Characterising Physiological Resilience in People With Parkinson's Disease

NCT ID: NCT07013513

Last Updated: 2025-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a condition that affects movement and gets worse over time. It is more common in older adults. People with PD may have symptoms like shaking, stiff muscles, slow movement, and trouble with balance. They may also experience other issues like pain, depression, anxiety, and memory problems, which can make daily life harder.

Physiological resilience is the body's ability to recover or stay strong despite challenges like aging or illness. People with low resilience may struggle to cope with illness, become less active, and have a higher risk of weakness or hospitalization. Since both PD and low resilience are more common in older adults, understanding how PD affects resilience can help improve care.

This study will look at resilience in people with PD by measuring heart, lung, muscle, coordination, memory, and thinking abilities. It will also compare two types of single-session aerobic exercise-cycling and walking on a treadmill-regarding participants' perspectives. Participants will be randomly chosen to do one of these exercises for 40 minutes at a moderate level. Afterward, they will share their thoughts on how enjoyable and comfortable the exercise was and whether they would continue doing it.

Aerobic exercise is often recommended for people with PD, but it is unclear which type is best for people with PD and which type is mostly preferred by participants with PD. The results of this study will help practitioners make better exercise recommendations for people with PD, leading to better symptom management and a higher quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Parkinson's is a chronic, progressive, neurodegenerative movement disorder. Both genetic and environmental factors may contribute to the development of Parkinson's in an individual. The onset of PD before the age of 50 is rare but does become more common as people age, affecting \~1% of adults over the age of 60 and 4% of those over 85. The most important motor signs of PD are rest tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and postural instability. Abnormalities in gait, balance, eye movement, posture, speech, and facial expressions are common. Poor balance, gait disturbance, and impaired mobility are among the most important research priorities identified by people living with PD. Furthermore, people with PD frequently experience non-motor symptoms such as pain, anxiety, depression, dementia, and constipation. Collectively, these symptoms lead to deterioration in quality of life, impaired ability to perform activities of daily living, and reduced functional independence, and motor performance.

Physiological resilience refers to the capacity to retain or regain physical function in the presence of diseases or age-related impairments. Poor resilience may raise the likelihood of being vulnerable to stresses, which could lead to negative functional and clinical consequences like a prolonged course of illness/hospitalization, reduced physical activity, an elevated risk of frailty, and even mortality. It is important to assess older populations' physiological resilience (check their readiness levels for potential future stressors). Since the risk of low resilience and prevalence of PD increase with advanced age, there is a relationship between low physiological resilience and PD due to the fact that it can deteriorate the parameters of resilience. Therefore, it is important to explore the characteristics of physiological resilience in PD populations.

This study will explore the characteristics of physiological resilience in terms of muscle strength, muscle mass, neuromuscular function, functional ability, cardiorespiratory fitness, dexterity, and cognition in people with PD.

Moreover, among the several exercise modalities implemented in the rehabilitation of PD symptoms, aerobic exercise is the most frequently employed and it is also a crucial component of the exercise regimen for people with PD according to European and American guidelines, which has been stated as a beneficial tool to promote physiological resilience at all stages of life. However, there is a lack of information in the literature on which aerobic exercise modality is better for this purpose in people with PD. Beyond the investigation of physiological resilience parameters in individuals with PD, this study will also provide valuable feedback from this population group on two single-bout aerobic exercises (cycling vs treadmill walking). Participants will be randomised to conduct either cycling or treadmill walking. Each of these two aerobic exercise sessions will last for 40 minutes and will be conducted at moderate intensity (estimated according to the heart rate maximum (HRmax)). Having conducted a single-bout aerobic exercise session; participants will be asked to complete scales about 'exercise enjoyment, tolerability, emotional state, and intention to continue exercising' as feedback. This study will inform future guidelines for exercise prescriptions for PD rehabilitation. It will be a cross-sectional study that collects data at a single-time point.

Potential participants identified will be sent the PIS. The study will be explained via email or over the phone by a member of the research team if needed. Participants who are willing to participate in the study will then be invited to attend the Medical school at the Royal Derby Hospital site for a screening session. The study will include two visits: 1) screening day, 2) assessment day. We will have a pre-screening via telephone call or email to check they meet the eligibility criteria: diagnosed with PD, adequately mobile (able to walk 30 meters), and willing to take part. If these initial points are satisfied, then participants will be invited for a screening session.

At the screening session, written informed consent will be received from the participants since it is an essential legal and ethical consideration before conducting tests for exercising in health, fitness, and clinical settings. Following completion of the consent process, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, and medical history including previous and current medication usage will be collected via a screening sheet. The unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) will be used to evaluate the severity of PD. This scale consists of 42 items divided into four categories: Section I (mentation, behaviour, and mood), Section II (activities of daily living, graded as "on" or "off"), Section III (motor exam), and Section IV (complications). The UPDRS battery also includes the Hoehn and Yahr, and the Schwab and England scales.

Participants will have a chance to ask any questions about the study protocol, screening, and eligibility assessments. Screening results will be discussed with a clinician to decide participants' eligibility. If an abnormal screening result is encountered, this will be discussed with the participant, and their GP will be informed in writing. Only those parts of the assessment visit that participants feel comfortable performing will be required of. Participants will have direct supervision from a member of the research team at all times.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants who are willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
* Participants who can walk 30 meters with or without walking aids
* Participants who have a confirmed diagnosis of Parkinson's disease by a healthcare professional.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardio- and/or pulmonary diseases except for well-controlled hypertension and asthma
* Severe cognitive impairment/dementia
* Joint disorders preventing exercise participation
* Current or recent (\<2 years) malignancy (excluding minor cancers such as skin cancer, or not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the last 3 months)
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nottingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bethan Phillips

Professor of Translational Physiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mehmet C Yildirim

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The University of Nottingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Nottingham/Medical School

Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bethan E Phillips

Role: CONTACT

+44 (0) 1332 724676

Jemima Collins

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bethan E Phillips, Professor

Role: primary

+44 (0) 1332724676

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang YC, Bohannon RW, Kapellusch J, Garg A, Gershon RC. Dexterity as measured with the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) across the age span. J Hand Ther. 2015 Jan-Mar;28(1):53-9; quiz 60. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25449717 (View on PubMed)

Singh NB, Arampatzis A, Duda G, Heller MO, Taylor WR. Effect of fatigue on force fluctuations in knee extensors in young adults. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010 Jun 13;368(1920):2783-98. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0091.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20439273 (View on PubMed)

Santana MG, de Lira CA, Passos GS, Santos CA, Silva AH, Yoshida CH, Tufik S, de Mello MT. Is the six-minute walk test appropriate for detecting changes in cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy elderly men? J Sci Med Sport. 2012 May;15(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.11.249. Epub 2011 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22154397 (View on PubMed)

Dourado VZ, Nishiaka RK, Simoes MSMP, Lauria VT, Tanni SE, Godoy I, Gagliardi ART, Romiti M, Arantes RL. Classification of cardiorespiratory fitness using the six-minute walk test in adults: Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Pulmonology. 2021 Nov-Dec;27(6):500-508. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33958319 (View on PubMed)

Przkora R, Kinsky MP, Fisher SR, Babl C, Heyde CE, Vasilopoulos T, Kaye AD, Volpi E. Functional Improvements Utilizing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in the Elderly after Epidural Steroid Injections. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Feb 22;23(2):14. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0748-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30796532 (View on PubMed)

Gojanovic M, Holloway-Kew KL, Hyde NK, Mohebbi M, Shivappa N, Hebert JR, O'Neil A, Pasco JA. The Dietary Inflammatory Index Is Associated with Low Muscle Mass and Low Muscle Function in Older Australians. Nutrients. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):1166. doi: 10.3390/nu13041166.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33916033 (View on PubMed)

Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30312372 (View on PubMed)

Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, Corsi AM, Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):1851-60. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14555665 (View on PubMed)

Meldrum D, Cahalane E, Conroy R, Fitzgerald D, Hardiman O. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction: reference values and clinical application. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2007 Feb;8(1):47-55. doi: 10.1080/17482960601012491.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17364436 (View on PubMed)

Scott JM, Martin DS, Ploutz-Snyder R, Matz T, Caine T, Downs M, Hackney K, Buxton R, Ryder JW, Ploutz-Snyder L. Panoramic ultrasound: a novel and valid tool for monitoring change in muscle mass. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Jun;8(3):475-481. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12172. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28052593 (View on PubMed)

Mijnarends DM, Meijers JM, Halfens RJ, ter Borg S, Luiking YC, Verlaan S, Schoberer D, Cruz Jentoft AJ, van Loon LJ, Schols JM. Validity and reliability of tools to measure muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Mar;14(3):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Dec 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23276432 (View on PubMed)

Lee SY, Ahn S, Kim YJ, Ji MJ, Kim KM, Choi SH, Jang HC, Lim S. Comparison between Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analyses for Accuracy in Measuring Whole Body Muscle Mass and Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass. Nutrients. 2018 Jun 7;10(6):738. doi: 10.3390/nu10060738.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29880741 (View on PubMed)

Bjorkman F, Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom O, Ekblom B. Validity of the revised Ekblom Bak cycle ergometer test in adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Sep;116(9):1627-38. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3412-0. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27311582 (View on PubMed)

Sampedro-Piquero P, Moreno-Fernandez RD. Building Resilience with Aerobic Exercise: Role of FKBP5. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(8):1156-1160. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210408124937.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33829973 (View on PubMed)

Cosco TD, Howse K, Brayne C. Healthy ageing, resilience and wellbeing. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Dec;26(6):579-583. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000324. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28679453 (View on PubMed)

Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2284-2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00218-X. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33848468 (View on PubMed)

Berganzo K, Tijero B, Gonzalez-Eizaguirre A, Somme J, Lezcano E, Gabilondo I, Fernandez M, Zarranz JJ, Gomez-Esteban JC. Motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease and their impact on quality of life and on different clinical subgroups. Neurologia. 2016 Nov-Dec;31(9):585-591. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 17. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25529173 (View on PubMed)

Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul;18(7):435-450. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.62. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28592904 (View on PubMed)

Pan-Montojo F, Anichtchik O, Dening Y, Knels L, Pursche S, Jung R, Jackson S, Gille G, Spillantini MG, Reichmann H, Funk RH. Progression of Parkinson's disease pathology is reproduced by intragastric administration of rotenone in mice. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 19;5(1):e8762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008762.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20098733 (View on PubMed)

Jankovic J. Parkinson's disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;79(4):368-76. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18344392 (View on PubMed)

Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD. The prevalence of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2014 Nov;29(13):1583-90. doi: 10.1002/mds.25945. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24976103 (View on PubMed)

Alves G, Forsaa EB, Pedersen KF, Dreetz Gjerstad M, Larsen JP. Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 2008 Sep;255 Suppl 5:18-32. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-5004-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18787879 (View on PubMed)

Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson disease in 2015: Evolving basic, pathological and clinical concepts in PD. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Feb;12(2):65-6. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.249. Epub 2016 Jan 18. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26782330 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMHS 82-0225

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment Burden in Parkinson's
NCT04769973 COMPLETED
Personalizing Exercise for Parkinson Disease
NCT04782518 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING