Effects of Ropivacaine Concentrations on Prolonged Labor Analgesia

NCT ID: NCT07007650

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-14

Study Completion Date

2025-09-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With the changes in medical models and improvements in people's quality of life, parturients have higher demands for childbirth, making the alleviation and elimination of labor pain an important aspect of modern obstetrics. Intrathecal labor analgesia has been widely adopted in clinical practice to relieve pain. However, current studies mainly focus on parturients who are just beginning to receive labor analgesia, while for those experiencing prolonged analgesia, medical institutions still use traditional formulations, lacking relevant guidelines or expert consensus. In such cases, prolonged waiting and anxiety may lower the pain tolerance of parturients, leading to an increased need for higher concentrations of local anesthetics. To address this clinical gap, this study aims to explore the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in prolonged labor analgesia and has designed a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide evidence for improving the analgesic regimen for this group of parturients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

With changes in medical models and improvements in quality of life, parturients have higher expectations for childbirth, making the alleviation and elimination of labor pain an important aspect of modern obstetrics. Intrathecal labor analgesia is widely used in clinical practice to relieve labor pain. However, studies on prolonged labor analgesia, especially following the replacement of the first analgesic pump, are scarce. Medical institutions often continue to use traditional analgesic formulations without relevant guidelines or expert consensus. Prolonged analgesia may reduce pain tolerance in parturients, possibly necessitating adjustments in local anesthetic concentration to improve analgesic effectiveness. Given the clinical research gap, this study aims to explore the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine on prolonged labor analgesia and its impact on maternal and neonatal safety.

Objective:

To investigate the effects and maternal-neonatal safety of using different concentrations of ropivacaine for prolonged labor analgesia, providing clinical evidence for optimizing labor analgesia regimens.

Methods:

This single-center prospective randomized controlled study will collect clinical data from parturients receiving labor analgesia at Chengdu Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital from May to August 2025. Participants meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included. Following the replacement of the first analgesic pump, parturients will be randomly assigned to receive one of two ropivacaine concentration regimens (Group H: 0.12% ropivacaine; Group N: 0.1% ropivacaine). Data collection will include demographic information, pain scores, labor-related parameters, neonatal outcomes, and adverse reactions.

Interventions:

1. Group H: 0.12% ropivacaine + 0.5µg/ml sufentanil
2. Group N: 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.5µg/ml sufentanil Following the replacement of the first analgesic pump, parturients will receive the respective ropivacaine concentration formulation, with pain relief effects and labor-related indicators assessed at specified intervals.

Primary Outcome:

Pain scores at different time points (T0: at pump replacement; T1: 0.5 hours after pump replacement; T2: 1 hour after pump replacement; T3: at full cervical dilation or during transition to cesarean section).

Secondary Outcomes:

1. Labor-related indicators: Duration of first, second, and third stages of labor, blood loss, rate of instrumental delivery, mode of delivery (vaginal/cesarean).
2. Neonatal indicators: Neonatal weight, Apgar scores at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes.
3. Adverse reactions: Hypotension, nausea/vomiting, intrapartum fever (T≥38.0℃).

Hypothesis:

Different concentrations of ropivacaine for prolonged intrathecal labor analgesia will have varying effects on pain control and maternal-neonatal safety, with higher concentration ropivacaine (0.12%) likely being more effective in pain relief, while both concentrations are expected to show no significant difference in maternal and neonatal safety.

Ethics Approval:

This study has received approval from the ethics committee of Chengdu Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Approval Number: 202312). All participants must sign an informed consent form to ensure the respect of participant rights and data confidentiality. The study will strictly adhere to relevant ethical standards and legal regulations to protect participant safety and privacy.

Funding:

This study is funded by the following projects:

1. Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2023465)
2. Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2022548)
3. Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2023304)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Analgesia Prolonged Ropivacaine Concentration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
A double-blind design is a research method aimed at eliminating bias between participants and researchers. In this design, participants are randomly assigned to different intervention groups (such as different concentrations of ropivacaine), and neither the participants nor the researchers responsible for evaluating the results are aware of the specific group allocations. This ensures the objectivity and reliability of the research findings, avoiding the influence of subjective expectations or observational biases on data interpretation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

high concentration ropivacaine group

The combination of 0.12% ropivacaine and 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-concentration Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Low concentration ropivacaine group.

The combination of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low concentration ropivacaine group

Intervention Type DRUG

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-concentration Ropivacaine

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Low concentration ropivacaine group

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ASA II
2. Age ≥ 18 years
3. Singleton pregnancy
4. No contraindications for epidural puncture and voluntarily accepting labor analgesia
5. Maternal participants changing the first pump fluid

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindications for epidural labor analgesia
2. Serious heart, brain, liver, or kidney diseases
3. Mental abnormalities
4. Neurological diseases
5. Maternal request for management of breakthrough pain before changing the pump fluid
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chengdu Jinjiang Maternity and Child Health Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fei Jia

Director of Anesthesiology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chengdu Jinjiang District Women & Children Health Hospital,

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bo Liu, MS

Role: CONTACT

+8618502846036

Fei Jia, MD

Role: CONTACT

+8618581877655

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

jianjun mao, BS

Role: primary

+8615008460156

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jian Z, Longqing R, Dayuan W, Fei J, Bo L, Gang Z, Siying Z, Yan G. Prolonged duration of epidural labour analgesia decreases the success rate of epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1112-1117. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2067353.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35443838 (View on PubMed)

Ni JX, Feng JL, Yao SJ, Ni LF, Song SB, Song CZ, Qian XW, Mei Z, Yu J. Determination of the Dose-Response Relationship of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine for Labor Analgesia. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Mar 6;16:609-618. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S346842. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35281318 (View on PubMed)

Tan HS, Reed SE, Mehdiratta JE, Diomede OI, Landreth R, Gatta LA, Weikel D, Habib AS. Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study. Anesthesiology. 2022 May 1;136(5):678-687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35157756 (View on PubMed)

Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0909254. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20410515 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202312

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA
NCT02278601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3
Drotaverine to Shorten the Length of Labor
NCT01639027 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Effect of Hyoscine and Promethazine on Labor Pain
NCT01644838 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3