Octreotide vs. Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Flow Modulation in Living Donor Liver Transplants (SCALOP Trial)

NCT ID: NCT06974344

Last Updated: 2025-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2030-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two treatments for regulating blood flow in small liver grafts during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is octreotide (a medication) as effective or better than splenic artery ligation (surgery) in reducing complications after transplantation?
* Which treatment better controls blood flow while causing fewer side effects?

Researchers will compare octreotide (given through an IV) to splenic artery ligation (performed during surgery) to see which approach works best for patients receiving small liver grafts.

Participants will:

* Be randomly assigned to receive either octreotide or splenic artery ligation during their transplant surgery
* Have their liver blood flow monitored closely during and after surgery

Be followed for 90 days and 1 year to track complications, hospital stay, recovery, and survival.

This study may help doctors choose safer, more effective treatments for patients needing small liver grafts.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled trial (SCALOP-RCT) investigates two strategies for managing portal hyperperfusion in adults receiving small living donor liver transplants (graft-to-recipient weight ratio \<0.80%). Small grafts are prone to injury from high venous portal and low hepatic artery flow, leading to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), a major cause of transplant failure.

Interventions Compared

* Octreotide: A somatostatic analogue that reduces portal venous flow and increased hepatic artery flow to the liver by constricting blood vessels, given continuously through an IV during and after surgery.
* Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL): A surgical procedure that ties off the artery supplying the spleen, indirectly lowering portal venous flow.

Study Design

* Randomization: Participants are assigned 1:1 to octreotide or SAL during transplant surgery.
* Rescue Protocol: If portal venous flow remains too high after the initial treatment, patients may switch to the alternative therapy (crossover).
* Blinding: Surgeons know the treatment, but outcome assessors and data analysts do not.

Key Assessments

* Primary: Total complication burden at 90 days (Comprehensive Complication Index(R) (CCI(R)).
* Secondary: Blood flow measurements, early liver function, hospital stay, survival, and quality of life.
* Rationale: Current approaches vary widely, with no consensus on whether medications or surgery work better. This trial will provide evidence to standardize care, potentially improving graft survival and expanding donor options.
* Population: 80 adults (18-70 years) undergoing LDLT at a single tertiary center.
* Innovation: First head-to-head comparison of these strategies with rigorous hemodynamic monitoring and crossover rescue design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Small-for-Size Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a parallel-group, randomized, single-blind trial comparing octreotide infusion versus splenic artery ligation for portal flow modulation in living donor liver transplantation. While participants are initially assigned to one treatment arm, crossover to the alternative therapy is permitted as rescue treatment if hemodynamic targets are not met. Outcome assessors will remain blinded to the original allocation throughout follow-up.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Biostatistician

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Octreotide Infusion Arm

Continuous intravenous octreotide (1 mcg/kg/hr) initiated at liver graft reperfusion and continued postoperatively until hemodynamic stability is achieved.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Octreotide (drug)

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous intravenous octreotide acetate infusion initiated at hepatic reperfusion during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The initial dose is 1 mcg/kg/hr, titrated intraoperatively based on portal venous flow (PVF) and hepatic artery flow / resistive index (RI) measurements. The infusion continues postoperatively in the ICU until stable graft hemodynamics are achieved (target PVF \<5 mL/min/g and presence of diastolic hepatic arterial flow). Dose adjustments are permitted for efficacy or safety concerns, with all modifications documented. The intervention is administered via central venous access using standard infusion protocols

Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL) Arm

Intraoperative ligation of the splenic artery using non-absorbable suture near its origin.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intraoperative ligation of the splenic artery performed during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using non-absorbable suture material (e.g., polypropylene). The ligation is typically placed near the splenic artery origin for maximal portal flow modulation, with exact positioning determined by surgeon assessment of vascular anatomy and intraoperative hemodynamics (targeting portal venous flow \<5 mL/min/g). The procedure is performed under direct visualization during the transplant operation, with post-ligation Doppler ultrasound confirmation of hemodynamic response within 60 minutes of biliary anastomosis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Octreotide (drug)

Continuous intravenous octreotide acetate infusion initiated at hepatic reperfusion during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The initial dose is 1 mcg/kg/hr, titrated intraoperatively based on portal venous flow (PVF) and hepatic artery flow / resistive index (RI) measurements. The infusion continues postoperatively in the ICU until stable graft hemodynamics are achieved (target PVF \<5 mL/min/g and presence of diastolic hepatic arterial flow). Dose adjustments are permitted for efficacy or safety concerns, with all modifications documented. The intervention is administered via central venous access using standard infusion protocols

Intervention Type DRUG

Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL)

Intraoperative ligation of the splenic artery performed during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using non-absorbable suture material (e.g., polypropylene). The ligation is typically placed near the splenic artery origin for maximal portal flow modulation, with exact positioning determined by surgeon assessment of vascular anatomy and intraoperative hemodynamics (targeting portal venous flow \<5 mL/min/g). The procedure is performed under direct visualization during the transplant operation, with post-ligation Doppler ultrasound confirmation of hemodynamic response within 60 minutes of biliary anastomosis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Octreotide acetate SandostatinĀ® Somatostatin analogue

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≄ 18 and \<70 years
2. Male and female genders
3. Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplant (LDLT)
4. All indications
5. Receiving a small-for-size graft requiring portal flow modulation
6. Informed consent provided.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation (DDLT)
2. Dual LDLT or dual LDLT/DDLT
3. Pregnancy
4. Known allergy to Octreotide / Somatostatin analogue
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dieter C. Broering, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Dimitri A. Raptis, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Massimo Malago, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dieter C. Broering, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+966 11 464 7272

Dimitri A. Raptis, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+966530330809

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dieter C. Broering, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+966 11 464 7272

Dimitri A. Raptis, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: backup

+966530330809

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RAC2241241

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lanreotide as Treatment of Polycystic Livers
NCT00565097 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Effects of Somatostatin on Liver in ADPKD
NCT02119052 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3