Effect of Alcohol Sclerotherapy on Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life in Women With Ovarian Endometriosis
NCT ID: NCT06955221
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
288 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. \- Does sclerotherapy significantly reduce pelvic pain compared to expectant management?
2. \- Does sclerotherapy improve quality of life as measured by the EHP-5 score?
Researchers will compare the sclerotherapy group to the expectant management group to determine whether the intervention leads to greater improvement in pain and quality of life.
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) Sclerotherapy group: undergo ultrasound-guided puncture and alcohol sclerotherapy; (2) Control group: expectant management
* Complete quality of life and pain assessments at baseline and after 6 months
* Provide blood and urine samples for biomarker analysis (e.g., cortisol, IL-6, hsCRP, catecholamines)
* Undergo ovarian reserve assessments (AMH, antral follicle count)
* Be followed for adverse events, recurrence, fertility outcomes, and treatment-related costs
The study will follow an intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis approach.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Therapy of Endometrioma: Sclerotherapy vs Cystectomy in Patients With Unfinished Reproductive Plans
NCT05801523
Endometrioma Sclerotherapy and Ovarian Preservation
NCT06775769
Ovarian Endometrioma Ablation Using Plasma Energy Versus Cystectomy
NCT01596985
Antimullerian Hormone in Endometriomas
NCT02669628
Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH) After Treatment of Endometriomas With Alcohol Sclerotherapy Versus Surgery: Clinical Trial
NCT03571776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It affects 5-10% of women of reproductive age (Becker et al., 2022) and is associated with infertility in 40% of cases (Coccia et al., 2008). Among its clinical forms, ovarian endometrioma is the most frequent, appearing in 15-45% of patients with endometriosis (Cranney et al., 2017). In addition to its impact on fertility, the main clinical manifestation of endometriosis is pain. Chronic pelvic pain caused by endometriosis can be disabling and even lead to work absenteeism, with a significant impact on the quality of life of affected patients, who often experience delayed diagnosis, making its management even more difficult and requiring a multidisciplinary approach (Horne \& Missmer, 2022).
Currently, there is still no consensus on what should be the first-line treatment for ovarian endometrioma (Gordts \& Campo, 2019). However, cystectomy reduces ovarian reserve due to the removal of healthy ovarian tissue adjacent to the cyst wall-something that further worsens the reproductive prognosis in patients whose fertility is already diminished due to endometriosis per se (Alborzi et al., 2021; Martinez-Garcia et al., 2021). Moreover, despite surgical removal of the endometrioma, the recurrence rate is high, ranging from 15-30% (Jee, 2022).
In recent years, there has been a shift toward more conservative treatments for the management of endometrioma, such as expectant management or aspiration and sclerosis (Garcia-Tejedor et al., 2020). Various authors have shown that ultrasound-guided aspiration and alcohol sclerosis may be a promising option, as concluded in the meta-analysis by Cohen et al., which found that recurrence rates were similar to those of laparoscopic management of ovarian endometrioma, but with fewer complications. Results in assisted reproductive technology are also better compared to surgical treatment in symptomatic women, particularly in those with low ovarian reserve (Zhang et al., 2022). Furthermore, other comparative studies between surgery and aspiration-sclerosis have shown that, although recurrence rates are similar, pregnancy rates are higher in patients treated with sclerosis, with the same complication rate and significantly lower costs (Garcia-Tejedor et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022).
Currently, the first-line treatment in patients diagnosed with endometriosis is hormonal therapy through the use of hormonal contraceptives. However, its efficacy in managing endometrioma is lower, and therefore, there is no consensus on its indication for this specific form of endometriosis (Cranney et al., 2017). In patients with a desire for pregnancy, alternative approaches are sought that do not interfere with fertility. At present, this often involves proceeding with in vitro fertilization without treating the endometrioma first, followed by surgery if needed (Miquel et al., 2020).
In addition to reproductive outcomes in patients affected by endometriosis, symptomatology and its consequent impact on quality of life have become highly relevant factors in treatment selection. Accordingly, specific pain scales and quality-of-life questionnaires have been developed to assess the impact on women affected by this condition. One such tool is the Endometriosis Health Profile scale, available in two versions (EHP-30 and EHP-5), designed by Dr. Stephen Kennedy and his team at the University of Oxford. It is a validated scale for assessing quality of life in patients with endometriosis and has been translated into nearly all languages (Jones et al., 2023; Bourdel et al., 2019).
The main objective of this project is to conduct a comparative analysis of patients diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma who undergo alcohol aspiration and sclerosis versus patients managed expectantly.
The outcomes to be evaluated include impact on quality of life, clinical improvement, pregnancy rate, and the need for subsequent surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound-guided aspiration and alcohol sclerotherapy
US-guided alcohol sclerotherapy of endometriomas with absolute etanol during 15 minutes, followed by a posterior wash.
Ultrasound-guided aspiration and alcohol sclerotherapy
Ultrasound-guided puncture and alcohol sclerotherapy
Control group
Expectant management with standard pain management if required
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided aspiration and alcohol sclerotherapy
Ultrasound-guided puncture and alcohol sclerotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 and ≤45 years
* Ultrasound suspicion of unilocular endometrioma or with a thin septum less than 3 mm
* Size between 30-100 mm, persistent for at least 3-6 months since diagnosis
* Ca125 marker \<300 UI/mL and HE4 \< 70 pM
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* History of ovarian or uterine cancer
* Endometrioma size \<30 mm or \>100 mm
* Indication for surgical treatment of the endometrioma due to suspected severe extra-ovarian endometriosis or any other cause
* Ultrasound suspicion of dermoid cysts, anechoic cysts, or cysts with high risk of malignancy
* Ca125 \>300 UI/mL
* HE4 \>70 pM
* Pregnant women
* Patients who do not wish to participate in the study or who are mentally incapacitated
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Carlos III Health Institute
OTHER_GOV
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amparo Garcia-Tejedor
Clinical Professor, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amparo Garcia-Tejedor, MDPhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Rodrigo Javier Guevara-Peralta
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital General de Granollers
Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia
Igualada, Barcelona, Spain
Consorci Sanitari Integral
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu
Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de Viladecans
Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario Doctor José Molina Orosa
Arrecife, Canary Islands, Spain
Hospital Universitario San Pedro
Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
Hospital General Universitario Los Arcos del Mar Menor
San Javier, Murcia, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes
Gijón, Principality of Asturias, Spain
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Jaén
Jaén, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII
Tarragona, , Spain
Hospital Recoletas Salud Campo Grande
Valladolid, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Álava - Txagorritxu
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Álava, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR 070/25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.