Impact of a Counseling Consultation in the Workplace for Smoker Health Professionals
NCT ID: NCT06988644
Last Updated: 2025-05-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-11
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Data on smoking among health professionals is still scarce. Yet they seem essential, given that smoking among healthcare professionals seems to be an obstacle to dealing with patients' consumption and contributes to the erroneous representations that persist in psychiatry more than elsewhere, such as: "smoking with a patient makes an alliance with them", "smoking is a way of reducing psychological tension", "patients have other problems to deal with", "it won't work because they've been smoking for years". Smoking in mental health facilities is high among both patients and professionals.
Investigators now know that smoking has an impact on mood disorders and sleep. It aggravates all somatic and psychological pathologies and predisposes people to more diabetes, chronic bronchitis, cardiovascular disease, cancer, etc. It also interacts with many drugs.
Smoking screening and cessation assistance have become an indicator of quality somatic care in mental health institutions.
Investigators hypothesise that a consultation in the workplace can help employees to change their smoking habits.
The aims of this study are to assess the effect of a workplace smoking clinic on smokers employed in a mental health institution, and to describe their smoking habits and profiles according to occupational category, with a view to implementing appropriate preventive and treatment measures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility Study of Smoking Cessation for the Staff of a Hospital Center
NCT04635358
Effectiveness of a Smoking Cessation Intervention in a Mental Health Day Hospital
NCT05045326
Effectiveness of a Smoking Cessation Quit Line for Mental Health Patients
NCT03230955
Tabacco Cessation in Hospital Services
NCT07031024
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Routine Nurse Education in Prescribing Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Hospitalized Smokers in a University Hospital
NCT06789536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2010, 23% of nurses and 40% of nursing auxiliaries in France said they smoked every day. In a more recent study on parisian hospitals, the prevalence of daily smoking was observed among 26.8% of nurse auxiliaries, 26.3% of nurses, 16.7% of physiotherapists, 27.6% of health managers and 27% of doctors. Among the 3,659 respondents to a study at the Hospices Civils de Lyon, the smoking rate among paramedics (nurses, nursing auxiliaries, and health managers) was 25.6%. Among doctors, pharmacists and dentists, the proportion of smokers is 17.3%, while it reaches 46% among technical and logistics staff. The same survey also showed that paramedical students are three times more likely to be smokers than medical students, and that night staff are 1.5 times more likely to be smokers, given the same age.
In mental health establishments, smoking is prevalent among both patients and healthcare professionals. Investigators now know that smoking affects mood and sleep. It aggravates all pathologies (somatic and psychological) and predisposes people to more diabetes, chronic bronchitis, cardiovascular disease, cancer, etc. It interacts with many psychotropic and analgesic drugs. Smoking screening and cessation assistance have become a quality of care indicator in mental health institutions.
Investigators hypothesise that easier access to smoking cessation consultations in the workplace will improve uptake of this support and encourage smoker carers to change their smoking habits, and that experimenting with this support will increase smoker carers' confidence in their ability to manage their patients' smoking.
The issue of smoking in patients with psychiatric comorbidity is a major one. Smoking significantly reduces their life expectancy: an average of 25 years less, compared with 10 years for smokers without mental disorders. Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the leading causes of premature death. Smoking also affects their quality of life by increasing their metabolic risk (diabetes), reducing their respiratory capacity (chronic obstructive bronchitis) and increasing their risk of chronic disabling pain (arteritis of the lower limbs). Healthcare professionals are expected to play an active role in the fight against smoking and to act as role models for those receiving care, promoting appropriate lifestyles to maintain good health.
Smoking by health professionals does not appear to be more prevalent at the Centre Hospitalier Alpes-Isère than in the general population: 25.9% compared with 25.5%, but this is still significant and probably contributes to the erroneous representations of smoking in psychiatry.
Today, the recommendations of the Haute Autorité de Santé specify that psychological support and assistance are the basis of treatment. Nicotine substitutes supplement this support if the smoker shows signs of nicotine dependence. For smoker health professionals, the offer of smoking counselling in the workplace is likely to encourage them to use these aids and to succeed.
In previous studies, investigators found cessation rates at 12 months of 33% in an intensive intervention group (NST, intensive advice and outpatient telephone follow-up) compared with 20% in a control group (minimal advice) (RR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.7).
In a study of hospital smoking clinics, 29.5% of patients (schizophrenic patients were excluded) maintained cessation at 1 year: female gender and prematurely interrupted follow-up were significantly associated with the risk of relapse at 1 year.
With regard to smoker healthcare professionals, a meta-analysis published in 2020 of ten studies (6 cohort studies and 4 clinical trials) measured a one-year cessation rate of 21% following the application of pharmacological or behavioural interventions. Hajek et al. showed in a randomised trial that the vaporiser could double the success rate at 1 year compared with treatment with nicotine replacement therapy alone, if accompanied by behavioural support.
Invesigators therefore believe it is possible to achieve a one-year cessation rate of 30% with workplace consultations combining support, nicotine replacement therapy and/or a vapour device where appropriate.
Doctors' smoking status and attitudes towards smoking are known to influence their enthusiasm for advising their patients against smoking.
As the Nagahapitye et al. study made clear: 'It is reasonable to assume that a healthcare professional who is not a smoker or is a former smoker will be more committed and more convincing in spreading messages about smoking and cessation. Health professionals smoking habits are therefore an important factor in the prevention of tobacco-related diseases.
The hypotheses of PSYTaB are :
* To improve cessation and reduction rates among smokers working in mental health,
* To improve the management of their patients' smoking and representations of smoking.
This study may also highlight benefits for the healthcare establishment and society, notably in terms of reduction in sick leave rates.
This study involves no risk for the subject.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
* Prospective
* Non-randomised
* Comparative with historical cohort
* Monocentric
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
consultation tabacco
At the first T0 consultation, the tobacco nurse :
* Carries out a monoxyde carbon measurement, In order to assess the patient's smoking profile and find out their degree of nicotine dependency, what might be holding them back from quitting, what might be motivating them, their psychological state, their fears and their medical history.
* Define a programme for smoking cessation : the planned date for cessation, the treatment chosen, any additional specific therapy or consultations, and the date of the next appointments.
During the 6-month follow-up sessions, the nurse assesses the patient's mood and anxiety, with a view to adapting the treatment if necessary.
At the final consultation at T12 months, the nurse assesses the patient's withdrawal and the effect of the follow-up tobacco consultations.
exhaled carbon monoxyde measurement
At the initial tobacco consultation: measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde. At the tobaccology consultation at 12 months, measurement of the cessation rate: no tobacco smoked in the last 7 days (self-reported), confirmed by a measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde \< 9 ppm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
exhaled carbon monoxyde measurement
At the initial tobacco consultation: measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde. At the tobaccology consultation at 12 months, measurement of the cessation rate: no tobacco smoked in the last 7 days (self-reported), confirmed by a measurement of exhaled carbon monoxyde \< 9 ppm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Health professional
3. Daily smoker of at least 1 cigarette or joint per day and every day
4. Willingness to quit smoking
5. Patient physically able and willing to undertake a carbon monoxyde measurement
6. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
7. Signature of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Occasional (i.e. not daily) smoker or exhaled carbon monoxyde at inclusion \< 9 ppm
3. Resignation, transfer or end of employment contract during the study period (1 year)
4. Unable to undergo study follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons
5. Persons under legal protection or unable to express their consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olivier Jenny, Medical doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital Center Alpes-Isère
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste Grenoble
Grenoble, isere, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A01826-41
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PSYTaB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.