Delivery and Implementation of a Randomised Crossover Trial on Thrombosis

NCT ID: NCT06937372

Last Updated: 2026-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21194 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-08-01

Study Completion Date

2028-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

What is the Study About? The DIRECT study (Delivery and Implementation of a Randomised Crossover Trial on Thrombosis) is a large research project investigating the best way to prevent blood clots (thrombosis) in people who break their hip. The study will compare two common treatments: aspirin (a tablet) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, an injection).

Every year, thousands of people in the UK suffer a hip fracture, which often requires surgery and hospital care. After a hip fracture, patients are at risk of developing serious blood clots in their legs (deep vein thrombosis, DVT) or lungs (pulmonary embolism, PE), which can be life-threatening. Currently, doctors prescribe different medications to prevent these clots, but there is uncertainty about which treatment is best for people with hip fractures.

Why is This Study Needed? Blood clot prevention is vital for hip fracture patients, but the current recommended treatment (LMWH) involves daily injections for 28 days, which some patients find uncomfortable and difficult to manage at home. Aspirin, a tablet taken by mouth, is a much simpler alternative, but there is not enough evidence to confirm whether it is as effective and safe as LMWH in this group of patients.

The DIRECT study will help doctors and the NHS understand whether aspirin could be a safe and cost-effective alternative to LMWH. If aspirin is found to be just as effective, it could make treatment easier for patients and save millions of pounds for the NHS.

How Will the Study Work? The study will involve 96 hospitals across the UK and will include over 21,000 patients aged 60 and older who have broken their hip. Hospitals will be randomly assigned to use either aspirin or LMWH as their standard treatment for a set period. After this, they will switch to the other treatment. This approach allows researchers to compare the two treatments fairly.

All data will be collected from national NHS databases, which routinely record patient care and outcomes. This means patients will not need to do anything extra or attend additional follow-ups.

What Are the Expected Benefits?

This study will provide clear evidence on which treatment is better for preventing blood clots while minimising risks like bleeding. If aspirin is shown to be as effective as LMWH, it could:

* Reduce the need for daily injections, making treatment more comfortable for patients.
* Lower NHS costs, as aspirin is much cheaper than LMWH.
* Provide a simple, widely available treatment option for older adults with hip fractures.

How Will Patient Data Be Protected? The study will use anonymised patient data from NHS records. This means that all personal details will be kept confidential and protected according to strict NHS and research regulations. Patients who do not want their data to be used can opt out via NHS data-sharing policies.

Summary The DIRECT study is an important project that will help improve care for hip fracture patients by determining whether aspirin can be a safe and effective alternative to injections for preventing blood clots. The results will help shape future NHS guidelines, ensuring patients receive the best possible treatment while reducing unnecessary costs and discomfort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A multicentre, pragmatic, standard-of-care controlled, cluster (hospital) randomised, single crossover, registry-enabled trial reporting a single-sided comparison for non-inferiority of a first-line thromboprophylaxis strategy including aspirin compared with LMWH.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aspirin Arm

Patients in hospitals allocated to this arm will receive aspirin as their routine thromboprophylaxis after surgery. Aspirin is a widely available, low-cost medication that may reduce the risk of blood clots with fewer side effects such as bleeding.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in hospitals allocated to this arm will receive aspirin as their routine thromboprophylaxis after surgery.

Intervention Type DRUG

Unlike low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which requires daily subcutaneous injections, aspirin is taken orally, making it more comfortable and acceptable for patients, particularly the elderly or those with mobility issues. Aspirin is significantly less expensive than injectable anticoagulants like LMWH or newer oral anticoagulants, making it a potentially cost-effective alternative for thromboprophylaxis.

Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) Arm

Patients in hospitals allocated to this arm will receive LMWH, which is the current standard treatment in many hospitals for preventing blood clots after hip surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)

Intervention Type DRUG

LMWH is administered via daily subcutaneous injection, typically starting shortly after surgery and continued for a defined period as per each hospital's local policy, often 14 to 28 days. LMWH has a proven track record of reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after surgery.

However, it carries a risk of bleeding and may be challenging for some frail or elderly patients to tolerate, especially if self-injection is required post-discharge.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patients in hospitals allocated to this arm will receive aspirin as their routine thromboprophylaxis after surgery.

Unlike low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which requires daily subcutaneous injections, aspirin is taken orally, making it more comfortable and acceptable for patients, particularly the elderly or those with mobility issues. Aspirin is significantly less expensive than injectable anticoagulants like LMWH or newer oral anticoagulants, making it a potentially cost-effective alternative for thromboprophylaxis.

Intervention Type DRUG

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)

LMWH is administered via daily subcutaneous injection, typically starting shortly after surgery and continued for a defined period as per each hospital's local policy, often 14 to 28 days. LMWH has a proven track record of reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after surgery.

However, it carries a risk of bleeding and may be challenging for some frail or elderly patients to tolerate, especially if self-injection is required post-discharge.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults from 60 to 150 years sustaining fragility hip fracture identified by their entry into UK hip registries.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who do not meet the eligibility criteria to be enrolled in the NHFD and SHFA registries Hip fracture individuals above 150 years of age.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Mary University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nkemjika S Abiakam, BSc, MRes, MSc, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Jamila Kassam, BSc (Hons), MRes MCSP

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIHR159321

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Edge Number: 177790

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PREVENTion of Clot in Orthopaedic Trauma
NCT02984384 COMPLETED PHASE3
Cancer Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
NCT02073682 COMPLETED PHASE3
Statin in Hip Fracture
NCT01494090 TERMINATED PHASE3
Aspirin and Enoxaparin for VTE in Trauma
NCT02396732 TERMINATED PHASE4