Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of the Minimally Invasive Ennovate® Method for Pedicle Screw Placement
NCT ID: NCT06960018
Last Updated: 2025-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-20
2028-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Concurrent Treatment for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT03636009
Analysis of Sub Axial Cervical Pedicle Spine Based on CT
NCT06445348
In Vivo Quantification of Cervical Collar Efficacy
NCT05262140
Accuracy And Safety of Trans Pedicular Screw Fixation of The Sub-axial Cervical Spine Using A Triad- Dependent Technique
NCT05855642
Manual Therapy and Movement Control Exercises for Chronic Neck Pain. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06189612
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
In addition, stratification by clinical investigation sites is applied. Group 1: Patients treated with the Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique. Group 2: Patients treated with the Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique. Study is designed to provide a comparison of the both groups regarding the short-term pain outcome.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implantation Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique
Ennovate® Cervical, open surgical technique
Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of
* Fractures
* Degenerative instability
* Post-trauma instability
* Tumors
* Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique
Implantation Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique.
Ennovate® Cervical, minimal invasive surgical technique
Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of
* Fractures
* Degenerative instability
* Post-trauma instability
* Tumors
* Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ennovate® Cervical, open surgical technique
Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of
* Fractures
* Degenerative instability
* Post-trauma instability
* Tumors
* Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique
Ennovate® Cervical, minimal invasive surgical technique
Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of
* Fractures
* Degenerative instability
* Post-trauma instability
* Tumors
* Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Absolute contraindications according to the IFU:
* Severe damage to the bone structures of the spine that could prevent the stable implantation of the implant components; for example, osteopenia, severe osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone tumors etc.
* Metabolic or degenerative metabolic bone diseases that could compromise the stable anchoring of the implant system.
* Suspected allergy or sensitivity to the implant materials.
* Acute or chronic vertebral infections of a local or systemic nature.
* Poor patient compliance or limited ability to follow medical instructions, particularly in the postop phase, including with regard to the restrictions on range of movement in terms of physical exercise and occupational activity.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aesculap AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, , Germany
Charité Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Christian Blume, Dr.med.
Role: primary
Peter Vajkozcy, Prof.
Role: primary
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAG-O-H-23045
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.