SLND Versus Non-Dissection Following ESD for T1a Stage Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT06979986

Last Updated: 2025-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2027-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study from Fujian Cancer Hospital Thoracic of Surgery Project, numbered as FJCHTOSP-1. Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection (SLD) Versus Non-Dissection Following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for T1a Stage Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a single-center, prospective clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be evaluated for inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and then sign informal consent if desired. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention according to a prepared random tables. Participants in the systematically mediastinal lymph node dissection (SLND) group will receive systematically mediastinal lymph node dissection, while those in the non-SLND group will not receive mediastinal lymph node dissection. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

The sample size are estimated with reference to investigators' previous data, in which the 3-year DFS was 62.7% for patients diagnosed with T1a Stage Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and underwent Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection without SLND. Investigators assumed that if 3-year DFS of patients in SLND group was over 80%, then investigatorswould deem the SLND group to be superior to the non-SLND group. The sample size are estimated to be 102. Therefore, the total number of patients enrolled are designed to be 102.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection

T1a Stage Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma undergo Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be evaluated for inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and then sign informal consent if desired. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention according to a prepared random tables. Participants in the SLND group will receive Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with systematically mediastinal lymph node dissection

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection without Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection

T1a Stage Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma just recieve Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection treatment, not undergo Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection without SLND

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be evaluated for inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and then sign informal consent if desired. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention according to a prepare random tables. Participants in the non-SLND group will just receive Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection treatment, not undergo Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection

Participants will be evaluated for inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and then sign informal consent if desired. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention according to a prepared random tables. Participants in the SLND group will receive Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with systematically mediastinal lymph node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection without SLND

Participants will be evaluated for inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and then sign informal consent if desired. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention according to a prepare random tables. Participants in the non-SLND group will just receive Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection treatment, not undergo Systematically mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical stage T1aN0M0.
* A lesion detected on Endoscopic Ultrasound featured as T1a stage.
* Age 18 to 75.
* Patients who have signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Other than invasive adenocarcinoma by pathological analysis.

* Not complete resected or curative intent.
* Patients who have history of other malignant tumors.
* Patients who have history of thoracic surgery.
* Patients who have received radiation, chemotherapy or other treatments previously.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fujian Cancer Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Weimin Fang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ruirong Lin, Ph.D

Role: CONTACT

0591-62752788

Jiarong Zhang, Ph.D

Role: CONTACT

0591-62752789

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nishihira T, Hirayama K, Mori S. A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Surg. 1998 Jan;175(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00227-4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9445239 (View on PubMed)

Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002 Aug;236(2):177-83. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00005.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12170022 (View on PubMed)

Tong DK, Law S, Kwong DL, Chan KW, Lam AK, Wong KH. Histological regression of squamous esophageal carcinoma assessed by percentage of residual viable cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an important prognostic factor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(8):2184-92. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0995-2. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20217248 (View on PubMed)

Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Extended esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. Arch Surg. 2003 Dec;138(12):1383-9; discussion 1390. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1383.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14662544 (View on PubMed)

Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):225-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00013.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10903602 (View on PubMed)

Hsu PK, Huang CS, Wang BY, Wu YC, Hsu WH. Survival benefits of postoperative chemoradiation for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24612702 (View on PubMed)

Hsu PK, Wang BY, Huang CS, Wu YC, Hsu WH. Prognostic factors for post-recurrence survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with recurrence after resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Apr;15(4):558-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1458-1. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21327531 (View on PubMed)

Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Keswani RN, Chung J, Sherman KL, Knab LM, Posner MC, Bentrem DJ. Treatment trends, risk of lymph node metastasis, and outcomes for localized esophageal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 16;106(7):dju133. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju133. Print 2014 Jul.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25031273 (View on PubMed)

Chen J, Wu S, Zheng X, Pan J, Zhu K, Chen Y, Li J, Liao L, Lin Y, Liao Z. Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection. BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 19;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-110.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25527100 (View on PubMed)

Li H, Yang S, Zhang Y, Xiang J, Chen H. Thoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012 May;105(6):548-52. doi: 10.1002/jso.22148. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22105736 (View on PubMed)

Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005 Jan;189(1):98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.10.001.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15701501 (View on PubMed)

Tabira Y, Kitamura N, Yoshioka M, Tanaka M, Nakano K, Toyota N, Mori T. Significance of three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus based on depth of tumor infiltration, lymph nodal involvement and survival rate. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999 Oct;40(5):737-40.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10597014 (View on PubMed)

Ma GW, Situ DR, Ma QL, Long H, Zhang LJ, Lin P, Rong TH. Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 21;20(47):18022-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25548502 (View on PubMed)

Ye K, Xu JH, Sun YF, Lin JA, Zheng ZG. Characteristics and clinical significance of lymph node metastases near the recurrent laryngeal nerve from thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Genet Mol Res. 2014 Aug 25;13(3):6411-9. doi: 10.4238/2014.August.25.4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25158259 (View on PubMed)

Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H. Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 7;19(9):1424-37. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1424.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23539431 (View on PubMed)

Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Yamana H, Shinozaki K, Toh U, Tanaka Y, Mine T, Kubota M, Shirouzu K, Toyonaga A, Harada H, Ban S, Watanabe M, Toda Y, Tabuchi E, Hayabuchi N, Inutsuka H. Optimum treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2001 Apr;25(4):424-31. doi: 10.1007/s002680020053.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11344392 (View on PubMed)

Katada C, Muto M, Momma K, Arima M, Tajiri H, Kanamaru C, Ooyanagi H, Endo H, Michida T, Hasuike N, Oda I, Fujii T, Saito D. Clinical outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae--a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):779-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966761.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17703385 (View on PubMed)

Moriya H, Ohbu M, Kobayashi N, Tanabe S, Katada N, Futawatari N, Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Okayasu I, Watanabe M. Lymphatic tumor emboli detected by D2-40 immunostaining can more accurately predict lymph-node metastasis. World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):2031-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1143-2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21667194 (View on PubMed)

Yamashina T, Ishihara R, Nagai K, Matsuura N, Matsui F, Ito T, Fujii M, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka N, Takeuchi Y, Higashino K, Uedo N, Iishi H. Long-term outcome and metastatic risk after endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):544-51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.8. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23399555 (View on PubMed)

Tachibana M, Hirahara N, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H. Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal cancer: results of consecutive 100 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):104-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9604-4. Epub 2007 Sep 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17891442 (View on PubMed)

Choi JY, Park YS, Jung HY, Ahn JY, Kim MY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Cho KJ, Kim JH. Feasibility of endoscopic resection in superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):881-9, 889.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.028. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21392755 (View on PubMed)

Eguchi T, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Iwasaki M, Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Umemura S. Histopathological criteria for additional treatment after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal cancer: analysis of 464 surgically resected cases. Mod Pathol. 2006 Mar;19(3):475-80. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800557.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16444191 (View on PubMed)

Kitagawa Y, Ishihara R, Ishikawa H, Ito Y, Oyama T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, Kawachi H, Kuribayashi S, Kono K, Kojima T, Takeuchi H, Tsushima T, Toh Y, Nemoto K, Booka E, Makino T, Matsuda S, Matsubara H, Mano M, Minashi K, Miyazaki T, Muto M, Yamaji T, Yamatsuji T, Yoshida M. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2. Esophagus. 2023 Jul;20(3):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00994-1. Epub 2023 Mar 30. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36995449 (View on PubMed)

Li B, Chen H, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Kong Y, Garfield DH, Li H. Prevalence of lymph node metastases in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23988285 (View on PubMed)

Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Goto O, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Omata M. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov;70(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.044. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19577748 (View on PubMed)

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26808342 (View on PubMed)

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30207593 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FJCHTOSP-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.