Effect of Different Oral Splints on the Maximum Bite Force in TMD Patients
NCT ID: NCT07016256
Last Updated: 2025-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-01
2025-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Do intraoral splints enhance maximal clenching force in patients with muscle-related TMD? Is there a difference in the effectiveness of the three splint designs in improving muscle strength? Researchers will compare the effects of each splint within the same participants to determine which one most effectively increases clenching force.
Participants will:
Undergo baseline assessment of maximal mandibular clenching force Use each intraoral splint for a 30-day period Complete follow-up assessments after each intervention phase
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Behavioral Therapy and Self-care vs Thermoformed Occlusal Splints in the Treatment of Masticatory Muscles Pain
NCT04588636
Effects of Occlusal Splint vs Occlusal Splint Added to Manual Therapy in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders
NCT06859138
Efficiency of Neuromuscular Bite vs Physiotherapy in TMD Patients
NCT02946645
Effects of the Use of Occlusal Splint on the Postural Balance of Individuals With Temporomandibular Disorder
NCT02251015
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
25 participants received the Lucia Jig splint 25 participants received the Sved splint 25 participants received the Occlusal splint All participants were previously diagnosed with muscle-related TMD by a qualified clinician. Each participant served as their own control. Baseline measurements of maximum bite force were recorded prior to the intervention using a gnatodynamometer (Kratos, Brazil). Measurements were taken in two anatomical zones: the incisal zone and the molar zone.
For each zone, three consecutive bite force measurements were recorded, with a 5-minute rest interval between each trial. The average of the three measurements was calculated and used as the baseline value for each zone.
Participants were instructed to use their assigned intraoral splint nightly for a period of 30 days. After this period, they returned for a follow-up assessment. The same measurement protocol was repeated: three bite force recordings in both the incisal and molar zones, each separated by a 5-minute interval. The average of these three post-intervention values was calculated for comparison with the baseline.
This within-subject design allows for the evaluation of changes in bite force attributable to each splint type, and for comparison across the three splint designs. The study seeks to determine whether intraoral splints can enhance muscle strength in patients with myogenous TMD, and which design is most effective in doing so.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lucia jig
Lucia jig splint
intraoral devices
Intraoral devices not registed with a patent
Sved splint
Sved splint
intraoral devices
Intraoral devices not registed with a patent
Occlusal splint
Occlusal splint
intraoral devices
Intraoral devices not registed with a patent
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intraoral devices
Intraoral devices not registed with a patent
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not using ant
* Non pregnant women.
* Not under convulsive, chronic pain, antidepresive, antihypertensive, pharmacological treatments
* Without systemic pathologies.
Exclusion Criteria
* Regular use of benzodiazepines.
* Systemic pathologies
* Pregnant women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Vina del Mar
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolás Pinto Pardo
Nicolas Pinto-Pardo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidad Viña del Mar
Viña del Mar, Región de Valparaíso, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UVMODO012025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.