Buccal Fat for Transoral Robotic Lateral Oropharyngectomy Defects to and Postoperative Pain
NCT ID: NCT06965738
Last Updated: 2025-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-01
2027-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block in Pediatric Tonsillectomy
NCT07176533
Coblation Tonsillotomy Versus Radiofrequency and Cold Knife Dissection Tonsillectomy
NCT06937762
Randomized Controlled Study of Plasmaknife Tonsillectomy Versus Monopolar Tonsillectomy
NCT00466544
Tonsillectomy vs. Tonsillotomy in Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT06376383
The Effectiveness of Local Infiltration Technique in Adult Tonsillectomy
NCT03806335
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While this has been highlighted as a key outcome measure, studies on acute pain following TORS have not had any standardization regarding the timing of pain measurement, and pain assessment. Only one study has assessed pain during 'movement-related pain', such as swallowing, which has been advocated as a key metric. Most studies used a visual analogue scale, however, majority failed to describe the timing of pain assessment relative to administration of analgesia, time of day, or diet. Overall, pain ratings and opioid utilization were highly variable between studies resulting in pain ratings ranging widely from 2.5-8 in the first few days postoperatively.
Based on the current evidence, multimodal analgesia resulted in the lowest pain ratings following TORS, with those that included gabapentin, a COX-2 inhibitor and acetaminophen having excellent pain control in the early postoperative period. Using these regimens, Castellanos et al. found that postoperative opioid consumption significantly decreased in the first three postoperative days. Clayburgh, et al. identified that addition of perioperative corticosteroids was safe and significantly improved diet consistency, and decreased length of hospital stay, though pain scores were minimally affected.
No study thus far has assessed the impact of surgical interventions on postoperative pain and swallowing. This single center, phase II, randomized control trial aims to evaluate the impact of the buccal fat rotational flap on the postoperative pain following TORS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy alone
Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy without buccal fat reconstruction
No buccal fat reconstruction
No reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect
Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy with buccal fat reconstruction
Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy with buccal fat reconstruction
Buccal fat reconstruction
Ipsilateral buccal fat rotation flap for reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Buccal fat reconstruction
Ipsilateral buccal fat rotation flap for reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect
No buccal fat reconstruction
No reconstruction of lateral oropharyngectomy defect
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Require a transoral robotic lateral oropharyngectomy as a result of the following conditions :
* Early - intermediate stage tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (T1-2N0-1 p16+/- SCC of the palatine tonsils)
* Early -intermediate stage salivary gland tumors of the palatine tonsils
* based on FNA, Core biopsy, Punch biopsy
3. Ability to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy
3. Presence of bilateral lymphadenopathy, or patients requiring bilateral neck dissections.
4. Patients with trismus at baseline
5. Patients with psychological risk factors for persistent opioid use or drug addiction
6. Need for open surgery (transcervical lateral oropharyngectomy), free tissue transfer, or alternative regional flap.
7. Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christopher Yao
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher Yao, MD FRCSC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, Toronto
John R de Almeida, MD MSc FRCSC
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Health Network, Toronto
Michael Xie, MD FRCSC
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Health Network, Toronto
Rosemary Martino, Ma MSc PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Health Network, Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-5894
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.