00205855
Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial to Permanent Prediction
NCT05659836
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Predominant Low Back Pain
NCT01697358
Restore Claims Characterization Study
NCT00200122
Study Using the SpinalStim Device Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery
NCT03176303
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Given the infectious risks associated with an SCS trial, including those associated with significant morbidity and mortality, the typical duration of an SCS trial procedure ranges from 3 to 14 days. Additionally, given the risks for epidural hematoma formation, patients on certain anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications require medication cessation prior to and across the SCS trial duration. In these scenarios, prolonging the withholding of these medications can place these patients at serious risks for serious embolic and/or vascular events. However, while reducing the duration an SCS trial procedure may help mitigate the risks for serious infectious and embolic and/or vascular events, patients with chronic pain conditions may typically need several days to achieve and report meaningful analgesic and functional responses and willingness to proceed with a permanent SCS implantation procedure. However, the optimal duration required for an SCS trial response has yet to be clearly established.
In this study, we aim to explore the optimal duration of the SCS trial procedure and assess how daily pain levels and patient satisfaction impact the decision to permanently implant a SCS device. The primary objective is to determine the optimal number of days required to accurately predict SCS trial procedure outcomes.
This prospective, multi-center study will enroll a target of 100 patients undergoing an SCS trial procedure (conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site). In addition to demographics, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, SCS e-health tool recommendations, and key SCS parameters, patients will complete daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit across the duration of the SCS trial. Analyses will be performed to determine: 1) the number of days it takes to define final trial outcomes (for positive responders and not-positive responders); 2) if and how PROMIS domains correlate with days to define final trial outcomes; and 3) if and how SCS e-health tool recommendations correlate with days to define final trial outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Cohort
Adult patients with chronic pain undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure
Daily survey
All patients undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure (which will be conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site) will be given daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Daily survey
All patients undergoing an spinal cord stimulation trial procedure (which will be conducted in accordance to standard clinical practices per site) will be given daily surveys to assess their analgesic and functional benefit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical evidence of a chronic pain condition amenable for treatment with spinal cord stimulation
* Chronic pain duration \>12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
* Worker's compensation status
* Previously failed spinal cord stimulation trial
* Chronic opioid use with \>50 morphine milligram equivalents
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Ohio State University
OTHER
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
University of Maryland, Baltimore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jay Karri
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jay Karri, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Maryland
Ryan D'Souza, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP-00113001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.