Effect of Different Oral Splints on the Maximum Bite Force in TMD Patients

NCT ID: NCT07016256

Last Updated: 2025-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2025-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether three different types of intraoral splints can increase maximal voluntary mandibular clenching force in adults diagnosed with myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do intraoral splints enhance maximal clenching force in patients with muscle-related TMD? Is there a difference in the effectiveness of the three splint designs in improving muscle strength? Researchers will compare the effects of each splint within the same participants to determine which one most effectively increases clenching force.

Participants will:

Undergo baseline assessment of maximal mandibular clenching force Use each intraoral splint for a 30-day period Complete follow-up assessments after each intervention phase

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of three different types of intraoral splints on maximal voluntary bite force in patients diagnosed with myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A total of 150 participants were recruited, consisting of 75 men and 75 women. Each gender group was evenly divided into three intervention arms:

25 participants received the Lucia Jig splint 25 participants received the Sved splint 25 participants received the Occlusal splint All participants were previously diagnosed with muscle-related TMD by a qualified clinician. Each participant served as their own control. Baseline measurements of maximum bite force were recorded prior to the intervention using a gnatodynamometer (Kratos, Brazil). Measurements were taken in two anatomical zones: the incisal zone and the molar zone.

For each zone, three consecutive bite force measurements were recorded, with a 5-minute rest interval between each trial. The average of the three measurements was calculated and used as the baseline value for each zone.

Participants were instructed to use their assigned intraoral splint nightly for a period of 30 days. After this period, they returned for a follow-up assessment. The same measurement protocol was repeated: three bite force recordings in both the incisal and molar zones, each separated by a 5-minute interval. The average of these three post-intervention values was calculated for comparison with the baseline.

This within-subject design allows for the evaluation of changes in bite force attributable to each splint type, and for comparison across the three splint designs. The study seeks to determine whether intraoral splints can enhance muscle strength in patients with myogenous TMD, and which design is most effective in doing so.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscular TMD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

75 men and 75 women diagnosed with muscular TMD, dividen in 3 groups (25 patients each) to evaluate 3 different oral splints on the maximum bite force
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lucia jig

Lucia jig splint

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intraoral devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intraoral devices not registed with a patent

Sved splint

Sved splint

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intraoral devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intraoral devices not registed with a patent

Occlusal splint

Occlusal splint

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intraoral devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intraoral devices not registed with a patent

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intraoral devices

Intraoral devices not registed with a patent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed with muscular TMD
* Not using ant
* Non pregnant women.
* Not under convulsive, chronic pain, antidepresive, antihypertensive, pharmacological treatments
* Without systemic pathologies.

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment for chronic pain, depression, hypertension, convulsion condition with or without medication.
* Regular use of benzodiazepines.
* Systemic pathologies
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Vina del Mar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolás Pinto Pardo

Nicolas Pinto-Pardo

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad Viña del Mar

Viña del Mar, Región de Valparaíso, Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UVMODO012025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.