A Multimedia Presentation to Augment the Informed Consent Process for Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Scheduled Caesarian Delivery

NCT ID: NCT06945250

Last Updated: 2025-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-06

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The informed consent process is an important part of any surgical and anesthetic intervention. It is also perhaps the most intellectually demanding portion of interacting with the healthcare system for patients. Competent patients have full autonomy over which treatments they receive, and making an informed choice about the decision to undergo a treatment requires at minimum a discussion of the proposed intervention, its risks and benefits, and alternatives to the proposed intervention.

The objective is to improve the anesthesia informed consent process for patients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery through the use of a pre-recorded audiovisual presentation that discusses the logistical aspects of perioperative care and the risks and benefits of anesthesia which is provided to patients prior to meeting their anesthesiologist.

The hypothesis is that the use of an audiovisual presentation which explains the purpose and nature of anesthesia for Caesarean delivery provided to the patient at least 24 hours prior to their procedure will result in a 10% increase in the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making as measured by the Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication and Treatment Decision Making Effectiveness (COMRADE) tool.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Caesarean Section

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

Intervention Group: Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a link to the audiovisual presentation via e-mail to review prior to coming into the hospital for caesarean section.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental Audio Visual

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants in this group will receive the audiovisual presentation

Control Group

Control Group: Participants randomized to the control group will not receive the link to the audiovisual presentation

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental Audio Visual

Participants in this group will receive the audiovisual presentation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 or over on the day of the procedure
2. Able to provide verbal and written informed consent for participation in the study
3. Primarily English-speaking patients (the audiovisual presentation will be available only in English

Exclusion Criteria

1. Refusal or inability to participate or provide informed consent
2. Primarily non-English speaking patients
3. At the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist of record due to medical complexity
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eleanor Kenny

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eleanor Kenny, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern Univesity

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Paul C Fitzgerald, RN,BSN,MS

Role: CONTACT

3126951064

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Paul C Fitzgerald, RN,BSN,MS

Role: primary

312-695-1064

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Holmes-Rovner M, Kinnersley P, Houston H, Russell I. The development of COMRADE--a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):311-22. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00055-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12900105 (View on PubMed)

Cassady JF Jr, Wysocki TT, Miller KM, Cancel DD, Izenberg N. Use of a preanesthetic video for facilitation of parental education and anxiolysis before pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999 Feb;88(2):246-50. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199902000-00004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9972735 (View on PubMed)

Wisselo TL, Stuart C, Muris P. Providing parents with information before anaesthesia: what do they really want to know? Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Apr;14(4):299-307. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01222.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15078374 (View on PubMed)

Atsaidis Z, Antel R, Guadagno E, Wiseman J, Poenaru D. Understanding the effectiveness of consent processes and conversations in pediatric surgery: A systematic-scoping review. J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Dec;57(12):834-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36031429 (View on PubMed)

Garden AL, Merry AF, Holland RL, Petrie KJ. Anaesthesia information--what patients want to know. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Oct;24(5):594-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400516.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8909673 (View on PubMed)

Jawaid M, Farhan M, Masood Z, Husnain S. Preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed? Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(9):25-30. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23193502 (View on PubMed)

Tait AR, Teig MK, Voepel-Lewis T. Informed consent for anesthesia: a review of practice and strategies for optimizing the consent process. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):832-42. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0188-8. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24898765 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00222960

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Invia Motion at Cesarean Study
NCT04365452 COMPLETED PHASE4
Caesarean and Corticotherapy
NCT00446953 COMPLETED PHASE4