The Effect of Hydrodynamic Parameters on Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Phacoemulsification

NCT ID: NCT00370955

Last Updated: 2009-12-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2007-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two surgical techniques (high vacuum and low vacuum) on corneal endothelium after phacoemulsification.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients aged 50 to 70 years old with moderate lens opacities (nuclear sclerosis of 3+) were included. The exclusion criteria were: 1-previous corneal pathology (dystrophic or degenerative such as Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or advanced trachoma), 2- pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), 3- history of intra ocular surgery, 4- glaucoma or ocular hypertension, 5- eyes with a history of anterior uveitis, 6- diabetes mellitus, 7- anterior chamber depth (ACD) less than 2.5 mm or more than 4 mm, 8- axial length less than 21 mm or more than 25 mm, 9- density of endothelial cells less than 1500 cells per mm2, 10- polymegatism (CV \> 0.4), 11- keratometric astigmatism more than 1.5 Diopters (D), 12- history of contact lens usage, 13- Intra-operative complications (posterior capsule rupture with or without vitreous loss), 14- postoperative uveitis, 15- postoperative surgical wound leakage, 16- deep-set eye, and 17- size of dilated pupil less than 6 mm. Nucleus density was evaluated using the LOCS III classification system Patients were divided in 2 groups randomly: Group 1 included those candidates for phacoemulsification using high hydrodynamic parameter: 400 mmHg vacuum and 40 ml/min flow rate (high vacuum technique) whereas group 2 consisted of patients who underwent phacoemulsification using low hydrodynamic parameters: 200 mmHg vacuum and 20 ml/min flow rate (low vacuum technique). All surgeries were performed by one surgeon using stop and chop technique with sovereign (white star technology) (AMO, USA). During sculpting stage, vacuum was 40mmHg and flow rate is 20ml/min, in both groups. Irrigation aspiration of cortical material and viscoelastic were bimanually and semi automatically performed with flow rate of 30ml/min.

Total ultrasound power and total volume of BSS in both groups were measured. Pachymetry, endothelial cell density, polymegathism, before and 1, 6 and 12 weeks after intervention were also evaluated. Statistically analysis of data included univariate (student t-test and x2) and multivariate (regression model) analysis of postoperative results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Phacoemulsification Corneal endothelial cell loss Hydrodynamic parameters Total ultrasound energy Total infused fluids

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High vacuum group

Those patients who underwent phacoemulsification using high hydrodynamic parameter: 400 mmHg vacuum and 40 ml/min flow rate.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

phacoemulsification using either high vacuum or low vacuum techniques

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All surgeries were performed using Sovereign phacoemulsification system (AMO) using Whitestar technology.

Low vacuum group

Patients who underwent phacoemulsification using low hydrodynamic parameters: 200 mmHg vacuum and 20 ml/min flow rate.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

phacoemulsification using either high vacuum or low vacuum techniques

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All surgeries were performed using Sovereign phacoemulsification system (AMO) using Whitestar technology.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

phacoemulsification using either high vacuum or low vacuum techniques

All surgeries were performed using Sovereign phacoemulsification system (AMO) using Whitestar technology.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

stop and chop technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Moderate lens opacity (Nuclear sclerosis 3+)
* Age between 50 to 70 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous corneal pathology (dystrophic or degenerative such as Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or advanced trachoma),
* Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX),
* History of intra ocular surgery,
* Glaucoma or ocular hypertension,
* Eyes with a history of anterior uveitis,
* Diabetes mellitus,
* Anterior chamber depth (ACD) less than 2.5 mm or more than 4 mm,
* Axial length less than 21 mm or more than 25 mm,
* Density of endothelial cells less than 1500 cells per mm2,
* Polymegatism (CV \> 0.4),
* Keratometric astigmatism more than 1.5 Diopters (D),
* History of contact lens usage,
* Intra-operative complications (posterior capsule rupture with or without vitreous loss),
* Postoperative uveitis,
* Postoperative surgical wound leakage,
* Deep-set eye, and 17- size of dilated pupil less than 6 mm.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shaheed Beheshti Medical University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alireza Baradaran Raffiee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ophthalmic Research Center of Shaheed Beheshti Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alireza Baradaran Raffiee

Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iran

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8527

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id