Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy VS Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Middle Stomach

NCT ID: NCT06970327

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

95 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With the development of laparoscopic technology, the surgical treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) has shifted towards minimally invasive, precise, and function-preserving strategies. Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (TLPPG) are minimally invasive procedures. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence to directly compare their efficacies.

This study focuses on two fully laparoscopic techniques, TLDG and TLPPG, to address two key objectives: (1) whether TLPPG can avoid the long-term functional sequelae of TLDG while ensuring oncological safety, including complications (delayed gastric emptying, reflux, and dumping syndrome), postoperative quality of life (assessed via the PGSAS-37 scale), and survival outcomes; and (2) the balance between complications and survival in function-preserving surgery. The findings aim to provide critical technical parameters for individualized surgical decision-making in EGC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the continuous advancement and innovation of laparoscopic technology, the surgical treatment paradigm for early gastric cancer (EGC) is undergoing a profound transformation, gradually evolving towards a more minimally invasive, precise, and function-preserving approach. In this context, Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (TLDG) and Totally Laparoscopic Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy (TLPPG) have emerged as two highly representative minimally invasive surgical procedures. Characterized by smaller incisions, reduced trauma, and relatively faster postoperative recovery, they have garnered extensive attention in the field of EGC treatment. However, despite their application in clinical practice, there is currently a lack of comprehensive and systematic evidence-based medical data that can directly and thoroughly compare their therapeutic effects.

This study will focus on these two advanced laparoscopic surgical techniques, TLDG and TLPPG, and conduct in-depth exploration around two core objectives. Firstly, it will evaluate whether TLPPG can effectively avoid the long-term functional sequelae potentially caused by TLDG while ensuring oncological safety. These sequelae include common complications such as delayed gastric emptying, reflux, and dumping syndrome. Additionally, the study will comprehensively assess patients' postoperative quality of life using the PGSAS-37 scale and further analyze the impact of the two surgical procedures on patients' survival outcomes. Secondly, it will delve into how to achieve the optimal balance between complication control and patients' survival benefits in function-preserving surgeries. Through rigorous data analysis and scientific demonstration, this study aims to provide crucial technical parameters and reliable decision-making bases for the formulation of personalized surgical plans for EGC patients, thereby promoting the development of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer towards a more precise and efficient direction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastrectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TLPPG

Totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy

No interventions assigned to this group

TLDG

Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preoperative diagnosis of early gastric adenocarcinoma (invasion limited to the mucosa or submucosa) confirmed by tissue biopsy, abdominal enhanced CT, and endoscopic ultrasound;
* Tumor located in the gastric body or distal stomach, \>4 cm from the pylorus;
* Ineligible for endoscopic mucosal dissection or elected for surgical treatment by family;
* Complete clinical and pathological data.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe anemia, coagulation disorders, or gastric outlet obstruction;
* History of gastric or upper abdominal surgery;
* Concurrent malignant tumors, ascites, edema, or pleural effusion;
* Gastric ulcers, polyps, or intestinal metaplasia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Changzhi Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HeJi hospital affiliated ChangZhi medical college

Changzhi, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Grant No. 2023MX009

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ChangzhiMC202307

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Uncut Roux-en-Y vs Roux-en-Y
NCT03349398 UNKNOWN NA