Combating HIV Stigma in Healthcare Settings: A Standardized Patient Approach

NCT ID: NCT06975176

Last Updated: 2025-07-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-07

Study Completion Date

2028-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a training program to reduce intersectional stigma faced by sexual minorities and people living with HIV (PLWH) in healthcare settings. The study participants are medical providers (i.e. physicians) specializing in sexual health medicine in China.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Consistent data highlight the central role of stigma in limiting uptake of HIV related testing, treatment, and care. This is particularly true for gay, bisexual, and other MSM who have the lowest rates of engagement with the healthcare system despite bearing the highest HIV incidence burden. Particularly for MSM seeking HIV testing services, enacted stigma-overt acts of discrimination and hostility directed at a person because of their perceived stigmatized status -both on account of their same-sex behaviors (i.e. sexuality stigma or homophobia) and the perception of their elevated HIV risk (HIV stigma) is all too common. Trained standardized patients (SP) will present a standardized case to providers.

SPs will present clinically standardized case scenarios, but the HIV status and sexual orientation of each case will be randomly varied. Stigma will be evaluated by comparing the quality of care that SPs experience during provider visits. Results of the baseline visit will inform the development of a stigma reduction training program for provider participants employed at clinics randomized to the treatment arm. The overall structure consists of didactic content as well as experiential learning using simulation-and-feedback sessions with trained SPs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hiv

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stigma Reduction Intervention

A Stigma Reduction Intervention curriculum developed using data generated from Stage 1 of the study.

For stage 2/intervention stage, participants who are providers and randomized to the "Stigma Reduction Intervention" arm through clinic-level randomization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stigma reduction intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Care providers will complete the Stigma Reduction Intervention curriculum. The intervention is a multi-day stigma reduction training program for providers.

Content design is greatly informed by materials developed in our pilot R34 study, and which may be modified prior to the intervention if the team gains new insights from the baseline round of unannounced visits and each of the two CABs. Briefly, the intervention consists of both didactic and experiential learning components. Didactic sessions include instruction on syphilis epidemiology, clinical management, and public health significance. Experiential sessions include discussion sessions that are facilitated by pre-recorded videos, followed by role play with trained SPs.

Control

For stage 2/intervention stage, participants who are providers and randomized to the "Control" arm through clinic-level randomization

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stigma reduction intervention

Care providers will complete the Stigma Reduction Intervention curriculum. The intervention is a multi-day stigma reduction training program for providers.

Content design is greatly informed by materials developed in our pilot R34 study, and which may be modified prior to the intervention if the team gains new insights from the baseline round of unannounced visits and each of the two CABs. Briefly, the intervention consists of both didactic and experiential learning components. Didactic sessions include instruction on syphilis epidemiology, clinical management, and public health significance. Experiential sessions include discussion sessions that are facilitated by pre-recorded videos, followed by role play with trained SPs.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Eligible facilities are those with

* formal government accreditation as a medical center (a basic tenet of all public hospitals in China); and
* possession of an accredited on-site laboratory with capacity to provide enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay testing for HIV, treponemal (e.g. Treponema pallidum particle agglutination) and non-treponemal tests (e.g. rapid plasma regain) for syphilis. Within eligible and consenting facilities, eligible providers are those who are licensed at the time of the study to practice STD care in China.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kumi Smith, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sophie Watson

Role: CONTACT

612-301-3051

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sophie Watson

Role: primary

612-301-3051

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HIV Stigma

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ResIlience-based Stigma REdUction Program ("Rise-up")
NCT05174936 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA