EMBRACE Tremor BiFUS

NCT ID: NCT06974916

Last Updated: 2026-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-22

Study Completion Date

2028-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a post-market (Phase IV) randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study with the aim to determine the added value of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment combined with local standard medical treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In patients who have undergone previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy for Essential Tremor, the aim of this trial is to determine the effect of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment. The effect will be measured on tremor reduction, functional impairment, disease-specific quality of life, adverse events and patient-perception of the overall treatment result in patients eligible for a staged bilateral Exablate procedure.

Patients assigned to the treatment arm will receive staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy. Patients assigned to control group will remain under local standard medical treatment.

The primary efficacy study objective is to demonstrate that Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment reduces tremor, as measured by Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) (0-28) score, to a higher extent than those remaining on previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy at 6 months.

The primary safety study objective is to assess the adverse events (AEs) of Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment in comparison to those remaining on unilateral treatment (control group) plus medical treatment, including AE type, incidence, severity and duration at 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Tremor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Subjects will be videotaped while undergoing a standardized total CRST assessment at baseline and at the 6-month visit (use a standardized video-protocol). Subjects will wear head covers so that the investigator cannot tell whether the patient has received hair shaving to prepare for the FUS-intervention. Video-recordings will be assessed by two blinded core reviewers (i.e., certified Movement Disorder Neurologists, selected by the study Steering Committee (SC) for this task).

The video recordings are played in random order with respect to patients and study time points to minimize reviewer bias.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exablate Arm

Subjects will receive staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy in ET patients

Control Arm

Subjects will continue with their standard of care treatment for 6 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local standard medical treatment after previous Exablate unilateral thalamotomy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Local standard medical treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy

Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy in ET patients

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local standard medical treatment after previous Exablate unilateral thalamotomy.

Local standard medical treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women with an age of 18 years or older.
2. Willing to participate in the study (i.e., signed ICF). (Willing to be randomized).
3. Patient is able to undergo a high-resolution Computerized Tomography (CT) scan.
4. Patient is able to fit into MRI unit and comply with all contraindications for the specific magnetic resonance (MR) system including and limited to contrast medium should there be needed.
5. The thalamus, sub-thalamus and the pallidum must be apparent on MR imaging.
6. Patient is able to communicate sensations to the physician during the procedure; Procedure does not require general anesthesia.
7. Patient must be able to use the Stop Sonication button freely.
8. Patient willing to have their head shaved prior to the actual treatment.
9. Patient has no history for claustrophobia which is not responding to medications.
10. ET patients who are eligible for second side staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy treatment. Time since first intervention is at least 9 months.
11. Available tremor assessment prior to the unilateral Exablate thalamotomy.
12. Patients randomized to the study, irrespective of group allocation should be willing and able to remain in the study for at least 6 months and able to complete the required assessments.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject experienced any non-transient neurological event or worsening following the previous Exablate procedure.
2. Patients with MRI related contraindications (e.g. presence of metallic implants incompatibility with MRI, severe claustrophobia, reaction to contrast medium).
3. Patients in whom it is not possible to avoid energy absorbing structures or sensitive tissues (e.g., skull implants, surgical clips, shunts, electrodes, dura patch, skull patch, electrodes, etc.) from the path of the ultrasound beam.
4. Patients with concurrent active infections disease and/or severe allergies with fever.
5. Patients that have been diagnosed with brain tumors or a vascular anomaly.
6. Patients with a history of seizures, brain hemorrhages, stroke within the past year, or any coagulopathy.
7. Patients under anticoagulants and/or anti-platelets drugs known to increase bleeding risk within the duration defined by the half-life of the specific drugs.
8. Patient that has been given any contrast agent (e.g., CT, MRI), within 24 hours before treatment
9. Severe unstable hypertension that cannot be controlled by medications (diastolic Blood Pressure \> 100 on medication).
10. Patients with unstable cardiac status.
11. Patients exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse.
12. Cerebrovascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months).
13. Patients with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding.
14. Imaging shows abnormal finding in CT or/and MRI (e.g., brain tumor, brain vascular malformation, shunt, etc.).
15. Patient has physical subscale score ≥ 16.5 on the Dysphagia Handicap Index or has been diagnosed with dysphagia.
16. Patient with cognitive impairment.
17. Patient with clinically significant abnormal speech function as determined by a speech pathologist.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

InSightec

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Günther Deuschl

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel (UKSH)

Steffen Paschen

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel (UKSH)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Turku University Hospital

Turku, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel (UKSH)

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

Milan, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

HM CINAC- Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur

Móstoles, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland Germany Italy Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pascalle Reiters

Role: CONTACT

+31 653726776

Elisa Cerutti

Role: CONTACT

+39 3459182413

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Valtteri Kaasinen

Role: primary

Steffen Paschen

Role: primary

Roberto Eleopra

Role: primary

Dolores Vilas Rolán

Role: primary

Raul Martinez Fernandez

Role: primary

Maria Cruz Rodriguez Oroz

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ET006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bilateral Essential Tremor Treatment With Gamma Knife
NCT04748640 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3