Single vs. Dual Implant Fixation for Distal Femur Fractures in Older or Compromised Adults
NCT ID: NCT06944964
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-01
2030-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Can DIF improve patient outcomes compared to SIF in older or compromised adults?
* How feasible is it to recruit and retain participants for this trial?
Participants will:
1. Be randomly assigned to receive either SIF or DIF for their DFF treatment
2. Visit the clinic for follow-ups and assessments of their recovery and bone healing, including potential ultrasound imaging for detecting complications like non-union.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DIFFIR - Geriatric Distal Femur Fixation Versus Replacement
NCT04076735
Far Cortical Locking Versus Standard Constructs for Distal Femur Fractures
NCT01766648
Single Versus Dual Implant Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures
NCT06286670
Dual Implant Versus Single Implant Distal End of Femur
NCT05292313
Evaluation of the Effects of Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Plating Techniques in Distal Femoral Fractures
NCT00552331
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Aim: Evaluate the feasibility of conducting a larger, definitive trial examining outcomes following SIF vs. DIF for DFFs in older or compromised adults. Our primary outcomes for this objective will be 1) recruitment and retention at the participating sites; and 2) site investigator feedback regarding barriers to protocol adherence.
Secondary Aims: Pilot the collection of candidate outcome measures to determine the optimal primary end point and sample size for a definitive trial. Our primary outcome for this objective will be the Oxford Knee Score, and secondary outcomes will include a range of patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measures, and objective clinical measures.
In addition, the study includes an ultrasound sub-study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of using ultrasound imaging to monitor bone healing and detect complications like non-union in patients with DFF.
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either SIF or DIF, with SIF generally involving a single implant (such as a lateral locked plate or retrograde intramedullary nail) and DIF using a combination of implants (e.g., dual plates or a nail and plate). This randomized design will enable us to assess whether dual implant fixation offers improved clinical outcomes, such as reduced morbidity and faster weight-bearing recovery, compared to the more traditional single implant fixation.
Non-Randomized Participation: The investigators will collect data surrounding the number of eligible patients approached for consent, eligible patients not approached for consent and reason why, along with the proportion of patients who do not consent and reasons why to refine our strategy for the definitive trial. For patients who are excluded due to a lack of clinical equipoise, the investigators will provide the option of participating in a concurrent cohort study.This study will record the same variables as the RCT.
The trial will take place at four major trauma centers across Canada: London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital, St. Michael's Hospital, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and Alberta Health Services Centre. Participants will receive follow-up visits at these centers, which will include clinical check-ups, rehabilitation sessions, and imaging assessments to track their recovery progress.
The data gathered from this feasibility study will provide critical insights into the practicality of a larger-scale trial and will help inform future treatment strategies for distal femur fractures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (Control): Single Implant Fixation (SIF)
Patients in this arm will undergo fixation of distal femur fractures using a single implant, which could be a lateral locked plate or a retrograde intramedullary nail.
Single Implant Fixation (SIF)
This intervention involves using one implant for fracture fixation. The implant can be either a lateral locked plate or a retrograde intramedullary nail, based on the surgeon's preference.
Group B (Experimental): Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)
Patients in this arm will undergo fixation using dual implants, either dual plate fixation or a combination of nail and plate fixation.
Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)
This intervention involves using two implants for fracture fixation. The combination can be either dual plate fixation (DPF) or combination nail plate fixation (NPF) .
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single Implant Fixation (SIF)
This intervention involves using one implant for fracture fixation. The implant can be either a lateral locked plate or a retrograde intramedullary nail, based on the surgeon's preference.
Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)
This intervention involves using two implants for fracture fixation. The combination can be either dual plate fixation (DPF) or combination nail plate fixation (NPF) .
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Rorabeck type 1, 2) and either:
1. Age ≥ 60 years or;
2. Age 18-60 years with one or more of:
i. Osteoporosis ii. Obesity (Body Mass Index \>30) iii. Metaphyseal comminution iv. Diabetes
2. Fracture amenable to plating and nailing
3. Ability to read and speak English or availability of a translator
4. Acute fractures (within 14-days of injury)
5. No surgeon preference regarding SIF vs. DIF
6. Provision of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Periprosthetic fracture with loose implant
3. Gustillo grade III open fractures
4. Ipsilateral hip implant
5. Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e., no fixed address, mentally competent to give consent, etc.)
6. Non-ambulatory patients
7. Multi-trauma patient (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16)
8. Lack of bone substance or poor bone-quality which, in the surgeon's judgment, makes fixation impossible
9. Any concomitant lower-extremity injury
10. Inability to obtain informed consent due to language barrier
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Orthopaedic Trauma Association
OTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fraser Orthopaedic Institute
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
David Cinats, MD, FRCS(C)
Role: primary
Lawson Health Research Institute
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DFF Feasibility Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.