Comparison of Outcomes Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Conventional Phacoemulsification in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Patients With Cataracts
NCT ID: NCT06966167
Last Updated: 2025-06-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-01-01
2030-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does FLACS lead to better preservation of corneal endothelial cells compared to CPS in patients with moderate to severe FECD? How do visual outcomes and corneal transparency compare between FLACS and CPS in this patient population?
Comparison Group:
Researchers will compare patients undergoing FLACS with those undergoing CPS to evaluate differences in endothelial cell loss, corneal thickness, visual acuity, and corneal transparency.
Participants:
Adults aged 40 years and older diagnosed with moderate to severe FECD (endothelial cell density \<1500 cells/mm²).
Patients scheduled for cataract surgery at participating centers.
Participants will undergo:
Preoperative evaluations, including visual acuity tests, corneal endothelial cell density assessment (central and five peripheral zones), corneal thickness, and corneal densitometry.
Surgical intervention with either FLACS or CPS. Postoperative follow-ups at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, including assessments of endothelial cell density, visual acuity, and corneal thickness.
This study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing surgical strategies in high-risk patients with FECD and cataracts.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery to Conventional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery
NCT02096627
Study on the Surgical Strategy of Corneal Endothelial Protection for Hard Nuclear Cataract Patients
NCT06991374
Combined Vitrectomy and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery
NCT05588037
Risk Assessment for Progression to DMEK Following Cataract Surgery in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
NCT04072029
Improved Operation of Low Intraocular Pressure in Phacoemulsification for Patients With High Myopia Complicated With Cataract
NCT05201677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This observational, prospective, multi-center controlled study aims to compare the mid- to long-term efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) in patients with moderate to severe FECD undergoing cataract extraction. The study seeks to determine which technique better preserves corneal endothelial integrity and maintains visual function, providing valuable insights into surgical decision-making for this high-risk patient population.
Study Objectives The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss and corneal thickness changes between FLACS and CPS in patients with moderate to severe FECD undergoing cataract surgery.
The secondary objectives include:
Assessing differences in postoperative visual acuity, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).
Comparing corneal densitometry and transparency changes between the two surgical techniques.
Evaluating postoperative corneal edema and potential complications related to endothelial decompensation.
Study Design Type: Prospective, observational, multi-center, controlled study Study Sites: Three ophthalmology centers with similar surgical and imaging equipment Participants: 120 eyes from 120 patients (FLACS group: 80 eyes; CPS group: 40 eyes)
Grouping: Patients will be assigned to either FLACS or CPS based on clinical indications rather than randomization. Subgroup analyses will be conducted based on:
Age (\>70 years vs. ≤70 years) Preoperative endothelial cell density (\<1000 cells/mm² vs. ≥1000 cells/mm²) Cataract nuclear grading (\>grade 3 vs. ≤grade 3) Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients scheduled for cataract surgery Age ≥40 years Diagnosed with moderate to severe FECD (endothelial cell density \<1500 cells/mm²)
Exclusion Criteria:
History of prior intraocular surgery Presence of ocular conditions other than FECD and cataracts (e.g., severe dry eye, corneal scarring, keratoconus, uveitis, uncontrolled glaucoma, vitreoretinal disease) Requirement for additional intraocular procedures during the study period (excluding Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy)
Discontinuation Criteria:
Failure to complete scheduled follow-up visits Serious adverse events (e.g., vision-threatening endophthalmitis) Participant withdrawal from the study Interventions \& Assessments
Preoperative Evaluation:
Comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including visual acuity testing (UDVA, CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and refraction Biometric assessment using IOLMaster Corneal endothelial cell density measurement using specular microscopy and confocal microscopy (central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal zones) Corneal pachymetry and densitometry evaluation using Pentacam
Surgical Interventions:
FLACS Group: Patients will undergo femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, which includes laser-assisted corneal incisions, capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation, followed by phacoemulsification.
CPS Group: Patients will undergo conventional phacoemulsification with manual capsulorhexis and lens nucleus fragmentation using ultrasound energy.
Postoperative Follow-Up Schedule:
Patients will be followed up at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. At each follow-up visit, the following assessments will be performed:
Visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA) Intraocular pressure measurement Corneal endothelial assessment using specular and confocal microscopy Corneal pachymetry and densitometry using Pentacam Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes:
Change in central corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) from baseline to postoperative time points Change in corneal thickness from baseline to postoperative time points
Secondary Outcomes:
Change in corneal densitometry (central, superior, inferior, nasal, temporal zones) Postoperative visual acuity outcomes (UDVA, CDVA) Rate of corneal edema and decompensation Incidence of surgical complications (e.g., intraoperative endothelial damage, postoperative corneal haze) Statistical Analysis Continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using t-tests or ANOVA.
Categorical variables will be analyzed using Chi-square tests. Non-normally distributed data will be evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Longitudinal changes will be assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman's test.
Pearson correlation analysis will be used to evaluate relationships between variables.
A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations This study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and national ethical guidelines. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Patient confidentiality will be maintained through anonymized data collection and storage. The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee.
Significance of the Study This study will provide critical evidence on the optimal surgical approach for cataract patients with FECD, guiding clinicians in making evidence-based surgical decisions to improve visual outcomes and reduce endothelial cell loss in this vulnerable population. It may also contribute to refining surgical techniques and identifying best practices for preserving corneal endothelial health during cataract surgery in patients with pre-existing endothelial dysfunction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS)
No interventions assigned to this group
femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥40 years
* Diagnosed with moderate to severe FECD (endothelial cell density \<1500 cells/mm²)
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of ocular conditions other than FECD and cataracts (e.g., severe dry eye, corneal scarring, keratoconus, uveitis, uncontrolled glaucoma, vitreoretinal disease)
* Requirement for additional intraocular procedures during the study period (excluding Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy)
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jin Yang
Chief Physician
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eye and ENT hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lupardi E, Moramarco A, Cassini F, Febbraro S, Savini G, Fontana L. Corneal densitometry measurements comparison between anterior segment OCT and scheimpflug imaging. Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 25;44(1):392. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03309-0.
Aiello F, Gallo Afflitto G, Ceccarelli F, Cesareo M, Nucci C. Global Prevalence of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) in Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 14;2022:3091695. doi: 10.1155/2022/3091695. eCollection 2022.
Ali M, Cho K, Srikumaran D. Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):691-704. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00637-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Mar;38(3):779-82.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Fuchs FLACS vs CPS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.