Comparison of Outcomes Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Conventional Phacoemulsification in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Patients With Cataracts

NCT ID: NCT06966167

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2030-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to compare the mid- to long-term efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) in patients with moderate to severe Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) complicated by cataracts.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does FLACS lead to better preservation of corneal endothelial cells compared to CPS in patients with moderate to severe FECD? How do visual outcomes and corneal transparency compare between FLACS and CPS in this patient population?

Comparison Group:

Researchers will compare patients undergoing FLACS with those undergoing CPS to evaluate differences in endothelial cell loss, corneal thickness, visual acuity, and corneal transparency.

Participants:

Adults aged 40 years and older diagnosed with moderate to severe FECD (endothelial cell density \<1500 cells/mm²).

Patients scheduled for cataract surgery at participating centers.

Participants will undergo:

Preoperative evaluations, including visual acuity tests, corneal endothelial cell density assessment (central and five peripheral zones), corneal thickness, and corneal densitometry.

Surgical intervention with either FLACS or CPS. Postoperative follow-ups at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, including assessments of endothelial cell density, visual acuity, and corneal thickness.

This study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing surgical strategies in high-risk patients with FECD and cataracts.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is a progressive, bilateral corneal disorder characterized by endothelial cell loss, Descemet's membrane thickening, and corneal edema, leading to visual impairment. Patients with moderate to severe FECD are particularly vulnerable to corneal decompensation following cataract surgery due to their compromised endothelial function. As cataract surgery is a common necessity in this patient population, selecting an appropriate surgical technique that minimizes endothelial cell damage is crucial to ensuring optimal postoperative outcomes.

This observational, prospective, multi-center controlled study aims to compare the mid- to long-term efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) in patients with moderate to severe FECD undergoing cataract extraction. The study seeks to determine which technique better preserves corneal endothelial integrity and maintains visual function, providing valuable insights into surgical decision-making for this high-risk patient population.

Study Objectives The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss and corneal thickness changes between FLACS and CPS in patients with moderate to severe FECD undergoing cataract surgery.

The secondary objectives include:

Assessing differences in postoperative visual acuity, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).

Comparing corneal densitometry and transparency changes between the two surgical techniques.

Evaluating postoperative corneal edema and potential complications related to endothelial decompensation.

Study Design Type: Prospective, observational, multi-center, controlled study Study Sites: Three ophthalmology centers with similar surgical and imaging equipment Participants: 120 eyes from 120 patients (FLACS group: 80 eyes; CPS group: 40 eyes)

Grouping: Patients will be assigned to either FLACS or CPS based on clinical indications rather than randomization. Subgroup analyses will be conducted based on:

Age (\>70 years vs. ≤70 years) Preoperative endothelial cell density (\<1000 cells/mm² vs. ≥1000 cells/mm²) Cataract nuclear grading (\>grade 3 vs. ≤grade 3) Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients scheduled for cataract surgery Age ≥40 years Diagnosed with moderate to severe FECD (endothelial cell density \<1500 cells/mm²)

Exclusion Criteria:

History of prior intraocular surgery Presence of ocular conditions other than FECD and cataracts (e.g., severe dry eye, corneal scarring, keratoconus, uveitis, uncontrolled glaucoma, vitreoretinal disease) Requirement for additional intraocular procedures during the study period (excluding Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy)

Discontinuation Criteria:

Failure to complete scheduled follow-up visits Serious adverse events (e.g., vision-threatening endophthalmitis) Participant withdrawal from the study Interventions \& Assessments

Preoperative Evaluation:

Comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including visual acuity testing (UDVA, CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and refraction Biometric assessment using IOLMaster Corneal endothelial cell density measurement using specular microscopy and confocal microscopy (central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal zones) Corneal pachymetry and densitometry evaluation using Pentacam

Surgical Interventions:

FLACS Group: Patients will undergo femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, which includes laser-assisted corneal incisions, capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation, followed by phacoemulsification.

CPS Group: Patients will undergo conventional phacoemulsification with manual capsulorhexis and lens nucleus fragmentation using ultrasound energy.

Postoperative Follow-Up Schedule:

Patients will be followed up at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. At each follow-up visit, the following assessments will be performed:

Visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA) Intraocular pressure measurement Corneal endothelial assessment using specular and confocal microscopy Corneal pachymetry and densitometry using Pentacam Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes:

Change in central corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) from baseline to postoperative time points Change in corneal thickness from baseline to postoperative time points

Secondary Outcomes:

Change in corneal densitometry (central, superior, inferior, nasal, temporal zones) Postoperative visual acuity outcomes (UDVA, CDVA) Rate of corneal edema and decompensation Incidence of surgical complications (e.g., intraoperative endothelial damage, postoperative corneal haze) Statistical Analysis Continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using t-tests or ANOVA.

Categorical variables will be analyzed using Chi-square tests. Non-normally distributed data will be evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Longitudinal changes will be assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman's test.

Pearson correlation analysis will be used to evaluate relationships between variables.

A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Ethical Considerations This study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and national ethical guidelines. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Patient confidentiality will be maintained through anonymized data collection and storage. The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Significance of the Study This study will provide critical evidence on the optimal surgical approach for cataract patients with FECD, guiding clinicians in making evidence-based surgical decisions to improve visual outcomes and reduce endothelial cell loss in this vulnerable population. It may also contribute to refining surgical techniques and identifying best practices for preserving corneal endothelial health during cataract surgery in patients with pre-existing endothelial dysfunction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS)

No interventions assigned to this group

femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for cataract surgery
* Age ≥40 years
* Diagnosed with moderate to severe FECD (endothelial cell density \<1500 cells/mm²)

Exclusion Criteria

* History of prior intraocular surgery
* Presence of ocular conditions other than FECD and cataracts (e.g., severe dry eye, corneal scarring, keratoconus, uveitis, uncontrolled glaucoma, vitreoretinal disease)
* Requirement for additional intraocular procedures during the study period (excluding Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy)
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jin Yang

Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eye and ENT hospital of Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jin Yang

Role: CONTACT

+86 021-64377134

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Role: primary

15088920668

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lupardi E, Moramarco A, Cassini F, Febbraro S, Savini G, Fontana L. Corneal densitometry measurements comparison between anterior segment OCT and scheimpflug imaging. Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 25;44(1):392. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03309-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39320570 (View on PubMed)

Aiello F, Gallo Afflitto G, Ceccarelli F, Cesareo M, Nucci C. Global Prevalence of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) in Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 14;2022:3091695. doi: 10.1155/2022/3091695. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35462618 (View on PubMed)

Ali M, Cho K, Srikumaran D. Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):691-704. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00637-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36637659 (View on PubMed)

Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Mar;38(3):779-82.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9071233 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Fuchs FLACS vs CPS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fuchs' Torsional Phaco Study
NCT00781027 COMPLETED PHASE4