NeVa Retrospective Comparative SR Study

NCT ID: NCT06964724

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-15

Study Completion Date

2026-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare safety and effectiveness of NeVa Stent Retriever (SR) to Control SR in the treatment of stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. The main questions it aims to answer are:

How do recanalization rates for NeVa SR compare with those of the Control SR? How does NeVa SR safety compare with Control SR safety?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

NITRO is a multicenter, retrospective, comparative, non-inferiority, cohort study designed to compare NeVa SR with Control SR for safety and effectiveness when removing thrombus in subjects presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). The objective of the NeVa International, Multi-center, Retrospective Comparative stent retriever (SR) study (NITRO) study is to compare safety and effectiveness of the NeVa SR to commonly used SR with CE-mark, and US FDA clearance, to restore blood flow in patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke due to large intracranial vessel occlusion. NITRO aims to collect data describing real-world clinical practices when using SRs according to their indicated use within the indicated population. As such, the eligibility criteria define patients who are diagnosed with AIS and are indicated for endovascular MT aligning to the target population for the proposed device. The present study will include data from subjects treated with either NeVa SR or one of the Control SR. Control SR will include any SR commonly used in thrombectomy trials as first-line strategies and which represent CE-mark, and US FDA cleared stent retrievers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion

According to Guidelines AIS patients due to LVO should receive mechanical thrombectomy (with a stent retriever) under certain conditions.

Mechanical thrombectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mechanical thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Treatment during the enrollment period
* Age ≥18
* Baseline modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≤ 1
* Pre-stroke modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0 or 1
* Internal Carotid Artery (ICA), Middle Cerebral Artery (first segment M1/ second segment M2), basilar artery or vertebral artery occlusion
* National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 and ≤ 25
* Thrombectomy procedure initiated within 8h of Time Last Known Well (TLKW)
* Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator (IV-tPA) failed, given within 3h of TLKW, or ineligibility for thrombolytic drug

Exclusion Criteria

* First line contact aspiration alone or non-study device as first-line device
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vesalio

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antoine Cuijpers, MSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Vesalio

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Espanol de Mendoza

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

CHU LIege

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

UK Munster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Republican Vilnius University Hospital

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

İstanbul Aydrn Üniversitesi

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Belgium Germany Lithuania Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VS-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kaneka Endovascular Embolization and Protection
NCT05563051 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA