Safety and Efficacy of Awake Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Modified Pericardial Window in Recurrent Pericardial Effusion at Mid Term Result

NCT ID: NCT06972836

Last Updated: 2025-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-20

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

this study compare two surgical techniues at the same time two methods of anathesia with assisstance of thoracoscope for cases of repeated collection of fluid in pericardial sac and observation the result of the two techniques on the operated patients from 3 to 6 months

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

this study compare two thoracoscopic techniues awake modified pericardial window and pericardial window under general anasethia for cases of repeated collection of fluid in pericardial sac and observation the result of the two techniques on the operated patients from 3 to 6 months

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Awake Thoracoscope Pericardial Effusion Pericadiopleural Window

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Awake modified pericardial window

H) shaped lines done by diathemy hoke above phrenic nerve then the upper and lower pericardial flabs reflelected outward in upper and lower directions respectively then 3 large clips applied on each angle of the reflected pericardial anlgles then heavy non absorbable suture is taken from the centre of the free reflected edge to adjacent upper and lower pericardium

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

modified pericardial window

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

(H) shaped lines done by diathemy hoke above phrenic nerve then the upper and lower pericardial flabs reflelected outward in upper and lower directions respectively then 3 large clips applied on each angle of the reflected pericardial anlgles then heavy non absorbable suture is taken from the centre of the free reflected edge to adjacent upper and lower pericardium

General traditional pericardial window

A portion of pericardium (2 cm diameter) was resected anterior to the phrenic nerve by diathermy hook

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

traditional pericardial window

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A portion of pericardium (2 cm diameter) was resected anterior to the phrenic nerve by diathermy hook

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

modified pericardial window

(H) shaped lines done by diathemy hoke above phrenic nerve then the upper and lower pericardial flabs reflelected outward in upper and lower directions respectively then 3 large clips applied on each angle of the reflected pericardial anlgles then heavy non absorbable suture is taken from the centre of the free reflected edge to adjacent upper and lower pericardium

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

traditional pericardial window

A portion of pericardium (2 cm diameter) was resected anterior to the phrenic nerve by diathermy hook

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who presented with recurrent massive pericardial effusion based on clinical, radiological evidence by Echo and C.T. chest

Exclusion Criteria

* hemodynamically unstable patients
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amr Elsayed Tawfek Ibrahim

assisstant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amr Tawfek, as prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

cardiothoracic surgery department-faculty of medecine-zagazig univeristy-Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amr El Sayed Tawfek

Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt

Site Status

cardiothorathic surgery department -faculty of medecine-zagazig univeristy- Egypt

Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZU-IRB # 739-15-10-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.