Buccal Fat for Transoral Robotic Lateral Oropharyngectomy Defects to and Postoperative Pain

NCT ID: NCT06965738

Last Updated: 2025-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2027-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the pain intensity during rest and swallowing in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery for tonsil lesions with and without buccal fat reconstruction. The main question it aims to answer is: does buccal fat after transoral robotic surgery reduce pain after surgery? Additional questions to be explored include if there is a difference in swallowing, complication rates, pain medication usage, and feeding tube usage. Participants will be asked to rate their pain and swallowing on a visual analogue scale after surgery. The group will be compared compared to a control group that undergoes transoral robotic surgery without buccal fat reconstruction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancers have transformed how oropharyngeal cancers are managed, allowing for minimally invasive surgical access to remove tumors of the tonsil and base of tongue. While large incisions and open approaches can be avoided, oropharyngeal defects following TORS are traditionally left as an open wound to heal by secondary intention, resulting in significant postoperative pain, and possibly dysphagia and dehydration.

While this has been highlighted as a key outcome measure, studies on acute pain following TORS have not had any standardization regarding the timing of pain measurement, and pain assessment. Only one study has assessed pain during 'movement-related pain', such as swallowing, which has been advocated as a key metric. Most studies used a visual analogue scale, however, majority failed to describe the timing of pain assessment relative to administration of analgesia, time of day, or diet. Overall, pain ratings and opioid utilization were highly variable between studies resulting in pain ratings ranging widely from 2.5-8 in the first few days postoperatively.

Based on the current evidence, multimodal analgesia resulted in the lowest pain ratings following TORS, with those that included gabapentin, a COX-2 inhibitor and acetaminophen having excellent pain control in the early postoperative period. Using these regimens, Castellanos et al. found that postoperative opioid consumption significantly decreased in the first three postoperative days. Clayburgh, et al. identified that addition of perioperative corticosteroids was safe and significantly improved diet consistency, and decreased length of hospital stay, though pain scores were minimally affected.

No study thus far has assessed the impact of surgical interventions on postoperative pain and swallowing. This single center, phase II, randomized control trial aims to evaluate the impact of the buccal fat rotational flap on the postoperative pain following TORS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tonsil Neoplasm Oropharynx Neoplasm Transoral Robotic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy alone

Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy without buccal fat reconstruction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No buccal fat reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect

Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy with buccal fat reconstruction

Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy with buccal fat reconstruction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Buccal fat reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ipsilateral buccal fat rotation flap for reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Buccal fat reconstruction

Ipsilateral buccal fat rotation flap for reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No buccal fat reconstruction

No reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18
2. Require a transoral robotic lateral oropharyngectomy as a result of the following conditions :

* Early - intermediate stage tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (T1-2N0-1 p16+/- SCC of the palatine tonsils)
* Early -intermediate stage salivary gland tumors of the palatine tonsils
* based on FNA, Core biopsy, Punch biopsy
3. Ability to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of prior head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or prior head and neck radiotherapy
2. Presence of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy
3. Presence of bilateral lymphadenopathy, or patients requiring bilateral neck dissections.
4. Patients with trismus at baseline
5. Patients with psychological risk factors for persistent opioid use or drug addiction
6. Need for open surgery (transcervical lateral oropharyngectomy), free tissue transfer, or alternative regional flap.
7. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christopher Yao

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christopher Yao, MD FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto

John R de Almeida, MD MSc FRCSC

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Health Network, Toronto

Michael Xie, MD FRCSC

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Health Network, Toronto

Rosemary Martino, Ma MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Health Network, Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christopher Yao, MD FRCSC

Role: CONTACT

(416) 340-3063

Michael Xie, MD FRCSC

Role: CONTACT

(416) 340-3063

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-5894

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intracapsular Tonsillectomy in Adults
NCT03654742 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Outpatient Management of Tonsillectomy in Adults
NCT05915559 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA