External Validation of Ten Prediction Models for 30-day Mortality Following Hip Fracture
NCT ID: NCT06961253
Last Updated: 2025-11-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
3500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-01
2026-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Care Pathways for Benchmarking on Fragile Hip Fractures Rapid Recovery
NCT03941353
Hip Fracture in Individuals Under 60 Years of Age
NCT03848195
RCT: Added Value of Coordinator for the Management of Hip Fracture Patients
NCT01785381
Predictive Factors for Failure of Internal Fixations of Lower Limb Fractures
NCT03091114
Waiting Time to Operation for Hip-fracture Patients
NCT01488812
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of short-term mortality after hip fracture, but many have shown only moderate predictive performance or lacked clinical applicability. In 2024, a systematic review identified ten models with a low risk of bias, based on methodological criteria such as adequate sample size, proper handling of missing data, internal validation, and assessment of calibration.
This study aims to externally validate these ten prediction models using data from the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA) combined with additional structured and unstructured clinical information extracted through CTcue, a text-mining software tool. Approximately 35 variables, including key preoperative factors such as age, sex, ASA score, institutionalization, and metastatic cancer, will be analyzed. Missing data will be addressed through multiple imputation.
The primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality following a hip fracture. Validation of the models will involve evaluation of predictive performance through discrimination (area under the curve \[AUC\]), explained variance (R²), and calibration curves. The DeLong test will be used to statistically compare model AUCs. Clinical usefulness will be assessed by calculating Net Benefit and conducting Decision Curve Analysis.
By rigorously validating these models in a large, real-world cohort, the study aims to identify which models offer both strong predictive accuracy and practical feasibility for supporting shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who underwent surgery at OLVG between January 1, 2016, and March 1, 2024, with an indication of hip fracture; and.
* Availability of independent predictor variables for at least one of the selected prediction models in the medical record.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with periprosthetic fractures (fractures around an existing hip prosthesis) at the time of presentation.
* Patients aged under 18 years at the time of hip fracture.
* Patients who declined the use of their medical data for research purposes.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
JointResearch
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diederik H.R. Kempen, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
OLVG
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OLVG
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WO 24.013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.