Effect of Different Labour Analgesics on Maternal and Fetal Blood Flow Observed by Doppler Ultrasonography
NCT ID: NCT06099938
Last Updated: 2023-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-01
2022-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: A total of 90 singleton full-term parturients who were evaluated by obstetricians for feasible vaginal delivery were collected prospectively and divided into three groups based on the randomization and double-blind principle: sufentanil (S), ropivacaine (R) group, each with 30 cases. Main indicators include color doppler blood flow resistance indices (S/D) of the uterine artery (UtA), umbilical artery (UA), and middle cerebral artery (MCA) before (T0) and 30 minutes (T1), 60 minutes (T2), 90minutes (T3) after analgesia. Fetal heart rate (FHR), maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) at T0, T1, T2 and T3。
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Association Between Epidural Labor Analgesia and Pregnancy Outcomes
NCT03381495
Sufentanil Pharmacokinetics After Intra Amniotic Injection
NCT02962830
Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia
NCT06036797
Spinal Sufentanil for Obstetric Analgesia
NCT04141527
Epidural Labor Analgesia and Infant Neurobehavior
NCT00987441
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Study intervention At the time of request for labor analgesia, patients were randomized to receive either sufentanil 5 μg (Group S) and ropivacaine 3mg (Group R) into the subarachnoid space. All groups received the standard epidural solution that contained 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.25 μg/ml sufentanil. Routine obstetric and anaesthetic monitoring was given after maternal entered the delivery room. An experienced the anesthesiologist select L3-4 lumbar vertebra clearance to puncture with standard sterile technique using loss of resistance when the puerpera palace has expanded to about 3 cm. After the puncture reached the epidural space, a 25-gauge lumbar anesthesia needle was used to puncture into the subarachnoid space. 2 mL of anesthetic drug as determined by her group randomization were administered into the cavity through the lumbar anesthesia needle after cerebrospinal fluid flow out. A 19-gauge spring-wound catheter was threaded 4-6 cm into the epidural space. All patients received a test dose of 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine followed by an initial loading dose of 5 ml of the standard epidural solution. Epidural catheters into vessels or subarachnoid space were excluded. An analgesic pump (PCEA pump, 100ml) containing standard epidural solution was then connected to the epidural catheter at a background continuous infusion rate of 5 mL/h. The visual analogue score for pain (VAS) was performed 15 minutes after the injection dose, and if the VAS score fell below 3, the case was included in the study.
An anesthesia provider assessed the adequacy of analgesia for the patients throughout the duration of labor. Any breakthrough pain was managed with a physician-administered epidural bolus. All obstetric analgesia procedures were performed by the same anesthesiologist to reduce errors due to technical reasons.
3. Ultrasonic examination method The patients were placed in a supine position with calm breathing to perform doppler ultrasonography during the interval of contractions. Ultrasound probe was placed on fetal head area. Middle cerebral arteries (MCA) run anteriorly on both sides of the ring of cerebral arteries at the position of the double head diameter (see Figure 1A). We can get waveforms of MCA examined by pulsed wave doppler (see Figure 1B). The probe was placed at the placenta area, and we can see the fetal umbilical cord connecting to the center of the placenta. Umbilical artery (UA) could be identified by color flow, and its waveforms were examined by pulsed wave doppler (see Figure 1C and 1D). The probe was placed at the midpoint of the groin. The right and left uterine arteries (UtA) could be identified by color flow at the apparent crossover with the external iliac arteries, and pulsed wave doppler was used to obtain waveforms (see Figure 1E and 1F). 3 to 10 arterial spectrograms with clear edges and no background noise at baseline were selected. The above arterial blood flow indexes were measured three times and the average value was taken. The S/Dvalue of MCA、UA、UtA can be measured automatically by ultrasound instrument. All doppler examinations were performed by the same sonographer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group S
intrathecal injections of sufentanil
sufentanil, ropivacaine
The study used conventional anesthetic drugs to compare the effects of the two drugs on maternal and infant blood flow
Group R
intrathecal injections of ropivacaine
sufentanil, ropivacaine
The study used conventional anesthetic drugs to compare the effects of the two drugs on maternal and infant blood flow
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sufentanil, ropivacaine
The study used conventional anesthetic drugs to compare the effects of the two drugs on maternal and infant blood flow
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged 20 to 35 years
3. Weighing 50 to 100 kg
4. 150-175 cm in height
5. 37 to 41 weeks of gestation
Exclusion Criteria
2. Maternal complications (such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, etc.)
3. Abnormal uterine contractions
4. Abnormal placental function or position
5. Signs of fetal distress
6. Known fetal malformations
20 Years
35 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yuqiong Liu
principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xuemei Peng, Ph.d
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
june617
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.